Smellyman":17jq7e1d said:GeekHawk":17jq7e1d said:Cyrus12":17jq7e1d said:When Manning left the Colts they had a terrible next season...drafted Luck and problem was solved.SoulfishHawk":17jq7e1d said:Dear God make it stop. Hoping Lock will be the QB so the team can lose more and get better picks. And being excited that Russ is gone. And excited for Drew Lock??? Wow :roll:
Yeah, I remember all the Super Bowls they won after sucking for Luck. :roll: :roll: :roll:
And all the Super Bowls we won without Wilson.
There are a lot of 'franchise' QBs who haven't won super bowls. A few 'non franchise' qbs have won them too.
It is still a team game.
you think Seattle gets that Super Bowl replacing Wilson for Luck?
Yes, I agree with you.hawks85":2sxv0ss7 said:TheLegendOfBoom":2sxv0ss7 said:It could be possible that Seattle really likes this guy.
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/100 ... ade-rumors
At 6’ 4” and 230, he has the physical tools to quickly pass from the pocket, something that Wilson, doesn’t like to do.
Many have said the Broncos offense line isn’t that much better than the Seahawks last year.
I believe the Broncos has 6 less sacks than the Seahawks.
It could be entirely possible Lock played in a system that did not play to his strengths as much as Wilson will argue the Seahawks don’t play to Wilson’s desires.
Watching film for a decade on Wilson, Wilson has his deficiencies as well.
Lock, at least has potential to be something that Seattle can work with.
I believe Lock’s ceiling as a “pure pocket passer” is greater than Wilson’s.
Not to ruffle feathers but by “Pure Pocket Passer” I mean, Lock isn’t opposed to throwing short quick timing passes over the middle and playing to how the defense is setup.
Of course this is pure speculation and being a Seahawks fan just hoping Seattle can operate well with Lock but I think it will allow us all to see if Carroll and his offensive coordinators can play a “dink and dunk” scheme to switch things up.
How many times have we watched defenses play 2 deep zones on Seattle to take away Metcalf on deep routes.
I’m still a firm believer that DK can progressively refine his short area routes and became a complete imposing and dominating receiver if Seattle has a QB that can also make timing short quick passes.
I know many here are up and arms and upset Wilson is no longer in Seattle but I’m excited because I don’t want to keep doing the same things over and over and hoping for success.
Change is needed to grow sometimes.
But to each their own.
Ruffle any feathers? Go on brother just speak on it. I agree with you but I'm vocal on this and I don't give a crap who I offend. Wilson is OVERRATED. Wilson is the anti christ when it comes to a pure pocket passer. The reason why that dude runs around so much isn't because of the O-line, it's because he's to god damn short to see over the line, he can't see $h!t. Wilson is a backyard QB with a pretty rainbow pass and that's it.
At least for me, the goal of a down year has nothing to do with trying to lose games on purpose to get a high pick. If we fall into the playoffs at 8-9 and ruin our first pick that will be fine with me.hoxrox":1x4fmjr0 said:As for tanking for a high 2023 pick, who's the QB in that draft people are so high on?
Now we have a fellow Coach Holmgren supporter. The discipline is what is missing from PC's coaching. His teams have too many lineman penalties, and screw ups of time management. PRO teams should not make the same mistakes over and over again. That is a sign of poor coaching.If we had Holmgren, he might be a decent QB in 2 years. But we don’t
You weren't the only one. Go back look at my posts I was on the RW band wagon from the day he was drafted. BUT, he changed and I jumped off his wagon a couple of years ago when his ego became more important than the team or the scheme.Lock has potential and can still develop.
Let’s not forget that when we drafted Russ the majority of this forum wanted Flynn as the Qb. I got slammed for saying Russ was better. Got banned for saying Russ would be better than Hasselbeck.
How will we know? Most saw Geno as a worthless cast off backup that no one wanted to see start games until he got a few games of live ball last year. And he played better than expected.If Lock starts that's a clear indication Pete is tanking imo. Geno had a 68 comp percentage last year that's like top 5 in the league. Not saying he will do that all year but imo he's clearly better than Lock as of today.
You should say Lock will be better than Wilson. Just to see what happens.Lock has potential and can still develop.
Let’s not forget that when we drafted Russ the majority of this forum wanted Flynn as the Qb. I got slammed for saying Russ was better. Got banned for saying Russ would be better than Hasselbeck.