We are 0-3 on Fox games; 3-0 on CBS

Jerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
6,263
Reaction score
3,138
Location
Spokane, WA
Just a completely random topic I thought I'd share here if it hasn't been mentioned.
This season we're 0-3 on Fox televised games, 3-0 on CBS, 1-0 on ESPN and 1-0 on NBC.
Just something to chew on and file away as a coincidence I suppose.

Hopefully this week we can get our first win on Fox! :th2thumbs:
 

tom sawyer

New member
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
1,737
Reaction score
0
We're undefeated in games where we had more points than our opponents when the game clock expired!
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,613
If we can't beat the Giants at home, then this is truly a worthy jinx.
 

Hawks46

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7,498
Reaction score
0
Crap. Time to go change my fearless prediction post.
 

253hawk

Active member
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Messages
3,322
Reaction score
15
Location
PNW
Clearly we need Joe Buck calling during FOX games.
 

HawkWow

New member
Joined
Sep 3, 2012
Messages
6,740
Reaction score
0
Location
The 5-0
I had to laugh when I saw this thread. Not because of the OP's point, but it reminded me of a guy I knew That had some of the craziest betting systems (notions) ever known and would lay rather large, ONLY betting games he could watch on TV.
 

fenderbender123

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
12,371
Reaction score
2,530
tom sawyer":1gcyh545 said:
We're undefeated in games where we had more points than our opponents when the game clock expired!

Link?
 

253hawk

Active member
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Messages
3,322
Reaction score
15
Location
PNW
fenderbender123":26emmj11 said:
tom sawyer":26emmj11 said:
We're undefeated in games where we had more points than our opponents when the game clock expired!

Link?

Probably a John Madden-ism.
 

NINEster

Well-known member
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
2,071
Reaction score
59
Wasn't there a Packers or Saints fan that came on here earlier in the season who proclaimed that the Broncos and Giants would either outright beat the Seahawks or cover the spread based on last year's blowout losses -- the idea being that there was a trend in the league that teams rarely ever follow up those big wins with similar performances regardless of the quality of team play. And he was contending this with the games a season apart.

I remember two years ago against the Giants, the 49ers were coming off two huge blowout wins over the Jets and Bills -- combined score of 79-3. And there was a stat that said that teams that won two combined games in a row by a huge margin (around 50+ points or something) were set up for a let down at an alarmingly high percentage rate -- very low winning percentage historically, maybe between 10-20%.

And sure enough the Giants beat the 49ers 26-3. On paper the 49ers had improved from the previous season while the Giants dropped slightly. There should have been motivation and focus to play them given the result of the prior year's NFC Championship game. At worst that game should have been a lot closer.

I also tend to look at ESPN's pigskin pick 'em for clues too. They keep track of every team's performance straight up and against the spread and often find weird stats that are eerie going against the heavily favored team. When the 49ers went in to play Minnesota two years ago there was a stat that said the Niners hadn't covered the spread in the Metrodome since 1992 or so, nor won straight up in quite a long time. They went into that game and played pretty poorly and more or less lost the game by halftime.

That game also followed two authoritative (although not huge point spread) wins over Green Bay and Detroit to open the season.

Trends are worth paying attention to because they play into the Any Given Sunday aspect. Although I only look into the trends after analyzing everything else.

If you consider the Giants loss to Colts a blowout, then that typically bodes well for the Giants coming into this game regardless of opponent. You saw how well the Jets played Denver after the shellacking against San Diego? Stuff like that.

I believe the Giants lose this game because they're not that good of a team right now, but I don't foresee a blowout loss or shutout. And quite frankly, the last two Seahawk games at CenturyLink have not been stellar performances by the home team.
 
Joined
May 3, 2009
Messages
424
Reaction score
9
NINEster":110skikf said:
Wasn't there a Packers or Saints fan that came on here earlier in the season who proclaimed that the Broncos and Giants would either outright beat the Seahawks or cover the spread based on last year's blowout losses -- the idea being that there was a trend in the league that teams rarely ever follow up those big wins with similar performances regardless of the quality of team play. And he was contending this with the games a season apart.

I remember two years ago against the Giants, the 49ers were coming off two huge blowout wins over the Jets and Bills -- combined score of 79-3. And there was a stat that said that teams that won two combined games in a row by a huge margin (around 50+ points or something) were set up for a let down at an alarmingly high percentage rate -- very low winning percentage historically, maybe between 10-20%.

And sure enough the Giants beat the 49ers 26-3. On paper the 49ers had improved from the previous season while the Giants dropped slightly. There should have been motivation and focus to play them given the result of the prior year's NFC Championship game. At worst that game should have been a lot closer.

I also tend to look at ESPN's pigskin pick 'em for clues too. They keep track of every team's performance straight up and against the spread and often find weird stats that are eerie going against the heavily favored team. When the 49ers went in to play Minnesota two years ago there was a stat that said the Niners hadn't covered the spread in the Metrodome since 1992 or so, nor won straight up in quite a long time. They went into that game and played pretty poorly and more or less lost the game by halftime.

That game also followed two authoritative (although not huge point spread) wins over Green Bay and Detroit to open the season.

Trends are worth paying attention to because they play into the Any Given Sunday aspect. Although I only look into the trends after analyzing everything else.

If you consider the Giants loss to Colts a blowout, then that typically bodes well for the Giants coming into this game regardless of opponent. You saw how well the Jets played Denver after the shellacking against San Diego? Stuff like that.

I believe the Giants lose this game because they're not that good of a team right now, but I don't foresee a blowout loss or shutout. And quite frankly, the last two Seahawk games at CenturyLink have not been stellar performances by the home team.

...*Quickly races to Google to see who has the Superb Owl this year*...
 

themunn

Well-known member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
3,948
Reaction score
466
NINEster":5zpaoqr0 said:
Wasn't there a Packers or Saints fan that came on here earlier in the season who proclaimed that the Broncos and Giants would either outright beat the Seahawks or cover the spread based on last year's blowout losses -- the idea being that there was a trend in the league that teams rarely ever follow up those big wins with similar performances regardless of the quality of team play. And he was contending this with the games a season apart.

I remember two years ago against the Giants, the 49ers were coming off two huge blowout wins over the Jets and Bills -- combined score of 79-3. And there was a stat that said that teams that won two combined games in a row by a huge margin (around 50+ points or something) were set up for a let down at an alarmingly high percentage rate -- very low winning percentage historically, maybe between 10-20%.

And sure enough the Giants beat the 49ers 26-3. On paper the 49ers had improved from the previous season while the Giants dropped slightly. There should have been motivation and focus to play them given the result of the prior year's NFC Championship game. At worst that game should have been a lot closer.

I also tend to look at ESPN's pigskin pick 'em for clues too. They keep track of every team's performance straight up and against the spread and often find weird stats that are eerie going against the heavily favored team. When the 49ers went in to play Minnesota two years ago there was a stat that said the Niners hadn't covered the spread in the Metrodome since 1992 or so, nor won straight up in quite a long time. They went into that game and played pretty poorly and more or less lost the game by halftime.

That game also followed two authoritative (although not huge point spread) wins over Green Bay and Detroit to open the season.

Trends are worth paying attention to because they play into the Any Given Sunday aspect. Although I only look into the trends after analyzing everything else.

If you consider the Giants loss to Colts a blowout, then that typically bodes well for the Giants coming into this game regardless of opponent. You saw how well the Jets played Denver after the shellacking against San Diego? Stuff like that.

I believe the Giants lose this game because they're not that good of a team right now, but I don't foresee a blowout loss or shutout. And quite frankly, the last two Seahawk games at CenturyLink have not been stellar performances by the home team.

I remember 2 years ago the Seahawks coming off of two massive blowout wins of a combined 108-17.
Ah the memories, the next game was the sweetest of the lot. Do you remember that one? Do you?
 
Top