Any veteran free agents you'd still like to see Seattle add?

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
  • Now that the draft is over, you can usually find some pretty cheap veterans to add to any holes that might be on the roster. There are a few guys who I wouldnt mind taking a look at:

    I'd like to see the Seahawks sign one of: Tyson Clabo, Bryant McKinney or Eric Winston to provide depth at tackle. Could be this years Frank Omiyale, only better.

    Also wouldnt mind us picking up a veteran linebacker. Not to be a starter, but just to be part of the group and part of the rotation. I'd prefer Carlos Dansby, but wouldnt mind Brian Urlacher either.

    Keep in mind, i'm talking relatively low salaries for backup players here, i'm not talking big time free agents who we're going to rely on to contribute a ton.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18511
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


  • Urlacher would be awesome in a mentoring type role and insurance, but even at his advanced age, I don't see him taking minimal salary. ...but he does have connections to WA
    "I don't know what you're talking about." GT
    User avatar
    TriCHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1339
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:52 pm
    Location: Tri-Cities, WA


  • Would love to sign Winston.

    Maybe John Abraham if he's cheap enough :mrgreen:
    User avatar
    ErikG803
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 976
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:53 pm


  • I would co-sign for Clabo.

    I wouldn't slit my wrists if we signed Gaither to a 1-year deal.
    User avatar
    SDHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 584
    Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:06 pm


  • Just as long as anyone we sign at this point understands he'll be battling it out with our current guys and may well be shown the door by August.
    February 2, 2014: The day Seahawks win their second Lombardi trophy
    (The first one is located back east somewhere.)
    User avatar
    Ruminator
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 285
    Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 6:52 pm


  • A WILL Veteran to challenge in camp and then we can cut them.
    Brahn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 642
    Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:06 am


  • Abraham and Freeney still on the market...they must realize know their asking price is crashing back to earth.
    @SeahawkGreg

    Image

    "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 7466
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: CVN-68


  • Michael Boley, LB, formerly with the Giants. http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/3341

    Some of the guys that JSeahawks mentioned would be great but I think McKinnie, Gaither, and Clabo may want big $$$. These are all former pro-bowlers so they wouldn't be cheap.
    User avatar
    hawkfan68
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3510
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • I wouldn't take any, because they cost more than rookies. Might as well keep the guys we've got and save the money.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2375
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


  • I'm not against another edge rusher like Abraham or Freeney. You can never have enough of those (just like running backs). Only at the vet minimum, though.
    "He's a *****. It's not that he was a *****, he is a *****, and that's why he hasn't won anything."
    User avatar
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3620
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


  • jlwaters1 wrote:I wouldn't take any, because they cost more than rookies. Might as well keep the guys we've got and save the money.


    It would most likely just be on a 1 year deal. So wouldnt matter going forward.
    Image
    User avatar
    JSeahawks
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 18511
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
    Location: Milwaukie, Oregon


  • the money is a non issue, but I'm more worried about 53 roster spots. We're going to lose some guys we like to waivers as it is. I would rather just go in with what we've got and sign some of these guys if they are still around during the season and we really need them. Maybe that's risky. I suppose we could use 1 more backup tackle. I think Giacomini might be pretty solid though, I don't think he wants to be the guy that gets all the penalties again and kills an otherwise hopeful season.
    Last edited by Hawknballs on Tue Apr 30, 2013 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    Image
    User avatar
    Hawknballs
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2658
    Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:51 am


  • JSeahawks wrote:
    jlwaters1 wrote:I wouldn't take any, because they cost more than rookies. Might as well keep the guys we've got and save the money.


    It would most likely just be on a 1 year deal. So wouldnt matter going forward.


    True, but I'd rather the young guys get a chance. Think about it this way. Last year PC and co. brought in TO and that other washed up WR. So instead of getting the younger player extra reps they had to split them with TO and the other WR (Bryant???) why do this to the younger guys?

    The only place I could see adding somewhere is at Tackle only. We have loads of guards to sift through, no need to add more. The Defense is set with vets/Rookies and as PC already said he likes what he has at Lber, so I wouldn't add anything there. I'd give these guys as much reps as possible and see who emerges.

    I'll always prefer rookies/ young players over older vets. It provides more intrigue.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2375
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


  • I think we could take a look a someone's "throw away" quarterback as the season/training camp get closer ??
    I'm not sold on the fact that Brady Quinn will be our #2 QB as we go into Carolina ??
    ....not sure of an example yet, (and not to hijack the thread) but maybe Mark Sanchez.....

    I guess that's an example :179419:
    "If You're Good At Making Excuses, You'll Never Be Great At Anything Else." ~ Richard Sherman

    GO HAWKS !!
    User avatar
    glowingeyedseahawk
    * PA's # 1 Seahawks Fan *
     
    Posts: 540
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 pm
    Location: Sinking Spring, PA


  • JSeahawks wrote:
    jlwaters1 wrote:I wouldn't take any, because they cost more than rookies. Might as well keep the guys we've got and save the money.


    It would most likely just be on a 1 year deal. So wouldnt matter going forward.


    It does matter. Signing a player on a 1 year, 2 million deal means we will have 2 million less in cap next year because of the cap rollover. We are going to need to roll a few million into next year.
    User avatar
    cacksman
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 568
    Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:17 am


  • Mckinnie will get paid to start this year.
    User avatar
    bmorepunk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 392
    Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:56 pm


  • To me the issue is if you have to cut someone that isn't as good as the veteran this year but would be better next year. If you have a fourth-sixth rounder that you now cut that could have a great 2014 then I rather see him hold down the roster spot even if he isn't as good right now.

    Fine line to walk but you have to be competitive now while building for the future...
    mikeak
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3213
    Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


  • glowingeyedseahawk wrote:I'm not sold on the fact that Brady Quinn will be our #2 QB


    Pretty sure that hasn't been announced....

    I expect Jerrod Johnson to put up a fight for that spot.
    mikeak
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3213
    Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
    Location: Anchorage, AK


  • Herschel Walker!
    Image
    "VICTORYYYYYYY!" -Johnny Drama
    User avatar
    RolandDeschain
    *NET FCC Liaison*
     
    Posts: 24799
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
    Location: Kirkland, WA


  • I would like to see another kicker at camp. Maybe we can get a guy capable of a 50+ yard FG with any kind of consistency.
    ______________________________

    Our secondary is gonna be like the Bermuda Triangle this year again boys! 2/3rds of the world is covered by water..... the rest is covered by the LOB!

    Made....Laid.....Paid!!!
    User avatar
    nwgamer
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 356
    Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:26 am
    Location: Cashmere, WA


  • I still think Richard Seymour would be interesting, that is if he's still out there.
    User avatar
    getnasty
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 884
    Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:22 pm


  • The Seahawks are no where near done! All of these very good FAs are finding out they will be working for pennies, and will want to at least win for that low of cash. The hawks can stock pile probowlers right now and should! We are overstocked on young talent, so much so that we know we can't keep all of it (they should trade them for picks before losing them to FA).
    One thing to think about is that these "very good" FAs will be "amazing" on the Hawks team. They will not have to carry the team like they use to. What is nice is that all we have are probowlers, so our players are doing thier job plus. This seems like a cake job for incoming FA! (If they make the team)

    Bring them all in! Upgrade! Compete! It seems to be working so far!

    I can see at least 2 OL 2 DL 1 LB 1 QB makeing the team that is not on right now.
    Spokane
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 700
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am


  • I want Dansby, I don't even care if it works. Just please me.
    User avatar
    Hawk Finn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1183
    Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:44 am


  • Are there any good safeties available to back up Thomas? I don't trust Maragos if ET gets hurt.
    User avatar
    chevelle03
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 144
    Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 3:10 pm
    Location: Scotland


  • definitely o-line depth..
    User avatar
    jack_patera
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 208
    Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 2:37 pm
    Location: ..Location..Location


  • Technically, not a UFA. This would require a trade:

    Jabaal Sheard

    I mentioned him a couple months back on SDB, and I think now more than ever, his availability has to be presumed and not suspected.

    Cleveland moved from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Sheard is a quick 260 lb 4-3 end. They had hoped to move him to OLB when the new staff arrived.

    2 months later the browns pulled the trigger on Barkevious Mingo at #6 overall. Basically, it's Sheard or Mingo at this point, since the other OLB is pretty set. If you're Cleveland, you don't make that pick on an OLB unless you have a sizable man crush. Because there were plenty of prospects available there where Cleveland could have traded out and taken a different OLB or fill another need.

    Cleveland just sunk 11M/yr on their left OLB (Paul Kruger). So there are 3 OLBs and only 2 OLB spots.

    Sheard is a very productive player who possesses the size and speed to actually be a long term LEO. He's also right in that Schneider/Carroll 'love his age' zone as he'll be 24 this month. Not unlike Miller, Rice and Harvin -- he's right at that 24-25 years that they typically love to pick guys up.

    Sheard was a guy I'd hoped we would trade for instead of Avril. He's a guy who is well suited to succeed Clemons and to be productive for a good 4-6 years after that. Assuming Avril does end up playing SAM on passing downs a lot -- there isn't that much of a conflict between them.

    It could take a 2014 #2 to get him. Or Seattle could wait on him and maybe get him for a #4 and change. His availability is worth keeping an eye on as the offseason rolls on. IMO, he is a much superior version of Avril who doesn't completely compromise our run defense as Avril does.
    Attyla the Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 691
    Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 2:38 pm


  • mikeak wrote:To me the issue is if you have to cut someone that isn't as good as the veteran this year but would be better next year. If you have a fourth-sixth rounder that you now cut that could have a great 2014 then I rather see him hold down the roster spot even if he isn't as good right now.

    Fine line to walk but you have to be competitive now while building for the future...


    I'm with you. I'd rather go with the younger player if player a (rookie) is close in play to a vet. Obviously if there's a huge difference than go with the Vet. But if the difference between the two isn't significant than I'd keep the younger, cheaper player and expect him to develop and progress.
    jlwaters1
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2375
    Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm


  • Hawk Finn wrote:I want Dansby, I don't even care if it works. Just please me.

    I would love this move.
    SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
    User avatar
    Scottemojo
    *Scott of Smacksville*
    *Scott of Smacksville*
     
    Posts: 10779
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am


  • It wouldn't shock me if we went into the draft knowing Dansby would be available, and make a move when the price is right. Would also love this move.
    User avatar
    godawg
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 468
    Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:46 pm


  • Dangerous times for signing FAs, they can command more money then you think waiting around for TC/preseason injuries and the desperation that ensues.

    I wouldn't be shocked if barring a disaster, PC/JS are more then happy to stay away from anymore major FA signings.
    Last edited by Russell Wilson on Sun Sep 15, 2013 9:20 pm, edited 29-3 times in total.
    Last edited by NFC Champion Russell Wilson on Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:14 pm, edited 23-17 times in total.
    Last edited by World Champion Russell Wilson on Sun Feb 2, 2014 7:14 pm, edited 43-8 times in total.
    User avatar
    Lady Talon
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 757
    Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 3:55 am


  • I'm with Attyla on this. I'd love Jabaal Sheard. I think he can be had for relatively cheap since the Brownies are probably hyped about getting Mingo and might think getting anything for Sheard is a good thing at this point. Maybe try and use the pick we got for Flynn? Like Attyla said, he's got the perfect age/production combo that JS/PC are looking for when they go outside the organization. And not only is Sheard young and athletic and an ideal long-term replacement for Clem at the LEO, but he's got a non-stop motor on the field as well, which means he'll do the dirty work of a LEO and always pursuit the ball carrier on plays away from him. He'd probably rack up quite a few coverage sacks as well with this secondary behind him coupled with his relentless pursuit of the QB.

    If Sheard is too much of a pipe dream at this point, I'd love it if the Hawks took a look at Dansby. He's always been one of my favorite players ever since he played at Auburn so it'd be awesome to see him rockin Hawks duds at some point in his career. Plus, he's still a damn good football player and if he could be hard for an Antoine Winfield type deal, I'd go out on a limb and say that this is the greatest football team ever assembled. The question then becomes whether or not Dansby or Wright would be the WILL or SAM. That's a nice problem to have.
    Talkin Seahawks All Day, All Night @ my blog Seafense! http://seafense.blogspot.com/
    User avatar
    NYCoug
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1392
    Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 5:45 pm


  • I would find Urlacher interesting our linebackers are great, but young. If we were to pick up someone like him I think he could add to and expand the abilities of our young players. It isn't really an issue of need but enhancement.
    User avatar
    Kixkahn
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 806
    Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:04 pm


  • Clabo's the only one i would even remotely consider at this point.
    35!
    AHH-OOH!
    User avatar
    KK84
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 842
    Joined: Tue Aug 09, 2011 7:01 pm
    Location: Bensalem, PA


  • Urlacher. Been screaming for this for months. Moves Wagner to a spot best suited utilize his athleticism and length. Wagner is a good MLB, but I believe could be a game changer outside.
    "So between my friends and I we have been at every home game to date this year, and we have all been plotting the offensive plays called. " ------Anthony!
    User avatar
    Tical21
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1358
    Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:37 pm


  • KK, it looks like Clabo is going to Miami. Love your moniker.
    User avatar
    godawg
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 468
    Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:46 pm




It is currently Thu Aug 28, 2014 5:36 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information