Erebus
Active member
The upside to rooting for the 9ers is so hopefully Chip Kelly keeps his job another year.
Optimus25":2ses6w72 said:byau":2ses6w72 said:johnnyfever":2ses6w72 said:This is the only one up there that wants an NFC divisional to win. I would like to keep the pats out of HFA. Let them be tired out like we might be when we see them in the Super Bowl. Niners are damn near eliminated, so I made the call.Steve2222":2ses6w72 said:Why would the 49ers beating the Patriots benefit Seattle?
This is a strange one, because the more wins the Patriots get, the stronger our win against the Patriots is, and that's also a tiebreaker in there somewhere.
The only reason you'd want the Patriots to not get HFA is because you don't want to meet them in the SB and that's a lot farther down the line.
I'd rather the Seahawks get the strongest possible chance to get HFA and the Patriots winning out makes our win against them stronger at this point which will possibly count for something.
Let me go full wrapped around the axles here.... Wouldn't sf winning increase our sos especially since we play them twice?
Seahawk Sailor":14upletb said:should Cleveland get a win or two.
Erebus":2qlwv2a6 said:The upside to rooting for the 9ers is so hopefully Chip Kelly keeps his job another year.
byau":te815a6k said:kidhawk":te815a6k said:Polaris":te815a6k said:It does. Strength of opponent wins is something like fifth or sixth in the tiebreakers. I remember last year when we were trying to chase down Arizona that this tiebreak was potentially important.
The likelihood of us needing a tiebreaker of any sort is very low, and to need that many tiebreakers is insanely unlikely. Our tie with the Cardinals means that it's unlikely we'll need any tie breaking scenarios this year.
Every bit helps though and I can't see any upside to having the Pats losing.
Crizilla":1vah4n6a said:Too early for this stuff. Calm down
Sgt. Largent":1vpoea9u said:Seahawk Sailor":1vpoea9u said:should Cleveland get a win or two.
Woo good one!
johnnyfever":2puayzev said:Crizilla":2puayzev said:Too early for this stuff. Calm down
Yeah, everyone is just flipping out. Might want to take your own advice brah. Don't click just to troll.
johnnyfever":g50xi99h said:Basically boils down to wanting nfc teams with bad records to beat nfc teams with good records. Too far out to start rooting for certain afc teams to get matchups we want in the postseason. That will come with about 3 weeks left. I watch football all day sunday and track most teams, especially our upcoming opponents (weaknesses, strengths, playmakers etc), so I figured I would share. This is just so we have the best chance at getting the 1 seed and HFA. Yes, this info is easy to find and figure out, but now you can be lazy. It will get more complicated and subjective the closer we get and include AFC. For now I have left off AFC-AFC games. Each week will be rated as a differential. This way, even if we lose, but have a +4 differential on the teams we needed to lose/win, it's not as bad.
Tonight:
bengals-giants
ROOT FOR: BENGALS -1
Thursday:
saints -panthers
ROOT FOR: PANTHERS +1
Sunday:
10:00:
cards-vikings
ROOT FOR: VIKINGS +1
bears-giants
ROOT FOR: BEARS-1
jaguars-lions
ROOT FOR: JAGS-1
bucs-chiefs
ROOT FOR: CHIEFS-1
ravens-cowboys
ROOT FOR: RAVENS-1
1:00
dolphins-rams
ROOT FOROLPHINS+1
pats-9ers
ROOT FOR: 9ERS 0*
packers-redskins
ROOT FORACKERS+1
eagles-hawks
ROOT FOR: DERP +1