 |
| Author |
Message |
|
SNDavidson
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:52 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm Posts: 1196
|
|
I think DavidSeven jumped to a conclusion in concluding that we all jumped to a conclusion. In conclusion, we already have mods, no need to tell people what to do.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:54 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am Posts: 2752
|
SharkHawk wrote: -The Glove- wrote: SharkHawk wrote: Good thing Sherman never blew a coverage this year. EVER. He's perfect. And now being a great teammate to boot. Wow, man, wow. A specific play was brought up. He commented on it honestly. Does that mean he's somehow a bad teammate now? What are you talking about? I said he's never blown a coverage. EVER. He's perfect. How does my statement cause you to make such a leap? This is just like twitter. We can say whatever veiled thing we want, and frame it however we want later. I never put in any emoticons alluding to sarcasm. So how do you know I'm not saying Richard Sherman is a great teammate? On an entirely different note..... when you're in kindergarten, you typically learn this little thing about saying nice things. Whether it's "honest" or not, there are some things that don't ever need to be said. Being a good teammate sometimes means shutting your mouth, even when asked a question about a specific play that was one where a teammate didn't play it 100% correct. Maybe as good teammates we say something to the effect of, "Well, there were a lot of plays in that game that could have gone differently, I don't think it's right to point at one specific play." It's "playerspeak" but players who speak that way tend to be much more respected and welcomed by their teammates. Those teams function better. They tend to win. We have rules here too... and although many things we could jump on here and say are TRUE, the rules say we can't attack other posters. So being true doesn't make it right. Or am I wrong there too? Leaving things out there dangling and open to interpretation to a lot of followers like has happened in this case, whether misconstrued or not is not a good idea. Your view differs. Wow, MANNNNNNN, WOW! Didn't read past the first paragraph lol. You don't have to post "emoticons alluding to sarcasm." Sometimes it's pretty obvious.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SNDavidson
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:22 pm Posts: 1196
|
|
Everyone stop concluding things!!!
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am Posts: 2752
|
SNDavidson wrote: Everyone stop concluding things!!! Quit telling us what to do! We have mods! /sarcasm (don't know how to post an emoticon on my phone)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:04 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm Posts: 15440 Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
As a mod I have concluded that we all like to argue about meaninless junk.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:06 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am Posts: 2752
|
JSeahawks wrote: As a mod I have concluded that we all like to argue about meaninless junk. This is very true...gotta love the offseason
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Shadyhawk182
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:20 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:57 am Posts: 139
|
|
Am i too late to get in on the conversation of Kam and Sherm having a barbeque making beef ribs. Thats what this is about right?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:22 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6439
|
|
Sherman runs his mouth and this leads to problems? Not surprised. It's inevitable.
What IS surprising is that Kam Chancellor would rather ply with Kelly Jennings. I mean. It's so dang obvious.
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:24 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm Posts: 15440 Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
Are we sure this isnt all just a fat joke at Brandon Browners expense? He is pretty beefy.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Shadyhawk182
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:27 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:57 am Posts: 139
|
|
L.O.B. Legion Of BEEFcakes
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:27 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6439
|
JSeahawks wrote: Are we sure this isnt all just a fat joke at Brandon Browners expense? He is pretty beefy. Nobody is sure of anything.
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:28 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am Posts: 6579 Location: Covington, Washington
|
bestfightstory wrote: What IS surprising is that Kam Chancellor would rather ply with Kelly Jennings. Just got through watching Starz's Spartacus season 1 and the prequel. This typo gives me bad images that I was hoping to discard.
_________________  "Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians." NFL GM: "How do you stop a Seahawk? Take away his doctor's prescription pad."”
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:31 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6439
|
drdiags wrote: bestfightstory wrote: What IS surprising is that Kam Chancellor would rather ply with Kelly Jennings. Just got through watching Starz's Spartacus season 1 and the prequel. This typo gives me bad images that I was hoping to discard. Ewww... Now I want to fix it to say play, but that doesn't read much better, at this point.
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Shadowhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:46 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:05 am Posts: 620
|
SNDavidson wrote: No idea what that's all about, but Sherm half-called out Kam somewhat by accident on NFL Network when he was discussing the Roddy White TD. He didn't mean to, kind of a heat of the moment, like "I'm not the type to call out my team mates but...". Obviously I have no Idea what they're talking about though. And Sherman probably didn't think he was calling Chancellor out. The only problem is that while he was talking, NFL Network replayed the TD in question and the angle made it painfully clear that Chancellor was the one who got burned. It wasn't so bad by itself, but combined with the replay it made me cringe a little. Chancellor could very well be miffed about it, but if that's the case it's not a big deal. They're adults, they just need to work it out.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
MrCarey
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 7:49 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm Posts: 1482
|
|
Hahaha, offseason is hilarious.
It would be fun to watch these two go to the ring to settle something if necessary. Kam would probably tear that ass up.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SouthSoundHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am Posts: 661
|
|
I've seen these types of tweets back and forth between these guys...it usually has to do with vidoe games or music.
Not putting any stock in this as "beef."
_________________ Go Hawks.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:23 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am Posts: 2752
|
SouthSoundHawk wrote: I've seen these types of tweets back and forth between these guys...it usually has to do with vidoe games or music.
Not putting any stock in this as "beef." I've seen their posts back and forth as well. I wouldn't have thought anything of it if it wasn't for what Kam posted afterwards
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hawken-Dazs
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 8:49 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:50 pm Posts: 407
|
|
Why would Kam tweet about it a day or so after Sherm was on NFLN? I think it's silly tonassume this was about the White TD.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:13 pm |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am Posts: 7229
|
SharkHawk wrote: Good thing Sherman never blew a coverage this year. EVER. He's perfect. And now being a great teammate to boot. Agreed completely. Oh wait, you were being sarcastic, my bad.
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
TheLargentLine
|
Post subject: Re: Kam and Sherman beefing? Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:14 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:35 pm Posts: 189 Location: Olympia
|
|
Not sure what I hate more, the off-season or twitter
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: 12evanf, 12thMan1, arghawkfan, Attyla the Hawk, AVL, BamKam, Basis4day, bellingerga, Bill Assumpcao, bloodkingg, BlueTalon, bryantology79, calihawk, CHawks4L, Chukarhawk, DavidSeven, Floridahawk79, FlyingGreg, Giedi, Google [Bot], goseahawks2012, grizbob, Hamhawk, hedgehawk, JacksSpleen, jammerhawk, jdblack, JKent82, Killa Kam, largenutz, Marvin49, McGruff, NinerLifer, PrepntheSep, Pstark3, quadsas, RampagingMice, razgriz737, red17hawk, SacHawk2.0, Scottemojo, SeahawksFanForever, Shirkophobe, SilNWest, SmokinHawk, Speakinhawk68, Stephen SeaHawking, Terpdragon, titan3131, TorontoHawk, Trenchbroom, TwilightError, twisted_steel2, Uppercase, usc17hawk, vin.couve12, Yoonhawk and 219 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|