ivotuk":2ldvjkp8 said:Pariah was looking for reasons to overturn the TD. "If he is going down on his own he has to maintain possession of the ball but if he is forced down by the defensive player then it's a TD." He was trying to say that if Rice went down on his own and lost the ball it was a fumble which is BS because he broke the plane and once that happens it is a TD.
Zebulon Dak":3md51jdw said:ivotuk":3md51jdw said:Pariah was looking for reasons to overturn the TD. "If he is going down on his own he has to maintain possession of the ball but if he is forced down by the defensive player then it's a TD." He was trying to say that if Rice went down on his own and lost the ball it was a fumble which is BS because he broke the plane and once that happens it is a TD.
That's what I thought. What a wanker.
ivotuk":31fo6ivn said:Pariah was looking for reasons to overturn the TD. "If he is going down on his own he has to maintain possession of the ball but if he is forced down by the defensive player then it's a TD." He was trying to say that if Rice went down on his own and lost the ball it was a fumble which is BS because he broke the plane and once that happens it is a TD.
razor150":2m082dwo said:ivotuk":2m082dwo said:Pariah was looking for reasons to overturn the TD. "If he is going down on his own he has to maintain possession of the ball but if he is forced down by the defensive player then it's a TD." He was trying to say that if Rice went down on his own and lost the ball it was a fumble which is BS because he broke the plane and once that happens it is a TD.
Yeah, otherwise spiking the ball would be a fumble