RolandDeschain wrote:I already had all the visual proof I needed that Oklahoma sucks years ago. Just look at it.
peachesenregalia wrote:naw, Oklahoma does suck. Cost of living's low though, so it's aiight.
RolandDeschain wrote:That's definitely better, Okie; but frankly, any competition against Washington state within the continental United States as far as scenic photos goes is going to lose. Handily.
JesterHawk wrote:So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid?
DTexHawk wrote:JesterHawk wrote:So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid?
I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth.
Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way.
RolandDeschain wrote:Just in case anybody wants to try, I'll throw a few WA-state pics up on here.
JesterHawk wrote:DTexHawk wrote:JesterHawk wrote:So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid?
I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth.
Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way.
I know you may confuse "visually" with "literally" but I was in no way referencing the wind flows other than how they look to be swirling towards a central location, which I dubbed "the butthole" of the image, simply as a way to call Dallas a hemorrhoid.
Just to avoid further confusion, and to make my point inexplicably clear, I am saying that Dallas is a shithole. As evidence, I submit Jerry Jones and the Cowboys. Now, if you prefer to go with the sucking imagery, maybe the epicenter should lie in Dallas, unless Jerry's glory holing days took place in Oklahoma (which is entirely possible).
DTexHawk wrote:JesterHawk wrote:DTexHawk wrote:I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth.
Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way.
I know you may confuse "visually" with "literally" but I was in no way referencing the wind flows other than how they look to be swirling towards a central location, which I dubbed "the butthole" of the image, simply as a way to call Dallas a hemorrhoid.
Just to avoid further confusion, and to make my point inexplicably clear, I am saying that Dallas is a shithole. As evidence, I submit Jerry Jones and the Cowboys. Now, if you prefer to go with the sucking imagery, maybe the epicenter should lie in Dallas, unless Jerry's glory holing days took place in Oklahoma (which is entirely possible).
I can't help you if you are constantly on the lookout for things that look like buttholes.
volsunghawk wrote:RolandDeschain wrote:Just in case anybody wants to try, I'll throw a few WA-state pics up on here.
I'll get back to you with some Colorado stuff... currently bogged down in work.
RolandDeschain wrote:That's definitely better, Okie; but frankly, any competition against Washington state within the continental United States as far as scenic photos goes is going to lose. Handily.
RolandDeschain wrote:I already had all the visual proof I needed that Oklahoma sucks years ago. Just look at it.
Largent80 wrote:California rivals Washington for scenic beauty for sure.
RolandDeschain wrote: Rain forest, mountains, desert, ocean, hot springs, and a moderate climate in a major urban area; no other place in the country has all of these things.
JSeahawks wrote:I wasnt certain about Rain Forest, because I have always heard that the Olympic Peninsula is the only rain forest in the U.S. but apparently thats just you Washingtonian's spreading misinformation. Internet research shows that Washington, Oregon, and Northern California all have Temperate rain forest.
Apparently there's also small area's of rain forest in the southern Appalachian mountains in North Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee.
RolandDeschain wrote:JSeahawks wrote:I wasnt certain about Rain Forest, because I have always heard that the Olympic Peninsula is the only rain forest in the U.S. but apparently thats just you Washingtonian's spreading misinformation. Internet research shows that Washington, Oregon, and Northern California all have Temperate rain forest.
Apparently there's also small area's of rain forest in the southern Appalachian mountains in North Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee.
You remind me of some of the people I knew in Wisconsin. They thought they had some mountains there, in the state of Wisconsin; because some places were called "Mount so-and-so", and actually managed to get higher than 50 feet above street level in Milwaukee or Madison. That doesn't turn your little wannabe mole hill into a mountain, even if it might meet some obscure technical definition for one.
RolandDeschain wrote:J, meet Cascade Mountain, one of Wisconsin's premier skiing places. I'm 100% serious, here's their website: http://www.cascademountain.com/
Here it is. No, this isn't a trick, or a joke; this little mosquito-bump of a hill is "Cascade Mountain", 30 minutes from Madison. I've driven by it a hundred times in my life, and every single time, I've exhibited a laugh, snort, smirk, or giggle, depending on the circumstances. This is the definition of a "ski resort" for Wisconsinites.
RolandDeschain wrote:Sarlacc, I'm truly and honestly sorry that you have to visit Wisconsin to see family.
AbsolutNET wrote:http://www.seahawks.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1010
That's the best proof we have
peachesenregalia wrote:AbsolutNET wrote:http://www.seahawks.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1010
That's the best proof we have
Think you're funny, don't you?
It is currently Tue Apr 24, 2018 6:52 am