 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: ESPN's new QBR tells it how it is with Wilson  Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:34 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
Wilson: 51.7 Newton: 15.1 http://scores.espn.go.com/nfl/boxscore?gameId=321007029Remember, this is not the normal, outdated QB rating. This is not just a plug it into a formula QB rating, it's a watch the film and grade plays QB rating. Worst a QB can perform is 0. Best a QB can perform is 100. (no QB has achieved a 0 or 100, but has gotten close) Average is 50. 65 is pro bowler. Like 75 or something is all-pro. So Wilson played slightly above average today. But guys, just think of how it would have been if Wilson didn't attempt that ugly pick 6, I'll bet his rating would be in the 60's.
|
|
  |
|
|
|
rideaducati
|
Post subject: Re: ESPN's new QBR tells it how it is with Wilson Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:41 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 556
|
|
QBR is subjective. What some guy "thinks" about the QB plays into the QBR. If you were to take the exact same stats for Wilson today and just change his name to Tom Brady, his QBR would be higher.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Re: ESPN's new QBR tells it how it is with Wilson Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:48 pm |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm
Posts: 4908
|
rideaducati wrote: QBR is subjective. What some guy "thinks" about the QB plays into the QBR. If you were to take the exact same stats for Wilson today and just change his name to Tom Brady, his QBR would be higher. You are way off on this one bud. QBR is legit. It does things like not counting the Lynch "fumble-ception" as Kearly calls it. They're having some trouble getting it accepted universally so I don't think they would dare allow any sembelance of unfairness. Personally, I like the QBR but they both have their place in football. _________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: ESPN's new QBR tells it how it is with Wilson Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
rideaducati wrote: QBR is subjective. What some guy "thinks" about the QB plays into the QBR. If you were to take the exact same stats for Wilson today and just change his name to Tom Brady, his QBR would be higher. Come up with some actual evidence and I may believe you.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ClumsyLurk
|
Post subject: Re: ESPN's new QBR tells it how it is with Wilson Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:52 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 373
|
|
Thank god RW3 didn't have to play against his own defense.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Shadowhawk
|
Post subject: Re: ESPN's new QBR tells it how it is with Wilson Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:53 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 626
|
hawksfan515 wrote: So Wilson played slightly above average today. But guys, just think of how it would have been if Wilson didn't attempt that ugly pick 6, I'll bet his rating would be in the 60's. It'd also be higher if Giacomini's holding penalty hadn't wiped out that 56-yard pass in the first quarter.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: ESPN's new QBR tells it how it is with Wilson Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:55 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15597
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
I couldnt care less about QB ratings. If we won i wouldnt care if he had a 10 or a 90. I dont need some formula to tell me when a QB is playing well or not, and Wilson played a pretty good game today and Newton played like poo. That was obvious just from watching the game, not from plugging numbers into an equation.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: ESPN's new QBR tells it how it is with Wilson Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:00 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 16616
Location: SoCal
|
Shadowhawk wrote: hawksfan515 wrote: So Wilson played slightly above average today. But guys, just think of how it would have been if Wilson didn't attempt that ugly pick 6, I'll bet his rating would be in the 60's. It'd also be higher if Giacomini's holding penalty hadn't wiped out that 56-yard pass in the first quarter. DING DING DING....We HAVE a Winner.......
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Navyhawkfan187
|
Post subject: Re: ESPN's new QBR tells it how it is with Wilson Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:01 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 12:48 am
Posts: 509
|
|
QBR is based off of Football Outsider's DVOA for QB's. Its still not perfect, it doesn't take quite as many things into account as DVOA does and its not weighted quite the same but its not bad. ESPN worked with the FO guys to develop it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: ESPN's new QBR tells it how it is with Wilson Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
JSeahawks wrote: I couldnt care less about QB ratings. If we won i wouldnt care if he had a 10 or a 90. I dont need some formula to tell me when a QB is playing well or not, and Wilson played a pretty good game today and Newton played like poo. That was obvious just from watching the game, not from plugging numbers into an equation. 1, they watch the game with this rating, not plugging numbers into an equation. Guess I didn't make that clear enough. And at ShadowHawk, I think they might have counted that. Not sure though.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: Apeman00, AVL, bloodkingg, bryantology79, Cartire, Chapow, coorslighthawk, CornerHawk, dbmack, drdiags, ensett, fenderbender123, GhostHawk, Google [Bot], grizbob, HawkDfence, Hawkfish, Hawknballs, Hendo66, jdblack, jlwaters1, Kixkahn, KK84, Largent80, LargentFan, MaverickHawk, McGruff, Missing_Clink, MSN [Bot], OkieHawk, otter, SeaChase, seahawks-in-qc, Speakinhawk68, tacomahawk, TCS, Terpdragon, tooshort, TriCHawk, Uffda, Veilside, WillySchu and 159 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
