Carmon1274
New member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 499
- Reaction score
- 0
Should there be instant replay on big hits?
Like how basketball with Flagrant foul?
Like how basketball with Flagrant foul?
JSeahawks":30xkeoby said:No. There's enough breaks in the action as is.
Carmon1274":15m97oqs said:JSeahawks":15m97oqs said:No. There's enough breaks in the action as is.
So when Kam hit VD, you're ok with the flag?
JSeahawks":31qg4667 said:Carmon1274":31qg4667 said:JSeahawks":31qg4667 said:No. There's enough breaks in the action as is.
So when Kam hit VD, you're ok with the flag?
It was a bad call. But there's 100's of missed calls on holds, block in the backs, and everything else every season too. Are we going to stop the game and review those?
There's a human element to officiating, and i'm perfectly fine with that.
dukestar":dewgwe3v said:Since the NFL is changing the game to eliminate certain types of hits and to ensure the game is not made into a flag football league then I think they will have to have a review process of hits like Chancellor's on Davis. If they don't, then legal hits will be flagged as fouls and slowly players will begin to hold back. In fact later on in the SF Chancellor pulled back when he had a chance to lay a big hit. So I am all for a review process.
The NFL should follow what the NHL does and have a central location do all reviews instead of having the game ref do it. That could save some time maybe.
Bigpumpkin":47c3w96m said:dukestar":47c3w96m said:Since the NFL is changing the game to eliminate certain types of hits and to ensure the game is not made into a flag football league then I think they will have to have a review process of hits like Chancellor's on Davis. If they don't, then legal hits will be flagged as fouls and slowly players will begin to hold back. In fact later on in the SF Chancellor pulled back when he had a chance to lay a big hit. So I am all for a review process.
The NFL should follow what the NHL does and have a central location do all reviews instead of having the game ref do it. That could save some time maybe.
The games are now already being stretched to allow more and more TV commercials....ie. there is more commercial time than playing time. Adding more time for reviews will further degrade the product....NFL football.
twelfman":36fbjym0 said:They should just include penalties as something reviewable, you still only get two and it takes a time out if your'e wrong<BR nodeIndex="1">Refs make mistakes all the time
JSeahawks":3iha635b said:No. There's enough breaks in the action as is.
hawker84":38rgeq72 said:JSeahawks":38rgeq72 said:No. There's enough breaks in the action as is.
i understand what you're saying, delaying games even more to review.. but something has to be done... not only are costly wrong penalties being called, but it's effecting the way the safties are now playing.. much more timid, and scared to lay a hit, therefore the recievers are not as worried going over the middle.. cause and effect in a negative way IMO.. this rule has to be examined in the off season. hell i'd be fine with just paying the players more so they can afford the penalties, as long as the bad calls went both ways... ( not really )