 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
SeaTown81
|
Post subject: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?"  Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:47 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 4047
Location: Seattle, WA
|
I'm a realist. Going up against glory boys, Luck & RG3, I don't expect Wilson to actually win ROY. All I want is for Russell to be recognized as in the picture. This from Bill Simmons' latest: http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/876 ... y-mailbaglQuote: By the way, is there a reason Russell Wilson isn't being mentioned for Rookie of the Year?
Wilson: 2,697 yards, 21 TDs, 9 INTs, 95.5 rating, 68.7 QBR, 402 rushing yards (3 TDs), 9-5 record.
Luck: 3,978 yards, 20 TDs, 18 INTs, 75.5 rating, 65.5 QBR, 233 rushing yards (5 TDs), 9-5 record.
Griffin: 2,902 yards, 18 TDs, 4 INTs, 104.2 rating, 71.3 QBR, 748 rushing yards (6 TDs), 7-6 record.
Can we at least say Griffin is leading, but it's still up in the air? Also, check out this Luck vs. Wilson post and tell me this isn't a conversation. I predict that Cris Collinsworth brings this up by midway through the second quarter on Sunday night. When he mentions Luck vs Wilson, he links to Sando's comparison of shared opponents. Love seeing that bit of statistical analysis getting a larger audience. Bout damn time people started taking notice. _________________ LET'S RALLY TO BUILD A NEW HOME
FOR THE SEATTLE SUPERSONICS!SonicsArena.com | #SonicsArena Like on Facebook & follow on Twitter to show support! http://www.facebook.com/sonicsarenahttp://www.twitter.com/sonicsarena
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Missing_Clink
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 3:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am
Posts: 1100
|
|
I dont think there is any question that Wilson is now in the discussion. I think almost all the national pundits would now agree that he is a viable candidate. Would they vote for him over the 2 season long media darlings? I doubt it, but if the Hawks win out and the Redskins miss the playoffs I think it is possible.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Greenhell
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 1830
|
Just heard on The Dan Patrick show and both he and Michael Wilbon agreed that Russ should be ROY. 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
THA SEA MONSTA
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:12 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:13 pm
Posts: 21
|
|
i feel like theres absolutely no doubt he should be just look at tha stats but one thing i noticed and is probably what tha voters will look at is rg3 was rotw 7 times lucc was 6 times and russ was 1 time so far, they wil use that as reason to say rg3 was more constant year round and therefore he deserves it, either way win or ose im beyond pumped we finally have our team
_________________
BO$$ FAMILY OFFICIAL$ CEO & HAWK GANG OG
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:12 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9704
|
|
Yeah, he plays for the Seahawks.
_________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:17 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 6446
|
|
Guys. In Vegas before the season started they had odds on who would win this award. Wilson wasn't even included by name!!!
If you wanted to bet he would win the award you had to take 'The field/Other' at about 25/1 or better!!!
On edit, I think it was even more than 25-1. Even LaMichael James was given a number....
_________________
"Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
Last edited by bestfightstory on Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Tech Worlds
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:19 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
Posts: 6897
Location: Granite Falls, WA
|
bestfightstory wrote: Guys. In Vegas before the season started they had odds on who would win this award. Wilson wasn't even included by name!!!
If you wanted to bet he would win the award you had to take 'The field/Other' at about 25/1 or better!!! Did Largent80 put 1000 bucks down? _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:24 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm
Posts: 6446
|
Tech Worlds wrote: bestfightstory wrote: Guys. In Vegas before the season started they had odds on who would win this award. Wilson wasn't even included by name!!!
If you wanted to bet he would win the award you had to take 'The field/Other' at about 25/1 or better!!! Did Largent80 put 1000 bucks down? I am quite certain he will insist he did.
_________________
"Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:24 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 993
Location: The 5-0
|
|
Despite missing almost 2 games (I say that as a negative), the numbers above would make me vote for RG3 for ROTY. That;s not considering the offenses they lead...just numbers. Now ask me who the better QB is and I will say RW, without hesitation.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seaman
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:25 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:12 am
Posts: 220
|
Tech Worlds wrote: bestfightstory wrote: Guys. In Vegas before the season started they had odds on who would win this award. Wilson wasn't even included by name!!!
If you wanted to bet he would win the award you had to take 'The field/Other' at about 25/1 or better!!! Did Largent80 put 1000 bucks down? I've never "lol'ed" more at anything you've ever written! And he's already on the way to pick up his check!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Steve2222
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:40 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 7:12 am
Posts: 366
|
|
ESPN had a Facebook Poll today who should win the OROY and Wilson won in a landslide.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:48 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
Steve2222 wrote: ESPN had a Facebook Poll today who should win the OROY and Wilson won in a landslide. Yet Luck and RG3 have won the fan vote for the pro bowl in a landslide. Conspiracy.....
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:53 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
Posts: 6335
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
|
Mark Schlereth said yesterday on NFL Live Wilson was his choice for ROY.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: Simmons: "Is there a reason Wilson isn't in ROY discussion?" Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2012 5:05 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 993
Location: The 5-0
|
hawksfansinceday1 wrote: Mark Schlereth said yesterday on NFL Live Wilson was his choice for ROY. He has never been pro-Hawk, so when he makes a comment like this, that's really saying something.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 14 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: arghawkfan, Attyla the Hawk, BamaHawk, Barthawk, bearhawk, bellingerga, Blitzer88, Cartire, Cirmman, Clayfighter, dbmack, DSM, Evil_Shenanigans, Fitz the Ram, grizbob, Hawkfish, HawkinInLA, hawksfansinceday1, hedgehawk, horns_n_hawks, HoustonHawk82, HunnyBadger, Jadow, JKent82, Kixkahn, LyndseyG, Missing_Clink, muxpux, oldhawkfan, PrepntheSep, rjdriver, RolandDeschain, Sarlacc83, seahawksTopGear, Shock2k, SHOCKER315, SirTed, Spleenhawk2.0, stack, TheHawkster, TorontoHawk, volsunghawk, WindCityHawk, xCalibur, Zukistubbs and 174 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
