OMG, on a 49er forum about can the Seahawks be dethroned
- Thread starter hawkpride
- Start date
RichNhansom
Active member
- Joined
- May 25, 2011
- Messages
- 4,256
- Reaction score
- 5
The Denial zone is not like on here. You really need to ignore anything negative about Seattle and that truly is 99% of the posts and in return you need to respect them and pay homage to their history and this is all while they are trashing anything Seahawks and based on nothing but buthurt opinion.
You need to ignore they have been busted for cheating and lost draft picks for it while they insist anything Seattle does is cheating. Respect their history while ignoring the cheating and an owner that was convicted of a felony while he owned the team and was bribing government officials and trying to open casino's, all during their dynasty years.
Accept that according to them every Seahawk is on PED's and ignore the reality of all the criminal activity happening in their locker room.
Accept the league is helping Seattle to win the division and holding them back by not making calls they feel they deserve or by calling roughing the passer against them even though that call would have been made 100 out of 100 times vs any team and accept that the LOB is only any good because they hold, maul, tackle and rape every receiver all the way down the field.
Yes the tinfoil hats over there believe the league is purposely holding them back and helping Seattle. Why would the NFL do that? I don't know, no one has ever given any kind of explanation for that theory it apparently just is. Even though they rarely complain about actual bad calls other than they're interpretation of the Breeze hit instead they complain about calls they didn't get.
A good example of the difference is the Bowman strip when he tore his knee up. Every Seahawk fan I know or have ever read agrees it was a bad call but the Crabtree fumble where the official changed his ruling to prevent Pete from challenging is easily explained away. Other than the game day thread when it happened and right as it happened was it even questioned by Niner fans and even then the comments were they deserved the call because they were owed.
You can't have any kind of real conversation over there. It's nothing but insults and tin foil analysis. If you try and disagree with them and provide facts to do so you are band. We give Marvin Shit but we let him speak and even though we mostly see through his cover up and spinning we haven't banned him for it. Over on the zone his style wouldn't get three posts in.
You need to ignore they have been busted for cheating and lost draft picks for it while they insist anything Seattle does is cheating. Respect their history while ignoring the cheating and an owner that was convicted of a felony while he owned the team and was bribing government officials and trying to open casino's, all during their dynasty years.
Accept that according to them every Seahawk is on PED's and ignore the reality of all the criminal activity happening in their locker room.
Accept the league is helping Seattle to win the division and holding them back by not making calls they feel they deserve or by calling roughing the passer against them even though that call would have been made 100 out of 100 times vs any team and accept that the LOB is only any good because they hold, maul, tackle and rape every receiver all the way down the field.
Yes the tinfoil hats over there believe the league is purposely holding them back and helping Seattle. Why would the NFL do that? I don't know, no one has ever given any kind of explanation for that theory it apparently just is. Even though they rarely complain about actual bad calls other than they're interpretation of the Breeze hit instead they complain about calls they didn't get.
A good example of the difference is the Bowman strip when he tore his knee up. Every Seahawk fan I know or have ever read agrees it was a bad call but the Crabtree fumble where the official changed his ruling to prevent Pete from challenging is easily explained away. Other than the game day thread when it happened and right as it happened was it even questioned by Niner fans and even then the comments were they deserved the call because they were owed.
You can't have any kind of real conversation over there. It's nothing but insults and tin foil analysis. If you try and disagree with them and provide facts to do so you are band. We give Marvin Shit but we let him speak and even though we mostly see through his cover up and spinning we haven't banned him for it. Over on the zone his style wouldn't get three posts in.
loafoftatupu
Active member
Marvin49":2lilzixw said:
It doesn't really matter, but I am used to Niner fans claiming victory on the "Shoulda-coulda-woulda-almost" program anyways. You're not that much different
loafoftatupu":228tbyo7 said:Marvin49":228tbyo7 said:
It doesn't really matter, but I am used to Niner fans claiming victory on the "Shoulda-coulda-woulda-almost" program anyways. You're not that much different
I'm sorry, that cracks me up....
...on one thread I have you talking about Niner fans and the "Shoulda-Coulda-Woulda" arguments and then in another when I was talking about the Niners BEATING the Packers I have Seahawks fans playing "Shoulda-Coulda-Woulda" to discredit those win.
So...essentially...talking about the reasons a game was lost is only a viable argument if the argument goes against the 49ers.
That's Cool. I got'cha.
SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
Wow, someone sure spends a LOT of time talking about the Hawks :lol:
loafoftatupu
Active member
Marvin49":26d85jii said:I'm sorry, that cracks me up....
...on one thread I have you talking about Niner fans and the "Shoulda-Coulda-Woulda" arguments and then in another when I was talking about the Niners BEATING the Packers I have Seahawks fans playing "Shoulda-Coulda-Woulda" to discredit those win.
So...essentially...talking about the reasons a game was lost is only a viable argument if the argument goes against the 49ers.
That's Cool. I got'cha.
Stay on track Marvin. I was only talking about the "winning" claim. You're all over the place. This is an example of "Marvining".
loafoftatupu
Active member
RichNhansom":1qrcf53v said:
Actually... I tallied it up and it is a legitimate 99.3 percent. +/- 0.2
UK_Seahawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
- Messages
- 4,469
- Reaction score
- 513
Sherminator":334fpsc4 said:
Not me that was just banned, I got banned ages ago.
Sherminator
New member
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2014
- Messages
- 432
- Reaction score
- 0
loafoftatupu":mkukvp1g said:
Oh god not this again
UK_Seahawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
- Messages
- 4,469
- Reaction score
- 513
Sherminator":14rf9qv7 said:
The problem is over there is that rational argument and contrary opinion is seen as trolling. That said I like to think at least I was my true self over there whereas the average niner chooses to edit themselves here and thus becomes a hypocrite compared to their true feelings on whinerzone.
Popeyejones
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2013
- Messages
- 5,525
- Reaction score
- 0
Marvin49":211h8y47 said:So...my name is in YOUR signature....
....who's really winning here....
:lol: :lol: :lol:
loafoftatupu
Active member
Dude... really?Popeyejones":2i2yasim said:Marvin49":2i2yasim said:So...my name is in YOUR signature....
....who's really winning here....
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Popeyejones
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2013
- Messages
- 5,525
- Reaction score
- 0
Really.
loafoftatupu
Active member
After tenure here, Niner fan or not, I figured even you weren't that simple. I have been wrong before.Popeyejones":2efyvz7e said:
