Forgive me if this has already been hashed through. I'm relatively new to the process.
So, let's assume Flynn is a Raider. And let's assume that Seattle stays put at #56. If EJ Manual, Tyler Wilson, Matt Scott are there to be taken, as well as Robert Woods, Sylvester Williams, Margus Hunt, David Amerson, Menelik Watson, Kyle Long, ect.
Is it against some unwritten rule to draft a QB a full round ahead of your franchise QB?
The advantageous are obvious: cheaper, can be molded, will buy into competition, can build up as collateral.
So, for the 56th pick in the draft to have the most value, do you take Matt Scott?
So, let's assume Flynn is a Raider. And let's assume that Seattle stays put at #56. If EJ Manual, Tyler Wilson, Matt Scott are there to be taken, as well as Robert Woods, Sylvester Williams, Margus Hunt, David Amerson, Menelik Watson, Kyle Long, ect.
Is it against some unwritten rule to draft a QB a full round ahead of your franchise QB?
The advantageous are obvious: cheaper, can be molded, will buy into competition, can build up as collateral.
So, for the 56th pick in the draft to have the most value, do you take Matt Scott?