zhawk wrote:I believe this comment has added no value to the conversation.
WE ALL WE GOT, WE ALL WE NEED!!!!!!!!!!!
JSeahawks wrote:I've got Lanesanity.
Throwdown wrote:JSeahawks wrote:I've got Lanesanity.
Ayyyy best thing you've said in weeks!
hawksincebirth wrote:
So Russell has leverage but marshawn doesn't ? I thought its next man up. Hey we got t jack and bj Daniels right ??
zhawk wrote:I believe this comment has added no value to the conversation.
Cartire wrote:im gonna be honest, ive rewatched all the games numerous times in the last couple months and Im not as sold on Lane as others here.
Lanes biggest pro is his speed. Thus why his special team impact as a gunner has worked well for us. His play on the field shows his speed well while he was starting at CB in place of browner. But he lost receivers a few times on the all-22. Most the times, the ball wasnt thrown his way, but you could see his coverages were shaky. A lot of this can easily be attributed to lack of experience, but it can also be a telling sign. On top of that, he lacks the physical presence that we have grown accustomed to in our scheme. I know others will hate this comparison, but he reminds me a lot of Josh Wilson (but taller, thank god). Great speed, but lacks the ability to win on the line.
I wont say hes bad, or that he will be bad, but I would like to see him gain more experience and see if that helps. However, if our secondary remains healthy, special teams may be his only venture on this team for awhile. Not a bad thing by any means.
WE ALL WE GOT, WE ALL WE NEED!!!!!!!!!!!
Hawks46 wrote:I don't think Lane is suited to the Nickle/slot CB spot. I do think with experience he can be decent on the outside. His ceiling is probably somewhere around "good starter" to a bridge player. I'm more interested if Simon or Lane wins their camp battle (if Simon is healthy).
JSeahawks wrote:I've got Lanesanity.
It is currently Sun Apr 22, 2018 5:02 am
Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]