A look at PCJS last year's draft day trades

Discuss your thoughts about anything draft related. Mocks, College and Pro. Knock yourselves out!!! RATING: PG-13
  • Take a look at the trades PCJS made during the draft last year.

    Jets receive:
    Second-round pick (No. 43):Stephen Hill

    Seahawks receive:
    Second-round pick (No. 47): Bobby Wagner
    Fifth-round pick (No. 154): Korey Toomer
    Seventh-round pick (No. 232): Greg Scruggs

    Eagles receive:
    First-round pick (No. 12): Fletcher Cox

    Seahawks receive:
    First-round pick (No. 15): Bruce Irvin
    Fourth-round pick (No. 114): Jaye Howard
    Sixth-round pick (No. 172): Jeremy Lane

    Traded down 3 spots in the 1st round for 2 additional players, and traded down 4 spots in the 2nd round for 2 additional players.

    I hear people worrying that SF has 14-15 draft picks this year and we only have 10. The takeaway from this is that if John Schneider really wants 14 picks, he can easily attain them by trading down a couple times.
    User avatar
    cacksman
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 576
    Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:17 am


  • Quantity of picks doesn't matter. It's what they do with the pick - who they draft, etc. that makes the difference. So far JS/PC have a pretty good record of make good choices with their picks. Getting players who make impact - Wagner, Turbin, Sherman, Wright, Chancellor, Irvin, etc.
    User avatar
    hawkfan68
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3799
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • Quantity of picks DOES matter. No one is going to be right all the time. Even P&J have missed on their picks. The more picks you have, the more opportunities you give yourself to upgrade the team.
    Richard Sherman doesn't just wanna get in your head, he wants to build a vacation home there.

    R. Sherman: "I don't want to be an island. I want to be a tourist attraction. You come, I take your money & you go."
    User avatar
    SalishHawkFan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4761
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:39 pm


  • hawkfan68 wrote:Quantity of picks doesn't matter. It's what they do with the pick - who they draft, etc. that makes the difference. So far JS/PC have a pretty good record of make good choices with their picks. Getting players who make impact - Wagner, Turbin, Sherman, Wright, Chancellor, Irvin, etc.

    You left out the biggest one of all. DangeRuss. Don't you hate brain farts? :lol:
    User avatar
    Seahwkgal
    * NET Hottie *
     
    Posts: 2508
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm


  • Seahwkgal wrote:
    hawkfan68 wrote:Quantity of picks doesn't matter. It's what they do with the pick - who they draft, etc. that makes the difference. So far JS/PC have a pretty good record of make good choices with their picks. Getting players who make impact - Wagner, Turbin, Sherman, Wright, Chancellor, Irvin, etc.

    You left out the biggest one of all. DangeRuss. Don't you hate brain farts? :lol:



    He didn't leave him out, because that was our original pick. He was comparing what we got and what the other team got when we did trade.
    User avatar
    Waterhawk1
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 260
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:40 am


  • Seahwkgal wrote:
    hawkfan68 wrote:Quantity of picks doesn't matter. It's what they do with the pick - who they draft, etc. that makes the difference. So far JS/PC have a pretty good record of make good choices with their picks. Getting players who make impact - Wagner, Turbin, Sherman, Wright, Chancellor, Irvin, etc.

    You left out the biggest one of all. DangeRuss. Don't you hate brain farts? :lol:

    Bwa Ha :16: :16: Was thinking the same thing.
    Almost no one else saw RW as a viable option,,Round Three for cripes sake?
    Last edited by scutterhawk on Fri Mar 08, 2013 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
    scutterhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3638
    Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm


  • SalishHawkFan wrote:Quantity of picks DOES matter. No one is going to be right all the time. Even P&J have missed on their picks. The more picks you have, the more opportunities you give yourself to upgrade the team.

    Truth.
    Hedging their bets increasing the odds that you are going to have more success, with more choices. :stirthepot:
    scutterhawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3638
    Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm


  • Waterhawk1 wrote:
    Seahwkgal wrote:
    hawkfan68 wrote:Quantity of picks doesn't matter. It's what they do with the pick - who they draft, etc. that makes the difference. So far JS/PC have a pretty good record of make good choices with their picks. Getting players who make impact - Wagner, Turbin, Sherman, Wright, Chancellor, Irvin, etc.

    You left out the biggest one of all. DangeRuss. Don't you hate brain farts? :lol:



    He didn't leave him out, because that was our original pick. He was comparing what we got and what the other team got when we did trade.

    What do Sherman, Wright and Chancellor have to do with last year's draft then? I did understand what the ORIGINAL POST was referring to regarding last year's draft. My response was in response to what I quoted. A response to the original post. :34853_doh:
    User avatar
    Seahwkgal
    * NET Hottie *
     
    Posts: 2508
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm


  • Seahwkgal wrote:
    hawkfan68 wrote:Quantity of picks doesn't matter. It's what they do with the pick - who they draft, etc. that makes the difference. So far JS/PC have a pretty good record of make good choices with their picks. Getting players who make impact - Wagner, Turbin, Sherman, Wright, Chancellor, Irvin, etc.

    You left out the biggest one of all. DangeRuss. Don't you hate brain farts? :lol:


    LOL! You're correct. I did leave out Wilson didn't I. Thanks for catching that :th2thumbs:
    User avatar
    hawkfan68
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3799
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • SalishHawkFan wrote:Quantity of picks DOES matter. No one is going to be right all the time. Even P&J have missed on their picks. The more picks you have, the more opportunities you give yourself to upgrade the team.


    My point is quantity doesn't always equate to quality. Yes, quantity gives more chances but you have just as much a chance of drafting a dud as you do an impact player.
    User avatar
    hawkfan68
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3799
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


  • SalishHawkFan wrote:Quantity of picks DOES matter. No one is going to be right all the time. Even P&J have missed on their picks. The more picks you have, the more opportunities you give yourself to upgrade the team.


    :D :D Now wipe the spit bubbles off your keyboard :mrgreen:
    "I cannot believe this............ I am stunned right now. This is now a rebuilding year for us. Our offense is crap now"

    Blitzer88 regarding trading Percy to the Jets
    User avatar
    HawKnPeppa
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2707
    Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm


  • Reality: it will be a stretch to see 4 of this years draft class even make the final roster.
    @SeahawkGreg

    Image

    "I will be thrilled with 10 wins.... If we win 14 games, I will tattoo my nuts green and blue!" --13thMan
    User avatar
    FlyingGreg
    * Master Chief *
    * Master Chief *
     
    Posts: 7534
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
    Location: CVN-68


  • FlyingGreg wrote:Reality: it will be a stretch to see 4 of this years draft class even make the final roster.


    I don't doubt it. That's why I can actually see us moving up in the draft this year.
    "Pete Carroll brings in great elves...and they make the best presents."
    User avatar
    SacHawk2.0
    .NOT a Moderator
     
    Posts: 10371
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
    Location: With a white girl


  • hawkfan68 wrote:Quantity of picks doesn't matter. It's what they do with the pick - who they draft, etc. that makes the difference. So far JS/PC have a pretty good record of make good choices with their picks. Getting players who make impact - Wagner, Turbin, Sherman, Wright, Chancellor, Irvin, etc.


    The more picks you have the more chances you have of being right.
    " Living on Earth isn't cheap, but it does include a yearly free trip around the sun."
    User avatar
    v1rotv2
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
    *TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3391
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:32 am
    Location: The Open Road


  • Without that second trade down we probably draft Mychal Kendricks instead of Bobby Wagner. Maybe Kendricks is really great for us, but it would be tough to top what Wagner did last year.
    User avatar
    kearly
    * Mr Random Thought *
     
    Posts: 11210
    Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am


  • Hard to complain about what the FO has done but I really would have liked to have Fletcher Cox :179422:
    User avatar
    ErikG803
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 978
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 2:53 pm


  • I like Irwin, but I'm also bummed we didn't get Cox.
    User avatar
    godawg
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 469
    Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:46 pm


  • godawg wrote:I like Irwin, but I'm also bummed we didn't get Cox.


    Got to believe if they were interested in Cox they probably don't move down. I'm guessing they knew who Philly were trading up for.

    Think the aim last year was always edge rusher. This year it's probably interior rusher.
    User avatar
    theENGLISHseahawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8061
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am




It is currently Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:23 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE NCAA FOOTBALL & PRO DRAFT FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest