seabowl
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2009
- Messages
- 4,544
- Reaction score
- 1,406
Both getting and giving up picks we stink. WTF?
dumbrabbit":16h4whpv said:That's why we post on forums and Schneider is the GM.
seabowl":3elrs3pl said:dumbrabbit":3elrs3pl said:That's why we post on forums and Schneider is the GM.
????
You don't have to be an NFL GM to understand draft pick position value. I would be curious to see what the chart says for what we traded away for the 1 pick.
dumbrabbit":2a8ukibq said:seabowl":2a8ukibq said:dumbrabbit":2a8ukibq said:That's why we post on forums and Schneider is the GM.
????
You don't have to be an NFL GM to understand draft pick position value. I would be curious to see what the chart says for what we traded away for the 1 pick.
They have like what, 11? 12 picks? They weren't going to use them all, so obviously they were going to make some trades and the most obvious way to get rid of them was to trade up for players that they need.
Hardly any teams do pick for pick swaps to give up their spot in the draft.
two dog":2rivoe6y said:He's worth it.
Lockette was the only must stop guy on K-State's team and nobody could.
You may say WTF now but when you see him play you will feel differently.
seabowl":1gupmbj5 said:dumbrabbit":1gupmbj5 said:That's why we post on forums and Schneider is the GM.
????
You don't have to be an NFL GM to understand draft pick position value. I would be curious to see what the chart says for what we traded away for the 1 pick.
two dog":2e8tk3nt said:He's worth it.
Lockette was the only must stop guy on K-State's team and nobody could.
You may say WTF now but when you see him play you will feel differently.
That's not a valid answer.dumbrabbit":8kecbh6l said:That's why we post on forums and Schneider is the GM.
The OP looks extremely foolish, we actually got the better end of the tradeWenhawk":20qxepxt said:seabowl":20qxepxt said:dumbrabbit":20qxepxt said:That's why we post on forums and Schneider is the GM.
????
You don't have to be an NFL GM to understand draft pick position value. I would be curious to see what the chart says for what we traded away for the 1 pick.
According to the trade value chart we got a good deal by not having to give up a 7th rd pick too
We got
69= 245
Gave up
95=120
112=70
167=24.6
181=19
Total 233.6
Hahahahahahahahabjornanderson21":13s81vuq said:That's not a valid answer.dumbrabbit":13s81vuq said:That's why we post on forums and Schneider is the GM.
Matt Millen was a GM for a number of years.
While the Hawks have had some success with trades (clemons, lynch) the majority have been losers, including the worst move in Seahawks history and one of the worst in NFL history: the Harvin trade. We gave up more and paid more and got less in return than pretty much any trade ever. Harvin literally made MILLIONS with an S at the end PER GAME. He made more in 1 game than most of our players make in a season, and he was garbage on the field.
Fans have every reason to wonder why we lose trades more often than other teams. Hell, Schneider got that ball rolling all the way back with Whitehurst. It has been a recurring theme.
It is a testament to far a team can go with a truly elite defense and an efficient QB and tough bruising RB, that we can lose trades badly, draft poorly in the 1st, overpay FAs (both our own and from other teams) and still remain under the cap and THE BEST team in the NFL.