Pete likely has near 100% job security for the next two years. I could see a sacking late season year two if it’s all gone to rubbish.
How he should be measured this coming year is player development and team buy-in, not by wins. It’s a rebuild, you should be willing to suffer short term for long term gains.
Year two becomes a mix of development and wins trending upward.
If you’re not a contender by year three the rebuild has failed.
This makes sense to me -
and I'd agree - his contract seems to match up/slightly longer than the 2024 'sales' thing.
And people are forgetting a basic premise: You don't fire the store manager because a cashier messes up. You fire the cashier.
Pete's got a track record at 1000 things other than RW. I'm going to give him a pass as his employer 100 times out of 100 for that.
The only reason that RW wasn't gone sooner was politics.
So, hire a new cashier. Leave the manager in place. Like my wife says: "dude you have a pass (not that kind of pass) for 1000 things that you've done well and right - not the thing that you ****** up this week!".
And contrary to popular opinion. Pete had ABSOLUTELY ALMOST NO SAY in the RW shit. That, my friends: All JS. All week and twice on Sundays. Read the JS comments.
I might be tired of some Pete shit - but the dude has a track record - even in slight contrast to my other post on this thread. We don't win an Owl without Pete. We could have won one without RW.
Having said that - if he could throw a ******* challenge flag instead of a phone - well - I can see it