| Author |
Message |
|
hawksfansinceday1
|
Post subject: Re: NFL Network is clueless....lol Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:53 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am Posts: 6336 Location: Vancouver, WA
|
razgriz737 wrote: I dunno. I think if we had almost any other QB besides Russell last season, we'd all be screaming for OL. Remember how many times he was dancing around in the backfield evading sacks?...... Good point but also remember how many times he had time and had to dance around waiting and waiting for some WR, any WR to get open. The addition of Harvin will help that a LOT. And as for the OL, I agree with others here that the run blocking is better than the pass blocking and there is definitely room for improvement, especially at G. GO ZAGS!!
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: NFL Network is clueless....lol Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:25 pm |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am Posts: 7476 Location: Monroe, WA
|
|
There are needs, and then there are needs. OL? Sure, we'll probably draft at least one, maybe two since we have some extra picks left. We'll probably even bring in a couple of UDFAs to camp. But I tend to define needs based at least a little bit on where we draft and I don't expect us to spend second day draft picks on OL, at least not rd 2-3. So yeah, a need, but not the biggest need, which is where we would expect the higher picks we have left to be spent.
_________________ Talent can get you to the playoffs. It takes character to win when you get there.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: NFL Network is clueless....lol Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:27 pm |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 10359 Location: Portland, OR
|
CALIHAWK1 wrote: Sarlacc83 wrote: I'm actually willing to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume it was typo and they meant DL.
Haha, who am I kidding. Eastcoastmediabias! You know they are based in Los Angeles right? Just sayin. LA's got the disease now, too? Guess the analysts brought it with them. Damn.
_________________ My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: NFL Network is clueless....lol Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:32 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm Posts: 16456 Location: SoCal
|
CALIHAWK1 wrote: Sarlacc83 wrote: I'm actually willing to give them the benefit of the doubt and assume it was typo and they meant DL.
Haha, who am I kidding. Eastcoastmediabias! You know they are based in Los Angeles right? Just sayin. NFL.com is a stones throw from my house, and I actually peed on it during the shortened preseason. Back to the original topic I agree with Andrea on the needs she listed. However, I think we should look for a diamond in the rough OL every year.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Lieutenant Dan
|
Post subject: Re: NFL Network is clueless....lol Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:34 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 11:52 am Posts: 257 Location: Memphis (Displaced Seattleite)
|
hawksfansinceday1 wrote: razgriz737 wrote: I dunno. I think if we had almost any other QB besides Russell last season, we'd all be screaming for OL. Remember how many times he was dancing around in the backfield evading sacks?...... Good point but also remember how many times he had time and had to dance around waiting and waiting for some WR, any WR to get open. The addition of Harvin will help that a LOT. And as for the OL, I agree with others here that the run blocking is better than the pass blocking and there is definitely room for improvement, especially at G. As I recall, I was pretty impressed by how FEW holding penalties we had given how much time Wilson held the ball looking for a receiver and practically running sideline to sideline lol. Gotta give the O line some credit. I was a LT in school, and pass blocking for someone who's running around back there with the ball looking for a WR is tough. Hard to keep track of where he is at any given moment while focusing on your block.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: NFL Network is clueless....lol Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:37 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am Posts: 5712 Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
Largent80 wrote: NFL.com is a stones throw from my house, and I actually peed on it during the shortened preseason I KNEW that was you.
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: NFL Network is clueless....lol Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:07 pm |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am Posts: 7476 Location: Monroe, WA
|
Largent80 wrote: Back to the original topic I agree with Andrea on the needs she listed. However, I think we should look for a diamond in the rough OL every year. Which they've done so far IIRC. I expect one or two late round picks of OL, plus maybe some UDFA action. Our line is in decent shape, we have time to coach some guys up.
_________________ Talent can get you to the playoffs. It takes character to win when you get there.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: NFL Network is clueless....lol Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:10 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm Posts: 16456 Location: SoCal
|
FlyingGreg wrote: Largent80 wrote: NFL.com is a stones throw from my house, and I actually peed on it during the shortened preseason I KNEW that was you. You could say I was Pissed Off.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
seahawks3732
|
Post subject: Re: NFL Network is clueless....lol Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 2:29 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 9:12 am Posts: 88 Location: Green Brook, New Jersey
|
|
The right side of the line needs to be upgraded some way
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: CFraychineaud, gwinnUSAF77, HawksSoc, hidn, HommyHawk, HoustonHawk82, Jayburd14, Landhawk1, NorthwestSportsFan, piratehawk, sam1313, Seabean, Seahwkgal and 94 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |