QB Problem
- Thread starter Seahawks Freak
- Start date
kidhawk
Well-known member
Spokane":2czdotz5 said:
Pete also said that Tebow as a backup quarterback is a distraction and felt it was detrimental to Sanchez in NY.....but don't read anything into that, it doesn't fit your philosophy of what "pete" wants
Missing_Clink
New member
- Joined
- Mar 12, 2012
- Messages
- 3,287
- Reaction score
- 1
Spokane":1smghiri said:
Quote my entire post and respond.
Sac
Active member
No, they aren't as close as you'll find.
PC wants a point guard QB, which is what Wilson is. Aside from being able to run, good leadership skills and Jesus, they have nothing in common. RW tied the rookie record for TD passes and had a 100 QB rating on the year.
Tebow couldn't do that. Ever. He is unsound in a fundamental way in his mechanics and clearly doesn't read defenses well.
They aren't close. At all. And they never will be.
PC wants a point guard QB, which is what Wilson is. Aside from being able to run, good leadership skills and Jesus, they have nothing in common. RW tied the rookie record for TD passes and had a 100 QB rating on the year.
Tebow couldn't do that. Ever. He is unsound in a fundamental way in his mechanics and clearly doesn't read defenses well.
They aren't close. At all. And they never will be.
HunnyBadger
New member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2012
- Messages
- 540
- Reaction score
- 0
:snack:
kidhawk":15ts1ehz said:
What do you think Pete would have said about TO ten years ago? "A distration"
Still hired him. Its about need, not the media.
And if Sanchez would let the media change him in any way, then the wind would be detrimental to him, who cares.
seahawksTopGear
New member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2012
- Messages
- 195
- Reaction score
- 0
Tebow is not close to RW, but if he is cut by the jets and we get a steal on a Flynn trade I have no qualms about bringing him in as a vet min backup.
No wildcat, just a backup.
I would never trade Flynn for Tebow and his current contract.
No wildcat, just a backup.
I would never trade Flynn for Tebow and his current contract.
pinksheets
Active member
I don't see why being an effective passer isn't a key aspect of being a 'Wilson JR'.
Largent80
New member
Spokane":ym1wzhol said:
WTF, are you Huggyprelag?
Sac
Active member
There are multiple sources available where the term "Point Guard Quarterback" is used. I'm not going to do your homework for you though, but I will tell you that Google is your friend.
The point everyone here is trying to clue you in on is that Tebow can't pass for shit. That is a prerequisite to being "Wilson Jr."
The point everyone here is trying to clue you in on is that Tebow can't pass for shit. That is a prerequisite to being "Wilson Jr."
pinksheets
Active member
He is you, and you are he.
SacHawk2.0":3vpmvu7l said:
He did everything he was asked. THE CLOWN JETS paid him 33 Million to throw the ball 8 times.
That is on the Jets, case closed.
Now for Tebow and his passing, the cowboy hit on 75% of his passes. So he can pass for shit
Again, when given the chance he hit his targets!
Largent80
New member
Who cares what a clown pays to other clowns, they also drafted and paid Sanchez who can't play QB either. They both blow gigantic chunks and I don't want either of them associated with my winning Seahawk team.
So goodnight sweet prince.
So goodnight sweet prince.
Sac
Active member
6 of 8 last year. A whole 8 attempts.
How about 2011 when, while on the Broncos and had a good running game and defense to support him?
48%
For nearly the whole season.
48%
How about 2011 when, while on the Broncos and had a good running game and defense to support him?
48%
For nearly the whole season.
48%
kearly
New member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 15,975
- Reaction score
- 0
I am fine with a Tebow trade (assuming we can't do better, of course), mainly because you could release Tebow the second he reaches the VMAC and you wouldn't have to pay him a dime. Well, unless Tebow's "dead money" number with the Jets applies to us. If it did, then it would be $14 million in savings compared to $9.5 million for releasing Flynn. Anyway, it would give Seattle a clean escape from Flynn's contract, which would save us up to $15.5 million in cap space that will roll into future seasons.
Tebow isn't a good passer, but he is built for a team like ours that is physical, runs the ball, plays great defense, and is used to being surrounded by a tilt the field QB. Tebow may not be pretty to watch, but neither was T-jack and Pete got T-jack to win 5 of his last 8 games here, while playing hurt. And I know it's cliche, but Tebow really is a "winner." He's often a totally different QB in the 4th quarters of games. I compared Wilson to Tebow last May in terms of his background and intangibles. Both faced discrimination because of a trait. Pete wasn't scared by Wilson's height, maybe he won't be scared by Tebow's throwing problems. Maybe Pete can find ways to minimize Tebow's flaws, the same way Harbaugh did with Alex Smith.
Also, it's an extremely thin year in the draft for read option QBs. The few that are decent will probably be long gone by the time Seattle is willing to draft one.
Tebow isn't a good passer, but he is built for a team like ours that is physical, runs the ball, plays great defense, and is used to being surrounded by a tilt the field QB. Tebow may not be pretty to watch, but neither was T-jack and Pete got T-jack to win 5 of his last 8 games here, while playing hurt. And I know it's cliche, but Tebow really is a "winner." He's often a totally different QB in the 4th quarters of games. I compared Wilson to Tebow last May in terms of his background and intangibles. Both faced discrimination because of a trait. Pete wasn't scared by Wilson's height, maybe he won't be scared by Tebow's throwing problems. Maybe Pete can find ways to minimize Tebow's flaws, the same way Harbaugh did with Alex Smith.
Also, it's an extremely thin year in the draft for read option QBs. The few that are decent will probably be long gone by the time Seattle is willing to draft one.
Sac
Active member
Peter Lalich!
