Will you be disappointed if we DON'T Draft DT in rd 2??

Lynch Mob

New member
Joined
Mar 7, 2013
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
i'd say draft the best player available they don't need to do anything at 56 now they can just draft who ever falls to us. I could also see them moving up to get a player if it was within reasonable striking distance ( picks or compensation wise) and it was someone they really liked but it will be cool to see what they end up doing n who they end up drafting after all the speculation on how JS/PC think.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
29,178
Reaction score
5,196
Location
Kent, WA
Nope. BPA all the way, man. If that happens to be a DT, fine, but whatever they pick is probably better than anything I could suggest. ;)
 

AnchoviesofTerror

New member
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
334
Reaction score
0
Location
LA
Ive learned to trust the FO. last year i didnt really recognize a single name we drafted and it turned out a pretty good class. ive recently adopted the jags as an afc team so i will save my draft knee jerk judgements for them
 

Hawk Finn

New member
Joined
Jul 11, 2009
Messages
1,368
Reaction score
0
sutz":ce1ji1ul said:
Nope. BPA all the way, man. If that happens to be a DT, fine, but whatever they pick is probably better than anything I could suggest. ;)

This is an accurate response. Best value on the board, please. Don't reach for a DT just because of a *perceived* need if there are better impact players available at other positions. In fact, I hope we don't draft DT at all, just so I can witness the ensuing meltdown.
 

Latest posts

Top