Taking a Break from the Lock vs Geno QB Controversy

bsuhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
458
Reaction score
468
Here's a video that shows the mayhem that existed in the NFL back in the day. And in case you are wondering, with a few exceptions, the hits in this video were legal back then. The level of abuse QBs used to endure was truly amazing.

 

Scout

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2021
Messages
1,409
Reaction score
1,780
Most of those tackles and hits were legal up to the 2000s. That is when the NFL started to change drastically. Then 2010s was another turning point.

You can see this based on which defenses were dominant on their way to Super Bowls.
 

Weadoption

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
1,095
Reaction score
730
it’s the money.
you have the protect the qb’s because reasons.
 

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
8,014
Reaction score
1,652
The newer fan who thinks today's QB's are the greatest
should watch this to understand why they didn't pass so
much or put up pretty stat lines.
It wasn't because of talent but because you'd get killed
taking hit after hit after you released the ball seconds prior.
The rules of then allowed all to be fair game and nothing
was easy like parts of today are with all the rules protecting
the QB and WR's thus allowing all these pretty numbers.
I have thought about a QB like Marino or Montana who had to
play with the rules of then, can you imagine the numbers they
would put up in with today's game?
Can you say the same if you flipped one of today's elites to then?
I seriously cannot for durability reasons alone.
Brady, Manning and Favre (all ret) who actually had to play early on
under parts of what used to be allowed would be fine but how many
others can you think of?
 

Cyrus12

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
17,609
Reaction score
4,964
Location
North of the Wall
The newer fan who thinks today's QB's are the greatest
should watch this to understand why they didn't pass so
much or put up pretty stat lines.
It wasn't because of talent but because you'd get killed
taking hit after hit after you released the ball seconds prior.
The rules of then allowed all to be fair game and nothing
was easy like parts of today are with all the rules protecting
the QB and WR's thus allowing all these pretty numbers.
I have thought about a QB like Marino or Montana who had to
play with the rules of then, can you imagine the numbers they
would put up in with today's game?
Can you say the same if you flipped one of today's elites to then?
I seriously cannot for durability reasons alone.
Brady, Manning and Favre (all ret) who actually had to play early on
under parts of what used to be allowed would be fine but how many
others can you think of?
It really started to change after golden boy Brady got his knee torqued and cost him a season. That was not good for nfl business. Even for years after it really depended on who the qb was that took the hit if it was gonna result in a penalty. Brady Manning...couldn't touch these guys with any style of a punishing hit...but other guys were getting killed and not getting any calls. Scam Newton comes to mind as did Russ who would get slammed by guys like Clay Matthews with late hits and never get called. Seems to have evened out now mostly.

I thought Favre was gonna die in the bountygate game vs NO. He was getting killed. I've seen some old clips of shots Montana used to take and not sure how he got up after.
 
Last edited:

Cyrus12

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
17,609
Reaction score
4,964
Location
North of the Wall
I don't think it's working, lol. How many starting QBs have missed games this year? How many are out for the year?

...nfl logic is dumb.
That's why the next step is to reduce hitting styles which they are starting next year and my guess is full change to flag football in 2030.
 

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
8,014
Reaction score
1,652
It really started to change after golden boy Brady got his knee torqued and cost him a season. That was not good for nfl business. Even for years after it really depended on who the qb was that took the hit if it was gonna result in a penalty. Brady Manning...couldn't touch these guys with any style of a punishing hit...but other guys were getting killed and not getting any calls. Scam Newton comes to mind as did Russ who would get slammed by guys like Clay Matthews with late hits and never get called. Seems to have evened out now mostly.

I thought Favre was gonna die in the bountygate game vs NO. He was getting killed. I've seen some old clips of shots Montana used to take and not sure how he got up after.
Bountygate was year long thing but climaxed in that NFC title game.
Me and friends watching were feeling pretty bad for Favre and the refs
were just letting it happen.
It took all that for the Saints to win for a Katrina feel good story.
I still remember that ankle being the size of a grapefruit and feeling
sick.
 
OP
OP
B

bsuhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
458
Reaction score
468
The newer fan who thinks today's QB's are the greatest
should watch this to understand why they didn't pass so
much or put up pretty stat lines.
It wasn't because of talent but because you'd get killed
taking hit after hit after you released the ball seconds prior.
The rules of then allowed all to be fair game and nothing
was easy like parts of today are with all the rules protecting
the QB and WR's thus allowing all these pretty numbers.
I have thought about a QB like Marino or Montana who had to
play with the rules of then, can you imagine the numbers they
would put up in with today's game?
Can you say the same if you flipped one of today's elites to then?
I seriously cannot for durability reasons alone.
Brady, Manning and Favre (all ret) who actually had to play early on
under parts of what used to be allowed would be fine but how many
others can you think of?
Marino would be an absolute beast in today's game. He, Elway, and Namath are probably the best arms I've seen.
 

AROS

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
19,063
Reaction score
7,928
Location
Sultan, WA
The newer fan who thinks today's QB's are the greatest
should watch this to understand why they didn't pass so
much or put up pretty stat lines.
It wasn't because of talent but because you'd get killed
taking hit after hit after you released the ball seconds prior.
The rules of then allowed all to be fair game and nothing
was easy like parts of today are with all the rules protecting
the QB and WR's thus allowing all these pretty numbers.
I have thought about a QB like Marino or Montana who had to
play with the rules of then, can you imagine the numbers they
would put up in with today's game?
Can you say the same if you flipped one of today's elites to then?
I seriously cannot for durability reasons alone.
Brady, Manning and Favre (all ret) who actually had to play early on
under parts of what used to be allowed would be fine but how many
others can you think of?

You write in a poetry format. I'm now a fan of you.
 

bigskydoc

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
4,113
Reaction score
1,443
Location
Kalispell, MT
The newer fan who thinks today's QB's are the greatest
should watch this to understand why they didn't pass so
much or put up pretty stat lines.

Same with the fans who think the legendary defenses of yester year (Purple People Eaters, Monsters of the Midway, etc) would somehow be as dominant today, or who believe that a team can find success in the current era if it was built in the mold of those teams. It was just a totally different game.

Sad to say, it's not about player safety. It's about billionaires protecting their product/ bottom line.
 

Cyrus12

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
17,609
Reaction score
4,964
Location
North of the Wall
Bountygate was year long thing but climaxed in that NFC title game.
Me and friends watching were feeling pretty bad for Favre and the refs
were just letting it happen.
It took all that for the Saints to win for a Katrina feel good story.
I still remember that ankle being the size of a grapefruit and feeling
sick.
Yep that win was all about Katrina.
 

fenderbender123

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
12,363
Reaction score
2,523
it’s the money.
you have the protect the qb’s because reasons.
And what I don't like is that the NFL is still extremely profitable even when QBs get injured more often. They just can't help themselves but try and eak out a few extra million a year with all these rules that keep casuals tuning in and spending money.
 

fenderbender123

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 9, 2012
Messages
12,363
Reaction score
2,523
Tom Brady made some great points about all these rules changes over the decades. He argued that it's making offensive players, including QBs, less likely to try and protect themselves, because they know defenders are weary about being penalized.

I agree with him, but I know that somebody could probably point to stats about injuries to justify the rules. Personally, I think it's best to let the balance happen naturally, and relax all these rules. If players and teams care about protecting themselves, then they can take measures to do so on the field when they play. Don't take big risks. If that costs them games, and that's a problem, then they need to figure out how to balance it all without watering down the game with bogus rules.

Personally, I love big hits. I get so excited when my team is delivering them. It's one of the things that made the game so great.
 

bigskydoc

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
4,113
Reaction score
1,443
Location
Kalispell, MT
Tom Brady made some great points about all these rules changes over the decades. He argued that it's making offensive players, including QBs, less likely to try and protect themselves, because they know defenders are weary about being penalized.

I agree with him, but I know that somebody could probably point to stats about injuries to justify the rules. Personally, I think it's best to let the balance happen naturally, and relax all these rules. If players and teams care about protecting themselves, then they can take measures to do so on the field when they play. Don't take big risks. If that costs them games, and that's a problem, then they need to figure out how to balance it all without watering down the game with bogus rules.

Personally, I love big hits. I get so excited when my team is delivering them. It's one of the things that made the game so great.
I agree, but this has nothing to do with players and player safety.
 

Boohman14

Well-known member
Joined
May 4, 2016
Messages
442
Reaction score
436
Location
Salem Oregon
Marino would be an absolute beast in today's game. He, Elway, and Namath are probably the best arms I've seen.
Did you ever see Bert Jones of the Colts? He had a cannon and was accurate. But he got the crap beat out of him every Sunday. Another was Steve Bartkowski of Atlanta. He was amazing when healthy but he took some brutal hits. Intimidation was part of the game back then.
Plus look at how the O-line had to block in those days. There was no grabbing of shoulder pads then. Arms could not be extended, except in pass blocking and only short jabs.
 

LastRideOut

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
1,211
Reaction score
1,448
My son, who plays left tackle, says they are coached to punch D-linemen in the stomach so they don't try batting down balls. Smart.
 
OP
OP
B

bsuhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
458
Reaction score
468
Did you ever see Bert Jones of the Colts? He had a cannon and was accurate. But he got the crap beat out of him every Sunday. Another was Steve Bartkowski of Atlanta. He was amazing when healthy but he took some brutal hits. Intimidation was part of the game back then.
Plus look at how the O-line had to block in those days. There was no grabbing of shoulder pads then. Arms could not be extended, except in pass blocking and only short jabs.
Both were excellent QBs. If I remember correctly, Bert Jones won an MVP in the mid-seventies. Both were very good QBs on teams that, for the most part, weren't very good.
 

Latest posts

Top