NBA returning to Seattle?

Discuss any and all sports-related topics. From the College Sports to Baseball and everything in between. RATING: PG-13
Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Tue May 07, 2013 6:44 pm
  • Thanks Throw and Pink. I was trying to find the post Hans Gruber removed. I gather there is a way to get this pm'd to me from reading that thread, if anyone happened to have the removed material?
    Image
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
    Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 9122
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Covington, Washington


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Tue May 07, 2013 6:50 pm
  • Hey, I'm GENUINELY thankful like a schoolgirl dancing with her crush. I so appreciate this.
    User avatar
    pehawk
    * Report Button *
     
    Posts: 9925
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Tue May 07, 2013 6:51 pm
  • drdiags wrote:Thanks Throw and Pink. I was trying to find the post Hans Gruber removed. I gather there is a way to get this pm'd to me from reading that thread, if anyone happened to have the removed material?

    What I had PM'd to me is posted on there, along with more from what I can tell.
    User avatar
    pinksheets
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2835
    Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm
    Location: Seattle


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Tue May 07, 2013 7:35 pm
  • Hans I hope you're not pulling our legs, my friend. First time since the recommendation came out that i'm actually feeling a shred of optimism. :179422:
    User avatar
    ErikG803
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 976
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:53 pm


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Tue May 07, 2013 7:38 pm
  • I haven't posted anything on FB and I don't think I have on here since the relocation committee denied the move. I've been withholding my thoughts until/if Hansen and Co. throw in the towel. I know these guys are working some magic behind the scenes. It's been too quiet on their front and KJ sounds like a man that's really worried.
    User avatar
    -The Glove-
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6936
    Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Tue May 07, 2013 7:47 pm
  • Throwdown wrote:
    pehawk wrote:Thanks you guys!


    Best Blitzer impression EVER!


    Huh? :229031_shrug:
    Image
    User avatar
    Blitzer88
    * NET Eeyore *
     
    Posts: 10902
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
    Location: Pasco, WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Tue May 07, 2013 8:25 pm
  • Blitzer88 wrote:
    Throwdown wrote:
    pehawk wrote:Thanks you guys!


    Best Blitzer impression EVER!


    Huh? :229031_shrug:

    To quote Kenneth Starr from the 90's "Your boy (Stern) is about to get rolled!"

    Enjoy the show Blitzer! :th2thumbs:
    42-13, 29-3, and 23-17 and a Lombardi trophy from THIS millennium.....deal with it niner trolls

    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!
    User avatar
    Sports Hernia
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 11046
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
    Location: Lombardi Land


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Tue May 07, 2013 9:58 pm
  • Well Hans I hope we didn't prematurely derail anything, but thanks. If the Sac group is still searching for money they obviously have over reached as well. I hope this news breaks soon. we all want to see KJ and company eating that big dish of crow with Stern having to carve up the carcass.
    Image

    To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
    Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
    .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , Idiot, member of the 38 club.
    User avatar
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 9968
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 5:19 am
  • Hans is Traumahawk.
    User avatar
    CALIHAWK1
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 9177
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 7:44 am
  • Two pages w/out Sacramento posters... Are they pulling a Blitzer? Come in off of the ledge, boys.

    Seriously though, kills me that we won't know anything until the 15th regardless of this news reported by Hans. The fact that Hansen's been so quiet in all of this doesn't give me the impression that he's desperate by any means (contrary to consensus among Sac fans).
    RockHawk wrote:This has turned into nothing but a personal attack, which goes against our forum rules...... I'll allow it.
    User avatar
    Laloosh
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3745
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:46 pm
    Location: WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 8:25 am
  • Seattle SuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuperSonics!

    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2230
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 10:14 am
  • E.C. Laloosh wrote:Two pages w/out Sacramento posters... Are they pulling a Blitzer? Come in off of the ledge, boys.


    Don't you have some salmon to smoke or something, hide the salmon, or whatever you do with salmon up there. I've been busy and tired of comments like "come in off the ledge" when Sacramento is clearly in the drivers seat right now.
    User avatar
    salamander
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 151
    Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:29 pm


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 10:24 am
  • salamander wrote:
    E.C. Laloosh wrote:Two pages w/out Sacramento posters... Are they pulling a Blitzer? Come in off of the ledge, boys.


    Don't you have some salmon to smoke or something, hide the salmon, or whatever you do with salmon up there. I've been busy and tired of comments like "come in off the ledge" when Sacramento is clearly in the drivers seat right now.


    Salmon's delicious. I love chowing down on a piece of smoked salmon while drinking a cup of joe and listening to old school grunge music.
    User avatar
    -The Glove-
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6936
    Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 10:27 am
  • salamander wrote:
    E.C. Laloosh wrote:Two pages w/out Sacramento posters... Are they pulling a Blitzer? Come in off of the ledge, boys.


    Don't you have some salmon to smoke or something, hide the salmon, or whatever you do with salmon up there. I've been busy and tired of comments like "come in off the ledge" when Sacramento is clearly in the drivers seat right now.


    Zing....

    Stop taking things so personally.
    Image
    User avatar
    AbsolutNET
    * NET X's & O's Guru *
     
    Posts: 8691
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
    Location: PNW


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 10:28 am
  • A guy who thinks running down salmon is proper smack is a man/boy who hasn't had well prepared seafood before. And for that, he has my pity.
    User avatar
    seahawk2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1608
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 10:28 am
  • To be in the driver's seat, I'd think your city would have to have an ownership group with a higher offer and a signed PSA, but I guess that's just logic talking.

    In Happy Funtime Fairy Land, I am sure Sacramento is in the driver's seat. In the real world, not so much.
    "He's a *****. It's not that he was a *****, he is a *****, and that's why he hasn't won anything."
    User avatar
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3601
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 10:52 am

Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 11:12 am
  • Still here (waves at Throw)
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 9822
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 11:15 am
  • This just in the Sacramento group just ask the NBA if they take EBT and if not can they make payments under the table!
    :th2thumbs:
    RealDeal
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 94
    Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:22 pm
    Location: Seattle, WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 11:38 am
  • salamander wrote:
    E.C. Laloosh wrote:Two pages w/out Sacramento posters... Are they pulling a Blitzer? Come in off of the ledge, boys.


    Don't you have some salmon to smoke or something, hide the salmon, or whatever you do with salmon up there. I've been busy and tired of comments like "come in off the ledge" when Sacramento is clearly in the drivers seat right now.


    Sacramento is in the driver's seat? How do you figure?

    At this point, all the NBA can do is loudly proclaim that they will refuse to allow the team to be relocated.

    What the NBA can not legally do:
    1) Force the Maloofs to sell to anyone, much less the Sacramento group
    2) Refuse to allow the Maloofs to sell (barring a clear conflict of interest)
    3) Set any artificial barriers on any sales agreement or artifically manipulate the valuation of a member franchise

    What you Sacramento folks don't seem to get is that a sales agreement between the Maloofs and the Hansen group has already been signed, sealed and delivered. Funds have already been deposited to escrow. To both the seller (Maloofs) and the purchaser (Hansen/Ballmer group), an agreement has already been reached reflecting the true market value of the franchise.

    After this sale was negotiated and the deal closed, the NBA interfered on behalf of a secondary group of buyers (whom I will refer to as the Sacramento Group). The NBA negotiated the terms of an agreement outside of the existing transaction and without the consent or knowledge of the Maloofs (seller). The value of this deal is actually lower than the existing negotiated sale.

    At this point, the NBA is blindly hoping that the Hansen/Ballmer group will walk away from their existing purchase agreement, surrendering the deposit and releasing any interest in the Kings. That is the reason the NBA voted first to prohibit the relocation of the Kings franchise. That is their ace and they have played it. The NBA hopes that if the Ballmer group realizes they won't be able to move the Kings, then they will just drop the sale.

    However, the NBA can not legally interfere with the actual sale without clearly violating the Sherman Act. The problem for the NBA is that their negotation with a third potential buyer (Sacramento Group) is just smoke and mirrors. It has no legal teeth and means nothing other than, "Hey, if we refuse to let you sell to Hansen, then there's this other deal over here waiting for you."

    Unless the NBA can prove in court that the existing Hansen/Ballmer offer represents a natural conflict of interest for the NBA, they have no legal justification to reject the sale. Doing so would artificially manipulate the market for the member franchise, to the detriment of both the seller and purchaser as agreed on the "fair market", and would be in violation of the Sherman Act. There is specific language in the Sherman Act that prevents the price fixing of franchises. If the NBA steps in and interferes with the sale, forcing the seller to accept a lower offer, this would be a textbook case of market manipulation as prohibited by the Sherman Act. And there are currently a cadre of very successful, very intelligent attorneys preparing for this argument right now. It should upset you Sacramento fans to learn that the Maloofs are rumored to be on this side of the fight.

    All the Sacramento Group can hope for at this point is that the Maloofs will tire of the fight and sign a deal that is unfavorable to them. The moment they accept that deal, then the Hansen/Ballmer group would have a much tougher fight in court. At that point, the Maloofs could argue that the deal they accepted was set by the market and whatever terms were included made it an equal offer.

    However, that has not happened, and many sources close to the fight (including the Maloofs) are publicly saying that it won't happen.

    If the NBA can't sweet-talk the Maloofs into selling to the Sacramento Group, then the Hansen/Ballmer group will continue their purchase of the Kings and the fight will continue. Again, the NBA is fully aware they can not stop the purchase because they can not prove any actual conflict of interest. Again, many sources close to the deal (including Hansen himself) are stating that the Hansen group has gone quiet because he fully intends to purchase the Kings and move forward. That is hardly a win for Sacramento.

    Once Hansen purchases the Kings, anything can happen. But if you're foolish enough to believe that Sacramento is in the driver seat, then you must not be paying attention. The Maloofs have already stated that they will not accept the Sacramento offer, and that in fact, no offer from Sacramento will ever be possible.

    But please, do keep entertaining me with your hope. It's almost cute in a sad kind of way.
    User avatar
    HansGruber
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1979
    Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:39 pm


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 11:51 am
  • Wow well said. I love it.
    RealDeal
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 94
    Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:22 pm
    Location: Seattle, WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 12:04 pm
  • Damn.....

    I haven't seen anyone get pimped slapped like that around here in a long time.

    salamander, unless you know John McClane you might want to bow out gracefully.
    As a musician and audio quality champion, Neil Young said in 2012, “Steve Jobs was a pioneer of digital music. But when he went home, he listened to vinyl.”
    User avatar
    twisted_steel2
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5289
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 9:41 am
    Location: Ballard


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 12:10 pm
  • twisted_steel2 wrote:Damn.....

    I haven't seen anyone get pimped slapped like that around here in a long time.

    salamander, unless you know John McClane you might want to bow out gracefully.


    +1

    Great post, Hans.
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2230
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 12:14 pm
  • There was no pimp slapping
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 9822
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 12:21 pm
  • SacHawk2.0 wrote:There was no pimp slapping


    There will if you don't give me my money by the end of the day.
    Image
    3elieve
    User avatar
    Throwdown
    * NET Baller *
     
    Posts: 19012
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
    Location: Graham, WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 12:29 pm
  • Image
    I'm sick of chasing after my dreams. I'm just going to find out where they're headed, and catch up with them later.
    - Mitch Hedberg
    User avatar
    vedthree
    * NET Sage *
     
    Posts: 820
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 5:04 pm
    Location: Bremerton


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 12:41 pm
  • sweet... so we have a basketball team? (honestly, i'm lost as hell in all this. quick summary?)
    User avatar
    Uncle Si
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4737
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 12:56 pm
  • HansGruber wrote:
    salamander wrote:
    E.C. Laloosh wrote:Two pages w/out Sacramento posters... Are they pulling a Blitzer? Come in off of the ledge, boys.


    Don't you have some salmon to smoke or something, hide the salmon, or whatever you do with salmon up there. I've been busy and tired of comments like "come in off the ledge" when Sacramento is clearly in the drivers seat right now.


    Sacramento is in the driver's seat? How do you figure?

    At this point, all the NBA can do is loudly proclaim that they will refuse to allow the team to be relocated.

    What the NBA can not legally do:
    1) Force the Maloofs to sell to anyone, much less the Sacramento group
    2) Refuse to allow the Maloofs to sell (barring a clear conflict of interest)
    3) Set any artificial barriers on any sales agreement or artifically manipulate the valuation of a member franchise

    What you Sacramento folks don't seem to get is that a sales agreement between the Maloofs and the Hansen group has already been signed, sealed and delivered. Funds have already been deposited to escrow. To both the seller (Maloofs) and the purchaser (Hansen/Ballmer group), an agreement has already been reached reflecting the true market value of the franchise.

    After this sale was negotiated and the deal closed, the NBA interfered on behalf of a secondary group of buyers (whom I will refer to as the Sacramento Group). The NBA negotiated the terms of an agreement outside of the existing transaction and without the consent or knowledge of the Maloofs (seller). The value of this deal is actually lower than the existing negotiated sale.

    At this point, the NBA is blindly hoping that the Hansen/Ballmer group will walk away from their existing purchase agreement, surrendering the deposit and releasing any interest in the Kings. That is the reason the NBA voted first to prohibit the relocation of the Kings franchise. That is their ace and they have played it. The NBA hopes that if the Ballmer group realizes they won't be able to move the Kings, then they will just drop the sale.

    However, the NBA can not legally interfere with the actual sale without clearly violating the Sherman Act. The problem for the NBA is that their negotation with a third potential buyer (Sacramento Group) is just smoke and mirrors. It has no legal teeth and means nothing other than, "Hey, if we refuse to let you sell to Hansen, then there's this other deal over here waiting for you."

    Unless the NBA can prove in court that the existing Hansen/Ballmer offer represents a natural conflict of interest for the NBA, they have no legal justification to reject the sale. Doing so would artificially manipulate the market for the member franchise, to the detriment of both the seller and purchaser as agreed on the "fair market", and would be in violation of the Sherman Act. There is specific language in the Sherman Act that prevents the price fixing of franchises. If the NBA steps in and interferes with the sale, forcing the seller to accept a lower offer, this would be a textbook case of market manipulation as prohibited by the Sherman Act. And there are currently a cadre of very successful, very intelligent attorneys preparing for this argument right now. It should upset you Sacramento fans to learn that the Maloofs are rumored to be on this side of the fight.

    All the Sacramento Group can hope for at this point is that the Maloofs will tire of the fight and sign a deal that is unfavorable to them. The moment they accept that deal, then the Hansen/Ballmer group would have a much tougher fight in court. At that point, the Maloofs could argue that the deal they accepted was set by the market and whatever terms were included made it an equal offer.

    However, that has not happened, and many sources close to the fight (including the Maloofs) are publicly saying that it won't happen.

    If the NBA can't sweet-talk the Maloofs into selling to the Sacramento Group, then the Hansen/Ballmer group will continue their purchase of the Kings and the fight will continue. Again, the NBA is fully aware they can not stop the purchase because they can not prove any actual conflict of interest. Again, many sources close to the deal (including Hansen himself) are stating that the Hansen group has gone quiet because he fully intends to purchase the Kings and move forward. That is hardly a win for Sacramento.

    Once Hansen purchases the Kings, anything can happen. But if you're foolish enough to believe that Sacramento is in the driver seat, then you must not be paying attention. The Maloofs have already stated that they will not accept the Sacramento offer, and that in fact, no offer from Sacramento will ever be possible.

    But please, do keep entertaining me with your hope. It's almost cute in a sad kind of way.

    Exactly what I was going to say
    User avatar
    -The Glove-
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6936
    Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 1:09 pm
  • "When they touch down, we'll blow the roof, they'll spend a month sifting through rubble, and by the time they figure out what went wrong, we'll be sitting on a beach, earning twenty percent. "
    User avatar
    seahawk2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1608
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 1:13 pm
  • Sacramento's drivers seat
    Image
    Image
    User avatar
    dunceface
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3265
    Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 1:53 pm
  • You know you're in trouble when you have to resort to legal arguments and potential lawsuits as your argument for why you are in the driver's seat. The NBA wants the Kings in Sacramento. Do you really think you will beat the NBA? And even if you did win through the courts, embarrassing the NBA wouldn't be a good start for your franchise.

    Oh, and your salmon is damn good. I was being serious when I said you should go make more of it instead of wasting your time here.
    User avatar
    salamander
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 151
    Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 1:29 pm


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 1:59 pm
  • salamander wrote:You know you're in trouble when you have to resort to legal arguments and potential lawsuits as your argument for why you are in the driver's seat. The NBA wants the Kings in Sacramento. Do you really think you will beat the NBA? And even if you did win through the courts, embarrassing the NBA wouldn't be a good start for your franchise.

    Oh, and your salmon is damn good. I was being serious when I said you should go make more of it instead of wasting your time here.


    The NBA doesn't have a choice but to accept the sale to Hansen

    Also the NBA embarrassed itself years ago, especially when they moved Vancouver to Memphis and uprooted a great franchise in the Sonics to go to a severly worse market in OKC

    Stern is the embarrassment and putting his ass on the spot in court and destroying him in every way is every Sonics fan delight
    User avatar
    Shaz
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 374
    Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:40 am
    Location: Tacoma, WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 2:01 pm
  • salamander wrote:You know you're in trouble when you have to resort to legal arguments and potential lawsuits as your argument for why you are in the driver's seat. The NBA wants the Kings in Sacramento. Do you really think you will beat the NBA? And even if you did win through the courts, embarrassing the NBA wouldn't be a good start for your franchise.

    Oh, and your salmon is damn good. I was being serious when I said you should go make more of it instead of wasting your time here.


    Yeah, legal arguments are pretty pathetic... until you have to watch the guy w/ the legal argument walk away with a smile on his face, whistling and twirling keys to the moving truck for his fancy new NBA basketball franchise.
    RockHawk wrote:This has turned into nothing but a personal attack, which goes against our forum rules...... I'll allow it.
    User avatar
    Laloosh
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3745
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:46 pm
    Location: WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 2:06 pm
  • KJ's next move:
    Image
    Image
    User avatar
    dunceface
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3265
    Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 2:18 pm
  • Salamander, you are showing your ass again. We are the one city that has sued the NBA and won.

    And yeah, isn't it unfortunate that we have to resort to, you know, the law, in this situation? The NBA doesn't have dominion over the courts my friend.
    User avatar
    seahawk2k
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1608
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:41 pm


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 2:24 pm
  • salamander wrote:You know you're in trouble when you have to resort to legal arguments and potential lawsuits as your argument for why you are in the driver's seat. The NBA wants the Kings in Sacramento. Do you really think you will beat the NBA? And even if you did win through the courts, embarrassing the NBA wouldn't be a good start for your franchise.

    Oh, and your salmon is damn good. I was being serious when I said you should go make more of it instead of wasting your time here.

    You're right. Sacramento is in the driver's seat.

    Image
    User avatar
    -The Glove-
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 6936
    Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 2:29 pm
  • -The Glove- wrote:
    salamander wrote:You know you're in trouble when you have to resort to legal arguments and potential lawsuits as your argument for why you are in the driver's seat. The NBA wants the Kings in Sacramento. Do you really think you will beat the NBA? And even if you did win through the courts, embarrassing the NBA wouldn't be a good start for your franchise.

    Oh, and your salmon is damn good. I was being serious when I said you should go make more of it instead of wasting your time here.

    You're right. Sacramento is in the driver's seat.

    Image


    The correct image would have the driver holding Stern's hand, who is walking him in the direction he's supposed to drive.
    User avatar
    The Outfield
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2230
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 3:17 pm
  • I'd seriously love to see the post-apocalyptic re-make of this if H/B/N succeed...

    RockHawk wrote:This has turned into nothing but a personal attack, which goes against our forum rules...... I'll allow it.
    User avatar
    Laloosh
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3745
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:46 pm
    Location: WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 3:27 pm
  • Throwdown wrote:
    SacHawk2.0 wrote:There was no pimp slapping


    There will if you don't give me my money by the end of the day.

    Yeah me too, bitch. Give me my money!
    VEGAS HAS A SUPERBOWL REMATCH--DENVER WINNING
    http://cover32.com/seahawks/2014/08/06/ ... the-cards/
    Follow me on Twitter: @George_OGorman
    User avatar
    Lords of Scythia
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1316
    Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 3:34 pm
  • salamander wrote:You know you're in trouble when you have to resort to legal arguments and potential lawsuits as your argument for why you are in the driver's seat. The NBA wants the Kings in Sacramento. Do you really think you will beat the NBA? And even if you did win through the courts, embarrassing the NBA wouldn't be a good start for your franchise.

    Oh, and your salmon is damn good. I was being serious when I said you should go make more of it instead of wasting your time here.



    I'd rather have an ownership group that is threatening to sue if the NBA tries to block an existing sales agreement with a seller who has openly stated he wants to sell to me, than an ownership group waving around an inferior offer they pulled out of thin air while the seller openly says he wants nothing to do with you.

    News flash: It doesn't matter what the NBA wants. What does the NBA have to do with the sale of that team? NOTHING. They have zero power over who buys or sells that team other than voting on a conflict of interest.

    What matters is what the Maloofs want. They're the ones who ultimately decide who does or doesn't buy the Kings. The NBA knows that, which is why they're trying to block a relocation now, before the sale goes through. It's the only thing the NBA can legally do to try to block a sale. They're hoping two billionaires will tuck tail and run. Generally, that is not how billionaires become billionaires, but you know... that's really all they've got in the quiver.

    Being in the driver's seat means you are setting the tone, you are the one in control.

    Right now, it is Hansen who is in control. Hansen is the one with a binding sale agreement, in writing, signed by the seller, with payment made in full. All Hansen has to do is kick back and follow through with the purchase. Let the NBA fight it and hang themselves with their own rope.

    Sacramento is the third wheel, waving an inferior offer at the media as if that means anything to anyone. Apparently, nobody has bothered to explain to them that without the Maloofs signatures, it means less than the paper it's written on.

    The seller (Maloofs) just told your newspaper there was no way they would ever accept an offer from Sacramento and that an arena deal in Sacramento was impossible. Only the NBA is interested in your arena plan, but you need more than that, you need the owner of the Kings to accept it. And both owners (current and upcoming) have both stated they have no interest in the Sacramento arena plan. How is that being in the driver's seat? I must be missing something.

    Literally the only thing the NBA can do for Sacramento is force Hansen to stay in the current arena. Meanwhile, Hansen can just sit on the team, force them to play in the existing arena, and wait it out. He can do exactly what Clay Bennett did here if he wanted to be a dick about it. Just trade away the good players, and let them lose. Stop maintaining the arena, and wait it out. Eventually, the NBA will capitulate and let Hansen move wherever he wants because ultimately, what is best for the NBA is to have owners investing in a watchable product, playing in arenas that will generate revenue for the NBA.

    Eventually, the NBA will stop caring about how the arena is financed. They'll feel the pain in their wallet and Hansen will have his way. Literally the only people who feel pain over all this mess will be Sacramento. Do I think that's fair? Nope. But that's the fight the NBA has chosen.

    So while you claim to be in the driver's seat, I'd see it more as being stuck in the electric chair while the governor and warden fight over when to pull the switch.
    User avatar
    HansGruber
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1979
    Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:39 pm


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 3:49 pm
  • Lords of Scythia wrote:
    Throwdown wrote:
    There will if you don't give me my money by the end of the day.

    Yeah me too, bitch. Give me my money!


    The both of you can kiss my scrote.
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 9822
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 4:04 pm
  • So, Mr. Gruber, should I still be happy or what? I have been positive throughout this whole thing. I should still be positive, right?

    I don't need any details, just a "Yes, you should feel great" or "No, things are worse, we're losing him, doctor!"
    "He's a *****. It's not that he was a *****, he is a *****, and that's why he hasn't won anything."
    User avatar
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3601
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 4:07 pm
  • Smelly McUgly wrote:So, Mr. Gruber, should I still be happy or what? I have been positive throughout this whole thing. I should still be positive, right?

    I don't need any details, just a "Yes, you should feel great" or "No, things are worse, we're losing him, doctor!"


    HansGruber wrote:I've been asked to stop sharing specifics but I just heard some news that should make Sonics fans thrilled.

    Just know this:
    The Ballmer Hansen team is for real, they have Stern in a corner right now, there is no legal way to deny the Hansen sale, and as we speak, plans are being put into effect.

    The irony of all this is that I hate the NBA, have never really cared about the Sonics, yet for the first time in my life, I got to hear some breaking news that few are privy to. Always wished I could get a secret Seahawks scoop but never got one. I'm a nobody. But sitting here right now bouncing in my seat, excited for you Sonics fans, and wish I could share. Keep the faith. Shit is about to get real.
    RockHawk wrote:This has turned into nothing but a personal attack, which goes against our forum rules...... I'll allow it.
    User avatar
    Laloosh
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3745
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:46 pm
    Location: WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 4:13 pm
  • HansGruber wrote:
    salamander wrote:You know you're in trouble when you have to resort to legal arguments and potential lawsuits as your argument for why you are in the driver's seat. The NBA wants the Kings in Sacramento. Do you really think you will beat the NBA? And even if you did win through the courts, embarrassing the NBA wouldn't be a good start for your franchise.

    Oh, and your salmon is damn good. I was being serious when I said you should go make more of it instead of wasting your time here.



    I'd rather have an ownership group that is threatening to sue if the NBA tries to block an existing sales agreement with a seller who has openly stated he wants to sell to me, than an ownership group waving around an inferior offer they pulled out of thin air while the seller openly says he wants nothing to do with you.

    News flash: It doesn't matter what the NBA wants. What does the NBA have to do with the sale of that team? NOTHING. They have zero power over who buys or sells that team other than voting on a conflict of interest.

    What matters is what the Maloofs want. They're the ones who ultimately decide who does or doesn't buy the Kings. The NBA knows that, which is why they're trying to block a relocation now, before the sale goes through. It's the only thing the NBA can legally do to try to block a sale. They're hoping two billionaires will tuck tail and run. Generally, that is not how billionaires become billionaires, but you know... that's really all they've got in the quiver.

    Being in the driver's seat means you are setting the tone, you are the one in control.

    Right now, it is Hansen who is in control. Hansen is the one with a binding sale agreement, in writing, signed by the seller, with payment made in full. All Hansen has to do is kick back and follow through with the purchase. Let the NBA fight it and hang themselves with their own rope.

    Sacramento is the third wheel, waving an inferior offer at the media as if that means anything to anyone. Apparently, nobody has bothered to explain to them that without the Maloofs signatures, it means less than the paper it's written on.

    The seller (Maloofs) just told your newspaper there was no way they would ever accept an offer from Sacramento and that an arena deal in Sacramento was impossible. Only the NBA is interested in your arena plan, but you need more than that, you need the owner of the Kings to accept it. And both owners (current and upcoming) have both stated they have no interest in the Sacramento arena plan. How is that being in the driver's seat? I must be missing something.

    Literally the only thing the NBA can do for Sacramento is force Hansen to stay in the current arena. Meanwhile, Hansen can just sit on the team, force them to play in the existing arena, and wait it out. He can do exactly what Clay Bennett did here if he wanted to be a dick about it. Just trade away the good players, and let them lose. Stop maintaining the arena, and wait it out. Eventually, the NBA will capitulate and let Hansen move wherever he wants because ultimately, what is best for the NBA is to have owners investing in a watchable product, playing in arenas that will generate revenue for the NBA.

    Eventually, the NBA will stop caring about how the arena is financed. They'll feel the pain in their wallet and Hansen will have his way. Literally the only people who feel pain over all this mess will be Sacramento. Do I think that's fair? Nope. But that's the fight the NBA has chosen.

    So while you claim to be in the driver's seat, I'd see it more as being stuck in the electric chair while the governor and warden fight over when to pull the switch.



    you are too for too Sir. let me know if you need some baby powder for that hand because you are pimp slap in the crap out of them.
    RealDeal
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 94
    Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:22 pm
    Location: Seattle, WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 4:15 pm
  • E.C. Laloosh wrote:
    Smelly McUgly wrote:So, Mr. Gruber, should I still be happy or what? I have been positive throughout this whole thing. I should still be positive, right?

    I don't need any details, just a "Yes, you should feel great" or "No, things are worse, we're losing him, doctor!"


    HansGruber wrote:I've been asked to stop sharing specifics but I just heard some news that should make Sonics fans thrilled.

    Just know this:
    The Ballmer Hansen team is for real, they have Stern in a corner right now, there is no legal way to deny the Hansen sale, and as we speak, plans are being put into effect.

    The irony of all this is that I hate the NBA, have never really cared about the Sonics, yet for the first time in my life, I got to hear some breaking news that few are privy to. Always wished I could get a secret Seahawks scoop but never got one. I'm a nobody. But sitting here right now bouncing in my seat, excited for you Sonics fans, and wish I could share. Keep the faith. Shit is about to get real.


    Yeah, but now we're getting stuff like this:

    Brock Huard ‏@BrockESPN 10s

    NBA will find path to not destroy relationship w/Ballmer & make Hansen whole“@_MParker: @BrockESPN What’s your gut feeling on what it means?
    "He's a *****. It's not that he was a *****, he is a *****, and that's why he hasn't won anything."
    User avatar
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3601
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 4:18 pm
  • Brock Huard ‏@BrockESPN
    Two thoughts I am hearing out of NY:

    1. Disappointment

    2. Clear Path

    What those mean, your guess is as good as mine over the next 7 days


    Brock Huard ‏@BrockESPN
    I will only report what I know, and earlier tweet is from NY. Work & negotiation ongoing. What "clear path" means is TBD.


    Brock Huard ‏@BrockESPN
    NBA will find path to not destroy relationship w/Ballmer & make Hansen whole“@_MParker: @BrockESPN What's your gut feeling on what it means?


    So David Stern is going to pay Hansen $30,000,000.00 and then give Ballmer a blowjob?

    Edit: first crack at that one didn't read the way I heard it in my head :34853_doh:
    RockHawk wrote:This has turned into nothing but a personal attack, which goes against our forum rules...... I'll allow it.
    User avatar
    Laloosh
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3745
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:46 pm
    Location: WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 4:33 pm
  • SacHawk2.0 wrote:
    Lords of Scythia wrote:
    Throwdown wrote:
    There will if you don't give me my money by the end of the day.

    Yeah me too, bitch. Give me my money!


    The both of you can kiss my scrote.

    Yeah that's fine - whatever. NOW BITCH GIVE ME MY MONEY.
    VEGAS HAS A SUPERBOWL REMATCH--DENVER WINNING
    http://cover32.com/seahawks/2014/08/06/ ... the-cards/
    Follow me on Twitter: @George_OGorman
    User avatar
    Lords of Scythia
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1316
    Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am


NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 4:39 pm
  • One of the things I don't understand is how can the NBA stop the team from being sold and then moved. Remember when the Seahawks were headed to LA? They even had practices down there. The Oakland Raiders did move to LA. A suit was filed based on eminent Domain and was lost. The NFL had to pay Davis millions.

    What is the difference ?
    User avatar
    Happypuppy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1859
    Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 4:42 pm
  • The kings will be in settle next season. They are just trying to get our group to back out and they wont.
    RealDeal
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 94
    Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 1:22 pm
    Location: Seattle, WA


Re: NBA returning to Seattle?
Wed May 08, 2013 4:57 pm
  • RealDeal wrote:The kings will be in settle next season.


    Yeah, to play the Sonics...oh wait...
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 9822
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


PreviousNext


It is currently Wed Aug 20, 2014 4:54 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE SPORTS BAR ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests