Marvin49":1bxdcqta said:
Laloosh..I applaud the effort, but its really pointless. Goalpost keeps moving. Niners were stuffed and then when numbers say otherwise he says they weren't as impressive as they SHOULD have been. Anytime you provide a fact or a stat he just refuses to acknowledge the statistic and says you've provided nothing.
IE, he makes a statement (Niners were stuffed, time of possession an indicator of underperformance) and then when you thoroughly discredit the notion he moves the argument on you and says that was the argument all along. Its like nailing down Jello.
Even when fans of his own team challenge him he refuses to give in because he refuses to admit he's wrong.
I know you are doing it for you and certainly not for me, but I appreciate it nonetheless. He's just a lost cause. He will most likely go into another load of BS about this post that will be full of assumptions that he'll call facts and then say all of us can't comprehend what he's saying. He'll be right too. We can't comprehend nonsense.
You can claim you have facts...but facts doesn't mean you have evidence. No goal posts have been moved you just failed to properly identify what the goal posts were from the beginning. Its pathetic really
Aristotle is rolling over in his grave with your improper use of logical fallacy.
Time of possession is a definite indicator of under performance of at least one side of your team , can you guess which? Can you guess how it varies on a throw first or a run first team? Am I arguing with a toddler?
I can't control your inability to read or think. Make a logical point and we can have a discussion you are just providing inane banter at this point.
I made a reasonable observation based on what I saw in a game. You tried to tell me my opinion was wrong with insufficient evidence.
