Did anyone get more than 1 pick right in their mock?

Discuss your thoughts about anything draft related. Mocks, College and Pro. Knock yourselves out!!! LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
  • Just wondering..... best I can find is 1/10 right.
    P-Rich fo life
    User avatar
    ImTheScientist
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3135
    Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am


  • I got a big fat ZERO on my final mock.
    P-Rich fo life
    User avatar
    ImTheScientist
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3135
    Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am



  • I had Williams and Harper. Harper was exact match/round. Williams was 3 rounds late.
    User avatar
    Attyla the Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1531
    Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:38 pm


  • I had Williams and Harper also. Williams in the 2nd and Harper in the 5th.
    Image]
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 8302
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: San Diego, CA


  • Anyone have more or equal than Attyla the Hawk or Flying Greg?
    P-Rich fo life
    User avatar
    ImTheScientist
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3135
    Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am


  • I got all of them right including the trades
    User avatar
    SeahawksFanForever
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2230
    Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm
    Location: Irvine, California


  • Just Williams but I had him in the 2nd rd
    User avatar
    Wenhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2794
    Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 6:38 am
    Location: Graham, WA


  • I had Christine Michael in the 2nd, but I missed the rest
    seahawks875
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 238
    Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:14 am


  • SeahawksFanForever wrote:I got all of them right including the trades

    John Schneider on .NET..........Sweet!!
    Image

    Harmlessly passing your time in the grassland away;
    Only dimly aware of a certain unease in the air.
    User avatar
    hawksfansinceday1
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 20575
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA


  • Had Harper and Simon...
    User avatar
    skater18000
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 527
    Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm


  • I had Seattle not picking anybody in the first round. Nailed that one!
    HawkGA
    NET Hall Of Famer
     
    Posts: 103680
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:29 pm


  • I picked Ty Powell in the 3rd round. Only a casual mention of Alvin Bailey as an alternate to my draft choices. That doesn't count, but I think he is a versatile lineman with SEC experience that could stick. I thought he would be drafted by about round 4. Great to get him as an UDFA. Anyone know why? (He was listed on many sites to be one of the top guards in the draft)

    Kudos to Attyla the Hawk and FlyingGreg!
    Image
    Fan since team Est. 1976
    Winner of 2013 and 2015 .net annual draft contests
    User avatar
    TeamoftheCentury
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1810
    Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:54 am
    Location: Orlando, FL


  • It was interesting...I had read several pieces on the Hawks having legitimate interest in Michael, Harper and Williams in the weeks leading up to the draft. For some reason, I "bought in" and it seemed like Williams and Harper, at least, were good fits for us.

    I didn't see Michael coming...but now that I've had a chance to analyze it after the fact, I get it and it makes sense.
    Image]
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 8302
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: San Diego, CA


  • FlyingGreg wrote:It was interesting...I had read several pieces on the Hawks having legitimate interest in Michael, Harper and Williams


    Seriously?

    I wish I had seen those articles before the draft. I knew about Michael but Williams never made sense for Seattle's 3-tech, which was proven when they took Hill over Williams in the 3rd round. Drafting Williams as competition for Bryant is a luxury, and potentially a brilliant pick, but I never felt it was an obvious need. Basically, before the draft everyone assumed that Williams was a top 50 lock and I didn't think Seattle would take a pure specialist like him anywhere close to that early. But in the 5th round? Hell yeah. It's just that no one on the outside could anticipate he'd last that long.

    And Harper I hadn't heard any connection to Seattle at all. That was the most shocking pick of the draft for me.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 16083
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • kearly wrote:
    FlyingGreg wrote:It was interesting...I had read several pieces on the Hawks having legitimate interest in Michael, Harper and Williams


    Seriously?

    I wish I had seen those articles before the draft. I knew about Michael but Williams never made sense for Seattle's 3-tech, which was proven when they took Hill over Williams in the 3rd round. Drafting Williams as competition for Bryant is a luxury, and potentially a brilliant pick, but I never felt it was an obvious need. Basically, before the draft everyone assumed that Williams was a top 50 lock and I didn't think Seattle would take a pure specialist like him anywhere close to that early. But in the 5th round? Hell yeah. It's just that no one on the outside could anticipate he'd last that long.

    And Harper I hadn't heard any connection to Seattle at all. That was the most shocking pick of the draft for me.


    Yep. Quite a few mocks had us selecting Williams.

    Don Banks: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/-nfl-d ... z2RbWdact7

    Heck, even English picked it: http://seahawksdraftblog.com/day-two-preview

    And a buddy of mine clued me in to the interest in Harper. Not sure where he was getting that from.

    Williams and Harper both made sense to me. And that's just the catch with this draft, there wasn't an "obvious need". I thought they might take a shot on Williams, although I picked it in the 2nd round which was obviously way off.

    Harper was one of the WRs I thought they would target to fill the "big/physical" niche we were missing from the WR corps.
    Image]
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 8302
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: San Diego, CA


  • I had Harper as well.

    He and Jesse Williams were the only Hawk picks that I screamed out, YES!!
    Superbowl XLVIII Champions..."Can't keep everyone."
    User avatar
    onanygivensunday
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3767
    Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am


  • I had Harper targeted in a couple of my initial mocks, was later thrown off by apparently incorrect Q. Patton interest, and Christine Michael in the last one. I think most people generally over ranked the OLB need, the positions they addressed other than the number of late o-linemen was a surprise. I figured they'd go RT early, they didn't, and maybe address FS and QB in 7th round, and they picked neither position.

    I think generally people thought the needs would be DT, OLB, WR, OT, CB, RB, TE, FS, QB .. and most of that group as backups or situational with the hopes of some being future starters, and that was mostly the direction they went, but skipped the QB and skipped someone behind Earl.
    User avatar
    TheWebHead
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 238
    Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 10:35 pm




It is currently Sat Sep 24, 2016 12:58 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: lobohawk and 11 guests