 |
| Author |
Message |
|
red17hawk
|
Post subject: Re: Lol, Sherman wants us to get Woodson  Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 4:45 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 8:52 am
Posts: 31
|
|
Not much to add, except this tweet from earlier today.
Lance Allan @lanceallan
Keep hearing #Patriots are front runners for the services of Charles Woodson. #Seahawks & #Ravens in the mix. #Texans a little farther back
Retweeted by Curtis Crabtree
_________________
Go 'Hawks!
|
|
  |
|
|
|
DJrmb
|
Post subject: Re: Lol, Sherman wants us to get Woodson Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:22 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:53 pm
Posts: 129
|
Woodson would be a good fit I think. But instead of moving Earl around move Chancellor. I know Woodson isn't the big hitter SS type but he has always been noted as a sure/good tackler and would be much better in coverages. You could move Kam down closer to the line for nickel/dime plays putting him in an OLB spot a few times a game. I don't think Sherman would have to worry about his over the top help then with Earl and Woodson behind him He may get hurt a lot (especially recently) but don't let anyone fool you into thinking he isn't physical... http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1466466-green-bay-packers-charles-woodsons-return-brings-physicality
|
|
| |
|
|
|
zayden185
|
Post subject: Re: Lol, Sherman wants us to get Woodson Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:04 am
Posts: 599
|
HawkGA wrote: I doubt it will happen. Probably depends on whether he wants to take one more run at a ring or get one final payday. I'm guessing he wouldn't be getting a payday from Seattle. Money talks
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: Lol, Sherman wants us to get Woodson Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:49 pm |
|
| * NET FCC Liaison * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 19389
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
zayden185 wrote: Money talks Yeah, but the alternative isn't BS to walk, it's another ring. There are more than a few players that want the ring more than the money; or that want their ego appeased by being in Canton one day, and multiple rings makes that a fair deal more likely if they're a pretty good player.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DJrmb
|
Post subject: Re: Lol, Sherman wants us to get Woodson Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:08 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:53 pm
Posts: 129
|
RolandDeschain wrote: zayden185 wrote: Money talks Yeah, but the alternative isn't BS to walk, it's another ring. There are more than a few players that want the ring more than the money; or that want their ego appeased by being in Canton one day, and multiple rings makes that a fair deal more likely if they're a pretty good player. Woodson has already stated money isn't a concern, he just wants to win...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: Lol, Sherman wants us to get Woodson Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:22 pm |
|
| * NET FCC Liaison * |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 19389
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
DJrmb wrote: Woodson has already stated money isn't a concern, he just wants to win... I know, that's half the reason I posted that...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
canucklhead
|
Post subject: Re: Lol, Sherman wants us to get Woodson Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:39 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:08 pm
Posts: 86
|
|
Having flashbacks to when the Giants brought in that old Cowboy Everson Walls in the 1990 season and all he did was bring experience, savvy, and some big plays that helped galvanize the DBack corps on a team that went on to win a Super Bowl.
The parallel is not exact, as Walls was really at the end of his career....but even guys on their last leg, if they are cagey enough, can make plays that lead to success. Some guys are just ballplayers...Woodson is one of those guys.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahawksfan425
|
Post subject: Re: Lol, Sherman wants us to get Woodson Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 1:21 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 5:32 pm
Posts: 1260
Location: Kenmore, WA
|
|
Seahawks beat the Pats this year and we'll be even better next year.
_________________
Skittles - The candy of champions.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: andyh64000, Atradees, baumer64, BeaHUman, BGHawk, Bigpumpkin, blanikbrat, BlueTalon, BocciHawk, camaroboy_69, Canadianhawkfan, capncrunch, Cartire, CEHawk, ChiefHawk, Darrenv17, Digsbone, EastCoastHawksFan, Emerald12, enamel, formido, gargantual, getnasty, Gifted1, Google [Bot], grizbob, HawkGA, HawkGANG, Hawkintent, hawkz09, IBleedBlueAndGreen, IcedHawk, idahohawk, JacksSpleen, jamsomatic, JerHawk81, JimZorn10, JKent82, joeseahawks, Jville, kidhawk, Killa Kam, Largefarva, Lawke, LawlessHawk, LusciousJames, Majestic-12 [Bot], Malfunkshun, Meedsy, MichaelHawk70, MidwestHawker, mirrikat45, mistaowen, mrblitz, nIdahoSeahawk, OrFan, Pak40., piston bully, pocketprotector, QuickLightning, ratso, RobBaker7714409, samwize77, Scottemojo, seahawk12thman, Seanhawk, sedrohawk, SilkMonkey, SilNWest, sjhawkfan, smoothmaw, SPRC, Tailspin Hawk Fan, tdlabrie, Throwdown, tjgamer555, tmartin1313, Trenchbroom, twisted_steel2, v1rotv2, Vantucky Hawk, Vendark, Wee-Bey, WilsonLegend and 261 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
