http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/201 ... orlea.html
17 games w/full pay, minimum. The precedent has been set with Hardy. All eyes on you Rog.
17 games w/full pay, minimum. The precedent has been set with Hardy. All eyes on you Rog.
Scottemojo":1iec0lmh said:Charges dropped.
No story here.
If I thought you were objective, I would continue.ctrcat":11gsb0sq said:Scottemojo":11gsb0sq said:Charges dropped.
No story here.
Hardy got 17 games for dropped charges. As long as a she in a he said/she said says you disgraced the SHIELD, that's what matters.
ctrcat":1lp3bt3t said:Scottemojo":1lp3bt3t said:Charges dropped.
No story here.
Hardy got 17 games for dropped charges. As long as a she in a he said/she said says you disgraced the SHIELD, that's what matters.
kidhawk":3k6o2vla said:ctrcat":3k6o2vla said:Scottemojo":3k6o2vla said:Charges dropped.
No story here.
Hardy got 17 games for dropped charges. As long as a she in a he said/she said says you disgraced the SHIELD, that's what matters.
Hardy was found guilty by a judge. He won an appeal and got a jury trial, but they couldn't find the victim to testify in the second trial, so charges got dismissed. Apples and Oranges.
Although the NFL should still investigate the matter, it's the off season, so there's plenty of time to investigate it and see if it merits any sort of punishment by the NFL.
Also, Hardy wasn't suspended the whole season, he was put on the exempt list while his legal issues were being settled. The NFL Is now, rightfully, gathering information to decide what punishment he should receive.
ctrcat":pltl5km0 said:kidhawk":pltl5km0 said:ctrcat":pltl5km0 said:Scottemojo":pltl5km0 said:Charges dropped.
No story here.
Hardy got 17 games for dropped charges. As long as a she in a he said/she said says you disgraced the SHIELD, that's what matters.
Hardy was found guilty by a judge. He won an appeal and got a jury trial, but they couldn't find the victim to testify in the second trial, so charges got dismissed. Apples and Oranges.
Although the NFL should still investigate the matter, it's the off season, so there's plenty of time to investigate it and see if it merits any sort of punishment by the NFL.
Also, Hardy wasn't suspended the whole season, he was put on the exempt list while his legal issues were being settled. The NFL Is now, rightfully, gathering information to decide what punishment he should receive.
By a judge that looks like this during a re-election year. A jury trial is the right of anyone that lives in NC. It also happened last May, and the league had plenty of time to suspend for the season opener, but they didn't. A hypocritical joke.
ctrcat":w0vzesxz said:By a judge that looks like this during a re-election year.
jkitsune":28lvvgak said:ctrcat":28lvvgak said:kidhawk":28lvvgak said:Hardy was found guilty by a judge. He won an appeal and got a jury trial, but they couldn't find the victim to testify in the second trial, so charges got dismissed. Apples and Oranges.
Although the NFL should still investigate the matter, it's the off season, so there's plenty of time to investigate it and see if it merits any sort of punishment by the NFL.
Also, Hardy wasn't suspended the whole season, he was put on the exempt list while his legal issues were being settled. The NFL Is now, rightfully, gathering information to decide what punishment he should receive.
By a judge that looks like this during a re-election year. A jury trial is the right of anyone that lives in NC. It also happened last May, and the league had plenty of time to suspend for the season opener, but they didn't. A hypocritical joke.
A judge that looks like what?
A woman?
I guess I shouldn't be surprised if that's a problem for you.
Scottemojo":2tn482qr said:I agree with you that the way it was handled with Hardy was madness.
Why you want the madness to continue I have no idea beyond your hatred of a rival.
And you know Hardy paid her to go away. Which, hey, whatever, I would prefer Roger let the legal process do it's thing before he act anyway. But it doesn't make Hardy into some kind of Saint.
Scottemojo":1nj8n0lw said:I agree with you that the way it was handled with Hardy was madness.
Why you want the madness to continue I have no idea beyond your hatred of a rival.
And you know Hardy paid her to go away. Which, hey, whatever, I would prefer Roger let the legal process do it's thing before he act anyway. But it doesn't make Hardy into some kind of Saint.