jlwaters1 wrote:I wouldn't take any, because they cost more than rookies. Might as well keep the guys we've got and save the money.
It would most likely just be on a 1 year deal. So wouldnt matter going forward.
True, but I'd rather the young guys get a chance. Think about it this way. Last year PC and co. brought in TO and that other washed up WR. So instead of getting the younger player extra reps they had to split them with TO and the other WR (Bryant???) why do this to the younger guys?
The only place I could see adding somewhere is at Tackle only. We have loads of guards to sift through, no need to add more. The Defense is set with vets/Rookies and as PC already said he likes what he has at Lber, so I wouldn't add anything there. I'd give these guys as much reps as possible and see who emerges.
I'll always prefer rookies/ young players over older vets. It provides more intrigue.