Are you kidding? Deshaun Watson got 5 years, $230 million with a couple dozen lawsuits hanging over him. Lamar is way more valuable than Deshaun even without that.
First I agree with the guys tweet.No way anyone in the league would offer Lamar up to 200m for 5 years Now or probably ever.
Mobile diva qbs are a poor all In investment as everyone has seen from Kyler and Russ. He will be lucky if he gets 3 years at 30m, with the first two guaranteed.
It was unintentionally homophobic, in that Lamar tried to think of the nastiest, most vulgar thing he could say to the other Twitter user, and what he came up with was saying that the person engaged in certain activities associated with a gay male lifestyle.I don't think it was homophobic - women do it all the time. It was definitely a lapse in judgement and control, however.
They are correct..It was unintentionally homophobic, in that Lamar tried to think of the nastiest, most vulgar thing he could say to the other Twitter user, and what he came up with was saying that the person engaged in certain activities associated with a gay male lifestyle.
I'd call that homophobic. Had to think about it, though, because at first it just comes off as Lamar wanted to say the most vulgar, hateful, demeaning thing possible to this person. The original comment was entirely reasonable, questioning the wisdom of giving Lamar a huge contract vs having $$$ left to build the team overall.
Lamar probably cost himself millions with that foolishness. Should be interesting to see what the Ravens do, franchise him vs. a long term contract. Personally, I think the risk is high, like RGIII, Jackson could get injured in a way that negates his mobility, (ironically, RGIII got injured while playing the Ravens) and many Ravens posters seem to think Jackson would be a below-average QB without that elite mobility and running ability.