| Author |
Message |
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....  Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 8:54 am |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am
Posts: 9334
Location: Monroe, WA
|
|
_________________
Talent can get you to the playoffs.
It takes character to win when you get there.
SUPER BOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
DTexHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 9:00 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 5:55 am
Posts: 3915
|
Very cool. And something appears to be sucking just north of the US border.  This is why storms are so bad in TX/OK. Fronts from the NW meet the humidity from the gulf, and hell breaks loose.
_________________
And this post is not directed at anyone personally.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OkieHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:05 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: Oklahoma City
|
|
That is pretty damn cool. I just hope that it keeps the storms here, we need the precipitation.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:06 am |
|
| *NET FCC Liaison* |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 21733
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
I already had all the visual proof I needed that Oklahoma sucks years ago. Just look at it. 
_________________
Sam Bradford is a game changer.
*He can change a win into a loss.
*He can change a loss into a win by getting injured.
*RedAlice is right.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OkieHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:09 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: Oklahoma City
|
RolandDeschain wrote: I already had all the visual proof I needed that Oklahoma sucks years ago. Just look at it. Where was that taken?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:21 am |
|
| *NET FCC Liaison* |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 21733
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
No clue, it just came up on a Google Image search for Oklahoma. 
_________________
Sam Bradford is a game changer.
*He can change a win into a loss.
*He can change a loss into a win by getting injured.
*RedAlice is right.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OkieHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:24 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: Oklahoma City
|
 I like this one better Roland
|
|
| |
|
|
|
peachesenregalia
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:31 am |
|
| * NET Starfish * |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
Posts: 10118
Location: Helm's Deep
|
|
naw, Oklahoma does suck. Cost of living's low though, so it's aiight.
_________________
Rzzzzz...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OkieHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:36 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: Oklahoma City
|
peachesenregalia wrote: naw, Oklahoma does suck. Cost of living's low though, so it's aiight. Come on Peaches, you don't like Thundersleet or Quakeanadoes? I love the new names for the weather here
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:38 am |
|
| *NET FCC Liaison* |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 21733
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
|
That's definitely better, Okie; but frankly, any competition against Washington state within the continental United States as far as scenic photos goes is going to lose. Handily.
_________________
Sam Bradford is a game changer.
*He can change a win into a loss.
*He can change a loss into a win by getting injured.
*RedAlice is right.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OkieHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:43 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 1642
Location: Oklahoma City
|
RolandDeschain wrote: That's definitely better, Okie; but frankly, any competition against Washington state within the continental United States as far as scenic photos goes is going to lose. Handily. I know man, I'm originally from Oregon, just had to show that there are some "scenic" areas here 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JesterHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:46 am |
|
| * Smackmeister * |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 6849
|
|
So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid?
_________________
President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:47 am |
|
| *NET FCC Liaison* |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 21733
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
|
_________________
Sam Bradford is a game changer.
*He can change a win into a loss.
*He can change a loss into a win by getting injured.
*RedAlice is right.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DTexHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:18 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 5:55 am
Posts: 3915
|
JesterHawk wrote: So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid? I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth. Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way.
_________________
And this post is not directed at anyone personally.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JesterHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:34 am |
|
| * Smackmeister * |
|
|
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 6849
|
DTexHawk wrote: JesterHawk wrote: So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid? I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth. Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way. I know you may confuse "visually" with "literally" but I was in no way referencing the wind flows other than how they look to be swirling towards a central location, which I dubbed "the butthole" of the image, simply as a way to call Dallas a hemorrhoid. Just to avoid further confusion, and to make my point inexplicably clear, I am saying that Dallas is a shithole. As evidence, I submit Jerry Jones and the Cowboys. Now, if you prefer to go with the sucking imagery, maybe the epicenter should lie in Dallas, unless Jerry's glory holing days took place in Oklahoma (which is entirely possible).
_________________
President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013
|
|
| |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:38 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 7529
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
RolandDeschain wrote: Just in case anybody wants to try, I'll throw a few WA-state pics up on here.
I'll get back to you with some Colorado stuff... currently bogged down in work.  _________________  Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DTexHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:38 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 5:55 am
Posts: 3915
|
JesterHawk wrote: DTexHawk wrote: JesterHawk wrote: So visually looking at that map...if Oklahoma is the butthole, does that make Dallas a hemorrhoid? I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth. Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way. I know you may confuse "visually" with "literally" but I was in no way referencing the wind flows other than how they look to be swirling towards a central location, which I dubbed "the butthole" of the image, simply as a way to call Dallas a hemorrhoid. Just to avoid further confusion, and to make my point inexplicably clear, I am saying that Dallas is a shithole. As evidence, I submit Jerry Jones and the Cowboys. Now, if you prefer to go with the sucking imagery, maybe the epicenter should lie in Dallas, unless Jerry's glory holing days took place in Oklahoma (which is entirely possible). I can't help you if you are constantly on the lookout for things that look like buttholes.
_________________
And this post is not directed at anyone personally.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JesterHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 11:48 am |
|
| * Smackmeister * |
|
|
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 5:56 pm
Posts: 6849
|
DTexHawk wrote: JesterHawk wrote: DTexHawk wrote: I know many things confuse you, but with the thread title "....Oklahoma sucks..", Dallas would likely be a mole, as suck usually applies to the function of the mouth.
Now, if you suck with your butthole, then continue on your way. I know you may confuse "visually" with "literally" but I was in no way referencing the wind flows other than how they look to be swirling towards a central location, which I dubbed "the butthole" of the image, simply as a way to call Dallas a hemorrhoid. Just to avoid further confusion, and to make my point inexplicably clear, I am saying that Dallas is a shithole. As evidence, I submit Jerry Jones and the Cowboys. Now, if you prefer to go with the sucking imagery, maybe the epicenter should lie in Dallas, unless Jerry's glory holing days took place in Oklahoma (which is entirely possible). I can't help you if you are constantly on the lookout for things that look like buttholes. Happens everytime I see "Dallas" or a thread that Huggy has participated in. Both of which happened in quick succession before I posted this. My deepest apologies if you live in or near a butthole city.
_________________
President of the Perfect Parents Society - est. 2013
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:05 pm |
|
| *NET FCC Liaison* |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 21733
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
volsunghawk wrote: RolandDeschain wrote: Just in case anybody wants to try, I'll throw a few WA-state pics up on here.
I'll get back to you with some Colorado stuff... currently bogged down in work. Pffft, Colorado's got nothing on WA state. The view of the mountains from Seattle is way more magnificent because of a) ocean, b) green plant life abound, and c) it's viewed from sea level. If you're in Denver, sure, the technical height of the nearby mountain ranges is taller than the Cascades for example, but a lot of the nearby stuff is only a few thousand feet above Denver. Even one of the highest points, Longs Peak, is an hour-and-a-half away from Denver at 14,000 feet. Same approximate height and a slightly longer drive to Mount Rainier from Seattle. Washington also has the only rain forest in North America. I'm not bashing Colorado, I'm just saying Washington's the easy winner, here. How in the world are you going to compare against the additional things WA has over CO? I mean, Colorado has more of the winter trails, ski resorts, etc. obviously; but it's mostly more of the same, know what I mean?
_________________
Sam Bradford is a game changer.
*He can change a win into a loss.
*He can change a loss into a win by getting injured.
*RedAlice is right.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks.... Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:01 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 18444
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
RolandDeschain wrote: That's definitely better, Okie; but frankly, any competition against Washington state within the continental United States as far as scenic photos goes is going to lose. Handily. Washington would definatly be in my top group. Along with in no particular order Oregon, Montana, New Hampshire, Florida, Colorado and California. But imo, without doubt the most beautiful state in the continental united states (not counting Alaska, which easily would win) is Utah. And its not close in my opinion. Washington doesnt have anything that can compare to the Canyonlands, desert area's of Utah. Nor do any of Washington's mountain area's compare to the Provo or Salt Lake area's. Utah:       _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: Mitch and 8 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
