Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:23 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:07 pm
Posts: 1149
Fearless Frog wrote:
Sorry but Wilson does not have the luxury of playing like a rookie when there is a perfectly good veteran option on the bench (who I'm betting money on will still be a far better pro than Wilson). And Wilson is in a FAR better situation than the other rookie QBs being compared. Realistically, this may be the best team Wilson will ever be a part of. This is the best defense in franchise history and a rushing game that compares favorably with 2005's.


Less starting experience than Wilson does not make him a veteran. Sitting on the bench for all but one season of your eight year college and professional career does not make you a veteran. Wilson had more starts in college and has more starts in the pro's. Game experience is far more valuable than sitting for years.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:09 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 6156
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
Fearless Frog wrote:

Sorry but Wilson does not have the luxury of playing like a rookie when there is a perfectly good veteran option on the bench (who I'm betting money on will still be a far better pro than Wilson).


Dude should have beat out the rookie, then.

_________________
Image

Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:32 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:30 pm
Posts: 316
Zebulon Dak wrote:
Fearless Frog wrote:
Zebulon Dak wrote:

Ah, I see. So if we lose it's his fault but if we win it's none of his doing. Got it. Good talk.


Wins are not a QB stat. This is not an opinion. Teams win games. A QB can throw 3 pick-sixes and his team can still win, do you credit that as a "QB win" and "he played well enough for the team to win"?


It depends on what he did with the rest of his snaps. No 1, 2 or even 3 plays win or lose a game on their own.

You're only as strong as your weakest link, right? Right now the Seahwks are 3-2. Russell Wilson is 3-2 as a starting QB. Take your bullshit somewhere else.

Wow, just wow. Do you have some man crush on Wilson? No logic to this argument and you use profanity. Classy!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:35 pm 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 9972
Location: King In The North
edogg23 wrote:
Wow, just wow. Do you have some man crush on Wilson? No logic to this argument and you use profanity. Classy!


GFY.

Well, at least now we know who's alias Fearless Frog is.

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹²


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:39 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:30 pm
Posts: 316
Cool 2 posts in a row that make no sense...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:40 pm 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 9972
Location: King In The North
edogg23 wrote:
Cool 2 posts in a row that make no sense...


wtf is your problem?

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹²


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:43 pm 
NET Starter
Offline

Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 8:30 pm
Posts: 316
You are cursing at people who have a valid point and then accusing me of using different usernames. That's my problem. I've been trying to stay out of these arguments lately but this is ridiculous.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 8:47 pm 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 9972
Location: King In The North
edogg23 wrote:
You are cursing at people who have a valid point and then accusing me of using different usernames. That's my problem. I've been trying to stay out of these arguments lately but this is ridiculous.


You don't like it? Take it to the Shack then buddy. There's no personal attacks in the main forum.

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹²


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:04 pm 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7225
Zebulon Dak wrote:
Well, at least now we know who's alias Fearless Frog is.


Fearless Frog isn't anybody's alias. He's QUITE notorious over at Fieldgulls, where he's long since been banned. I always liked his contributions though, personally.

_________________
Image
"I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman
"If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:14 am 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 9972
Location: King In The North
kearly wrote:
Zebulon Dak wrote:
Well, at least now we know who's alias Fearless Frog is.


Fearless Frog isn't anybody's alias. He's QUITE notorious over at Fieldgulls, where he's long since been banned. I always liked his contributions though, personally.


Seems like a real class act.

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹²


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:23 am 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2012 2:43 pm
Posts: 184
this argument sounds exactly like every argument i ever heard from a senior in highschool who lost his job to some "frosh who didn't deserve to be there" and how the team would be doing so much better if they were in there........


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:20 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 6316
Location: Vancouver, WA
LymonHawk wrote:
Hmmm....where have I seen this thread before?

Preach it brother.
Here's something else O'Neil said regarding the QB situation. It pretty much sums up these boards the last several weeks:


They signed Flynn in free agency, and could have gone with him, and when Carroll still opted for the rookie it meant that Wilson wasn't going to be measured against other rookies, he was going to be compared to what everyone imagined Flynn might be doing with this same opportunity.

The result is an argument that is endlessly circular and not all that informative about how Wilson is either performing or progressing.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:32 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7318
Fearless Frog. Nice to see you make your way over from every opponents board over at SBN to ours. I agree, wins are not a QB stat that can be equally applied.

But what about comeback wins in the 4th quarter? while still a vague way to measure, that is a stat I have always looked at because of it's clutch indicator and it's correlation to a quarterback getting a grasp of the defense he is facing.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:05 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 1:31 am
Posts: 1367
BASF wrote:
Fearless Frog wrote:
Sorry but Wilson does not have the luxury of playing like a rookie when there is a perfectly good veteran option on the bench (who I'm betting money on will still be a far better pro than Wilson). And Wilson is in a FAR better situation than the other rookie QBs being compared. Realistically, this may be the best team Wilson will ever be a part of. This is the best defense in franchise history and a rushing game that compares favorably with 2005's.


Less starting experience than Wilson does not make him a veteran. Sitting on the bench for all but one season of your eight year college and professional career does not make you a veteran. Wilson had more starts in college and has more starts in the pro's. Game experience is far more valuable than sitting for years.

Wilson does indeed have more playing experience in the NFL, but Flynn is undoubtedly better at the mechanics of the game, Carroll mentioned as much. Those years in the NFL actually help Flynn in that regard. Wilson is seeing coverages, and certain pressure packages that he has never seen when he played in the NCAA. Flynn has had 4 years to study the pro game, and as I said Carroll eluded to Flynn being more adept at pre-snap reads, and audibles. I have no doubt that Flynn is the better player right now, but there are some reasons why Carroll went with Wilson.

The first of which is potential, and schematic fit. Carroll wants a very specific type of player and Russell Wilson fits his description of what he calls the "point guard" QB, Flynn does not. Secondly Wilson is more athletic and has the bigger arm than Flynn, and he has intangibles off of the chart. Carroll simply decided to go with potential rather than a player that may be better now.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 7:08 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am
Posts: 1841
I really hope that Wilson doesn't have more experience because that is what is holding him back and if he has more experience then either we are seeing his ceiling or Flynn's floor is already higher.

Make up your mind. Either Wilson needs to gain experience over Flynn or Flynn has the higher ceiling. It doesn't add up.

Pretty obvious to most, Flynn has improved each year and we should expect the same from Wilson. Trying to compare college starts and 5 rookie games to Flynn's time in the league is ridiculous. If it were not then it would be fair to say Flynn still has better numbers in two games than Wilson has in five. Just not as many picks.

_________________
"cheating", Eddie D. pled to a FELONY to avoid prison and paid players under the table. Brent Jones was paid 500k the year after he stopped playing for "services" in the 90's.. Of course, there is Carmen Policy also


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:20 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
Posts: 1336
Location: Marysville, WA
RichNhansom wrote:
I really hope that Wilson doesn't have more experience because that is what is holding him back and if he has more experience then either we are seeing his ceiling or Flynn's floor is already higher.

Make up your mind. Either Wilson needs to gain experience over Flynn or Flynn has the higher ceiling. It doesn't add up.

Pretty obvious to most, Flynn has improved each year and we should expect the same from Wilson. Trying to compare college starts and 5 rookie games to Flynn's time in the league is ridiculous. If it were not then it would be fair to say Flynn still has better numbers in two games than Wilson has in five. Just not as many picks.


Look what Flynn had in GB and compare that to what Wilson has in Seattle. The only thing going for Wilson is a great running game. GB is built around a passing attack that passes 60%+ times a game. Seattle under Carroll has been pretty 50/50 in terms of pass/run. I would think it would be much harder to get into a passing rhythm with your receivers when you are dedicated to establishing a run game as well.

_________________
Image Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:55 am 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:07 am
Posts: 246
I think a better way to compare Wilson is with his PEERS starting this year in the NFL: 92 yrs or less:

Luck -- Playing very well looks be the SUPERSTAR everyone expected him to be.

Tannahill --- Playing Amazingly well and keeping his team in the game (They are 2 OT away from being 4-1 thats amazing! and he threw for over 400 yards against AZ? I think.)

Wilson -- Smart QB, who reminds me personally a lot of Tom Brady in 2001. He is doing enough to win but not making the big mistake (usually) to cost the team the game.

Cleveland QB (I forgot hi name) -- got feel sorry for him no one to throw to and the line is gawd awful.. I say INC since he has no chance.


Locker -- very slow delivery and can be easily fooled by D right now, has a lot of growing to do still.

RG3 --- Is a good QB, but I see a short life span with his scrambling causing him injuries and can he fall into the NEWTON TRAP?


Cam Newton -- Over rated and pouting big time. He is nothing more than a glorified Young, a below average QB wit running ability


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:25 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Wed May 25, 2011 7:26 am
Posts: 1841
AF the Pack are 2-3 right now with that vaunted offense and who many believe to be the best QB in football and he has, Jennings and Starks and a much better D then Flynn had so your argument is kind of mute right now

Here he would have an even better D and way better running game to take pressure off. Being able to read defenses, utilize a three step drop and the middle of the field along with throwing receivers open should help instead of hurt his chances.

_________________
"cheating", Eddie D. pled to a FELONY to avoid prison and paid players under the table. Brent Jones was paid 500k the year after he stopped playing for "services" in the 90's.. Of course, there is Carmen Policy also


Last edited by RichNhansom on Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:29 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 876
Wait, so O'Neil's point is that out of all the rookie QB's, Wilson has sucked the least?

This is the NFL, nobody cares if your QB is a rookie, he's held up to EVERY QB in the league, not just the rookies. Fair or not, this is about performing........and so far Wilson's at the bottom of just about every statistical QB category.

_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rookie QB comparison from O'Neil
 Post Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:47 am 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 6:18 pm
Posts: 1336
Location: Marysville, WA
RichNhansom wrote:
AF the Pack are 2-3 right now with that vaunted offense and who many believe to be the best QB in football and he has, Jennings and Starks and a much better D then Flynn had so your argument is kind of mute right now

Here he would have an even better D and way better running game to take pressure off. Being able to read defenses, utilize a three step drop and the middle of the field along with throwing receivers open should help instead of hurt his chances.


I'm talking about when Flynn played for GB, not the current GB Packers.

_________________
Image Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: arghawkfan, Big D, Cirmman, Geordie Hawk, godzillarad, Google [Bot], Hawker, Jase, kigenzun, Lawke, MSN [Bot], talic7 and 68 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.