FreshlySnipes
New member
It would be so dope to have sherm and Revis. I think it would play well also because they would consistently be trying to out perform each other and feed off that.
pinksheets":37e8vbgs said:At what point is there a level of diminishing returns, though?
I just don't see too many instances where making sure you've got an elite shutdown corner to cover a team's #2 is the best use of our resources.
Lady Talon":37e8vbgs said:No secondary can succeed in this league without a pass rush, mediocre QBs can pick good secondaries apart if they have all day to throw. All Revis would be is a expensive distraction that ensures we can't upgrade the pass rush and improve as a defense.
That's just not true.Lady Talon":3878dro9 said:No secondary can succeed in this league without a pass rush, mediocre QBs can pick good secondaries apart if they have all day to throw. All Revis would be is a expensive distraction that ensures we can't upgrade the pass rush and improve as a defense.
How?chris98251":cf8jo6xp said:Trading for Revis is like trying to trade for Aaron Rodgers in my opinion. How many would do that?
Hawkfan77":3g1n3z9l said:How?chris98251":3g1n3z9l said:Trading for Revis is like trying to trade for Aaron Rodgers in my opinion. How many would do that?
But we play more than 2 CBs on the field quite a bit and yet we only play 1 QB at any time.chris98251":1z8m16dj said:Hawkfan77":1z8m16dj said:How?chris98251":1z8m16dj said:Trading for Revis is like trying to trade for Aaron Rodgers in my opinion. How many would do that?
You already have a elite group of DB's and Browner does the physical dirtywork for that group at a lower cost. Swapping a cover guy for a physical guy when you have your cover guy in Sherman on the other side already isn't adding a lot except cost. With Wilson here already and growing and being more Mobile would we gain anything by bringing in Rodgers except some experience and higher cost is what I was referring to.
The money if spent would be much better applied to a pass ruhs which would help all 4 of our secondary guys versus trying to swap one guy out that doesn't bring any more of an advantage then we already have. Don't discount the physical presence of Browner and how he takes away one guy by just locking him up most plays.