General Manager wrote:
rlkats wrote:Not even close. Um ok, anything you say General. The Niners stables of RB are not as bad as you are hinting. are they the best? No. but they put 100% into their game and its pretty damn good. Really did not expect you to say the hawks RB are worse than the Niners RB but man give a little credit where its due. They are very solid and give many many teams fits. Marshawn is a beast of course, but if he was not there where would the other backs be? he beats the hell out of the D line and exhausts them for the other ones to come in. its called balance and different attack angles.
I don't think there bad at all just wouldn't trade them for ours.
I think the two RB corps are pretty similar, but the edge goes to the Seahawks until Lynch starts to degrade.
Lynch > Gore (but both are top 100 players)
Turbin < Hunter (Turbin may have a higher ceiling, but Hunter is proven)
Now, James is a 'swing-back, scat-back'. I don't know of a Seattle equivalent. Christine Michael could be very good, as could Lattimore.