hawks85
Well-known member
Knew nothing about this guy. I watched film and this guy is good. He's another scrappy fellow and will be a much better fit for Coach Mike's defense. I like how he doesn't over commit but instead reads and reacts.
Since this is clearly directed at me...wow. This is quite an absolutist stance from someone whose measured approach I've come to respect. We are talking about a 4th round pick here, not a 2nd or even a 3rd, so talking about Seasons™ seems like quite the mountain made out of a molehill. I could see this if it were a 2nd.Trading away draft capital for players on expiring contracts who want to get paid is never good long-term roster building. Having an extra 4th doesn't make it less valuable, and I don't like that our FO tends to treat extra picks like spare cash burning a hole in their pockets. If you don't care about this season because you think we can't win the Super Bowl, and that's all that matters, then you should dislike this move.
No Pete overseerHow is the FO different?
Good point. I think you're right about that.In fairness though you aren't taking into account the financial aspects of the deal. Baker is on a one year, $7-million deal while Ernest Jones is still on his rookie contract. Jones might've garnered a 5th or 6th if it was just him, but to take Jerome Baker and his contract off our hands, the deal was going to have to be sweeter. So, we give up a 4th as opposed to a 5th, if he becomes a long term answer at LB, and we have more cap flexibility this year to do another splash trade, is it really that bad of a deal?
Nah, man. You trying to ruin the vibe going on here? ; ) You don't have confidence MM and JS on this? H-e-dbl hockey sticks... I wouldn't be surprised Wagner had something to do with this. LolGoing by PFF, this kid has had one strong season, and he's been about as effective as Baker this season. He may be a better fit in our defense, but we'll see how much of an upgrade he is. Still, I like it. Baker wasn't the long-term solution; this kid is younger and has more upside.
That said, I wouldn't call this a splash or win-now move. Leonard Williams was a splash. He cost us a second and a fifth. While substantial, trading a rotational LB and a fourth doesn't move the needle as much.
It's only money. Keep our focus on the prize!Considering Baker's contract structure, Seattle probably won't save any money on this trade. Eighty percent of his contract value came from his signing bonus and upfront guarantees.
Nah, man. I'm just not much of a reactionary. I see people posting his PFF grades from last season as evidence of his potential impact while failing to acknowledge that PFF also ranked him below Baker and Dodson in the offseason. Why? Because he graded out as an elite run-stopper and a liability in coverage.Nah, man. You trying to ruin the vibe going on here? You don't have confidence MM and JS on this? H-e-dbl hockey sticks... I wouldn't be surprised Wagner had something to do with this. Lol
Maybe not the splash of Williams, but dang... a significant need addressed. Let's see how it plays out. LW has got to be pleased.
Follow the thread. I'm responding to the question of whether we'll save money or not.It's only money. Keep our focus on the prize!
Knownone is classy. Didn't overreact to my reply.
holds the Rams single season record for tackles.Is Jones an upgrade? Don't know much about him.
That’s great so why did the Rams give up on him? Even if it was for an injury, why wouldn’t they wait until he is better?holds the Rams single season record for tackles.
My guess is cap casualty. Dude is a bigtime downhill run stopper. crazy good signing. WOW.That’s great so why did the Rams give up on him? Even if it was for an injury, why wouldn’t they wait until he is better?
Sorry if anyone already posted this...
That part about playing the spot that Bobby once played is cool, might influence him in resigning here tooAnother cool wrinkle is that while he was with the Rams, he played alongside Bobby Wagner for a season and said it was a career changing experience for him (or something to that affect). Now, he gets to man the middle of the D that Bobby once led.
Really excited about this move. Dont get all of the skepticism. Our biggest liability on defense is not being able to stop the run. Jones addresses that weakness in a huge way in two ways - his sheer talent alone and by removing the piece only the D that was single handidly responsible for some of those big runs we surrender.
And remember Leonard William's comment about seeing some guys on D giving up and having the wrong attitude? Baker stood out more than anyone else as someone who would pretty frequently look like his head wasnt in the game and that he was playing undisciplined and at times, uninspired ball.
I think it's more along the lines that the other guy was so bad at his job this guy is an upgrade without knowing the system.Wow, are the defensive calls and scheme that similar between TN and SEA that EJ IV can step right in and perform?