Our Man in Chicago
New member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2013
- Messages
- 1,188
- Reaction score
- 0
Clayton reporting that "conditional" = 2nd to 4th round pick.
Feed the Hawk":3u00d8z2 said:Marvin49":3u00d8z2 said:bigwrm":3u00d8z2 said:Well at least they weren't too proud to recognize their mistake and make a bold move. It seems like Percy is a guy Pete was always enamored with and wanted at any cost. That trade and contract will now go down as the biggest mistake in the PC/JS era.
A lot of fans of other teams would say that's just trying to justify...
...but not this Niner fan.
The mark of a really good GM isn't that he doesn't make mistakes. Its that he quickly recognizes the mistake and rectifies it instead of pushing a bad situation. I didn't see this coming at all and as a Niner fan I didn't want to face Harvin so I'm a bit dumbfounded...
...but if it really wasn't working it a good move to move quickly.
True, this is some Art of War logic here (and props to a 9ers fan for using logic!). However, we sacrificed a ton of draft capital to do it. That and other failures in the First round post 2010 is going to come back to bite us in the ass sooner than later.
DavidSeven":2xwd8f6k said:Softy just confirmed the trade.
Percy is gone. Obviously, whatever was going on behind the scenes last year and this year couldn't be overcome.
Time to move on.
His new QB is Geno Smith, so I wouldn't hold my breath on any conditions being met.Snakeeyes007":2btxmag4 said:Perhaps a 2nd rounder that could become a 1st if Percy meets certain benchmarks, but no mid-rounder. :34853_doh:
Rocket":2oh86idp said:That was great... you crack me up.El Caliente":2oh86idp said:Who will replace Harvin's production?
^^^ thisDavidSeven":2s4j3fpx said:I'm not really buying the "this trade got us the Super Bowl argument."
Seattle had Denver outmatched with or without Harvin. He was largely a non-factor in the rest of the season.
DavidSeven":2nxuz6qx said:Oh jeez. We're really going to play the "Percy Harvin is a locker-room cancer, FIRE BEVELL" card? Really?
fridayfrenzy":3mgd4008 said:This thinking that they are doing it to free up cap space is ridiculous. They could have just cut him after the season and kept Harvin for this year if it was truly about cap space. They wouldn't have received a conditional pick in return, but the cap space would have been the same.