Jordan Matthews:
54 receptions, 84 targets, 686 yards, 7 tds, 6.1 YAC per reception;
6'3'', 33 1/3 arm length, 212 lbs, Hand size: 10 3/8
4.46 40, 35'' vert. jump, 21 reps bench, 120'' broad, 6.95 3 cone
Paul Richardson:
14 receptions, 21 targets, 102 yards, 0 tds, 2.1 YAC per reception;
6'0'', 32 5/8 arm length, 175 lbs, Hand size: 8 7/8
4.40 40, 38 vert. jump, 7.09 3 cone, 124'' broad
Though stats are meaningless, because the offense of the two teams are so different and small sample size. I still think Jordan Matthews body type fits our offense better than Paul Richardson. Seahawks run-dominant offense should value size, and blocking ability rather than pure speed for their WRs. Richardson still scares me, that he'll break like a stick on blocks and his speed seems less a significant factor in this offense.
54 receptions, 84 targets, 686 yards, 7 tds, 6.1 YAC per reception;
6'3'', 33 1/3 arm length, 212 lbs, Hand size: 10 3/8
4.46 40, 35'' vert. jump, 21 reps bench, 120'' broad, 6.95 3 cone
Paul Richardson:
14 receptions, 21 targets, 102 yards, 0 tds, 2.1 YAC per reception;
6'0'', 32 5/8 arm length, 175 lbs, Hand size: 8 7/8
4.40 40, 38 vert. jump, 7.09 3 cone, 124'' broad
Though stats are meaningless, because the offense of the two teams are so different and small sample size. I still think Jordan Matthews body type fits our offense better than Paul Richardson. Seahawks run-dominant offense should value size, and blocking ability rather than pure speed for their WRs. Richardson still scares me, that he'll break like a stick on blocks and his speed seems less a significant factor in this offense.