 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 20 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Paschtorian
|
Post subject: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!!  Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:42 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:45 pm
Posts: 111
|
|
I realize both are "on the back-nine of their careers",....
...but think about the experience they both could share with our (incredibly) young team.
With the new crop of draftees brought-in by the Seahawks' (weirdly insightful) front office,....
....this team is well-on-its-way to a (no s#&t) dynasty (in the 21st century).
|
|
  |
|
|
|
zayden185
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:46 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:04 am
Posts: 588
|
|
Was thinking same thing about Woodson...give him 3 years, not that he will stay healthy that lo g, just a hired gun. He just gets balls out...need that and not rely on interceptions
|
|
| |
|
|
|
zayden185
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:48 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:04 am
Posts: 588
|
|
I'd take freeney as well...have space and let them go after Super Bowl win or two. Have $ to sign core after their rookie contracts run out
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:53 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 680
|
|
Yes and yes! Their talent would heavily out weight the price tag that JS and PC would offer up.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Paschtorian
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 5:56 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:45 pm
Posts: 111
|
|
I'd offer both a 2-year deal.
Decent money (with incentives).
They'll BOTH jump at that deal.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Cartire
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:01 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:49 am
Posts: 266
|
|
To expensive for backups. They won't be starters, but will expect allpro starter cash. Nope. Not worth it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Veilside
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:29 am
Posts: 514
|
Cartire wrote: To expensive for backups. They won't be starters, but will expect allpro starter cash. Nope. Not worth it. I think they are at the point where they just want a another ring and want to play on a contender. I doubt they'd expect that much.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawk Finn
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:13 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 3:44 am
Posts: 1089
|
|
Nah. Redskins are hesitant to give Orakpo an extension right now; trade for him and sign George Wilson. Cheaper, younger, more effective solution. You're all welcome. Man, I'm great.
_________________
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 300 character limit.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
jlwaters1
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 6:18 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm
Posts: 1893
|
|
I'd avoid the aging vetran route. Why not continue the youth movement.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
chris98251
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:30 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 6144
Location: Renton Wa.
|
|
Mods, can we start a ageing to expensive veteran thread to put all these ideas in that are going to be popping up thru March 12th?
_________________  To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me... .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
v1rotv2
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 8:45 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:32 am
Posts: 3055
Location: Black Diamond, WA.
|
|
What part of younger, faster, bigger do you guys not get?
_________________
...the cockpit is quiet, the stars are bright, it kinda feels like church in here tonight....
|
|
| |
|
|
|
checkdanews
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:21 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:47 am
Posts: 25
Location: Humboldt County, California
|
|
I said the same thing way earlier on the dwight freeny post
*sorry double post*
_________________ Who's the baddest!?....SEA-HAWKS *Biggest Hawks Fan In California* Seahawks + Music = Me
Last edited by checkdanews on Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
checkdanews
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:25 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
|
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:47 am
Posts: 25
Location: Humboldt County, California
|
|
Woodson would be a awesome nickel back, only playing those 15-30 plays a game would keep him healthy, obviously Sherman agree's, and he already stated that he is more worried about another ring, no $$$.
When it comes to Freeny I have a feeling its probably the same deal, he probably wants a ring, he has made enough cash. Add in Clemons injurys, we won't see him for awhile, and the fact that we only have Bruce(who will be starting his 2nd season) and prob some talent from the draft, Freeny would be beyond valuable to our pass rush...far beyond just playing...he could teach Bruce things Clemons just couldn't
_________________ Who's the baddest!?....SEA-HAWKS *Biggest Hawks Fan In California* Seahawks + Music = Me
|
|
| |
|
|
|
chris98251
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 12:28 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 6144
Location: Renton Wa.
|
|
There was a reason he played safety, he has lost a step and isn't as quick.
_________________ To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me... .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
joeshaney
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:14 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:10 pm
Posts: 202
|
|
Yes on Freeney (for the R$ght deal)
No on Woodson.
We can find a nickel back in the draft or already on our roster. why spend the unnecessary money.
Now Freeney would be a great fit. a 1 or 2 year rent a player that would be the ideal tutor for Irvin.
The draft is another possibility,
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pinksheets
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:17 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm
Posts: 2515
Location: Seattle
|
chris98251 wrote: There was a reason he played safety, he has lost a step and isn't as quick. Yeah, from what I've heard from GB fans he wouldn't do well as our nickel corner.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Spokane
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:07 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:35 am
Posts: 680
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawks02
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:36 am |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:53 am
Posts: 304
|
checkdanews wrote: Woodson would be a awesome nickel back, only playing those 15-30 plays a game would keep him healthy, obviously Sherman agree's, and he already stated that he is more worried about another ring, no $$$.
When it comes to Freeny I have a feeling its probably the same deal, he probably wants a ring, he has made enough cash. Add in Clemons injurys, we won't see him for awhile, and the fact that we only have Bruce(who will be starting his 2nd season) and prob some talent from the draft, Freeny would be beyond valuable to our pass rush...far beyond just playing...he could teach Bruce things Clemons just couldn't Seriously??? Woodson would be awesome as a nickelback? The old broke down guy is going to cover the slot receiver. . . . . the shiftiest guy on the field. Probably not the best idea. Did you not watch Trufant all season long get burnt regularly? There is a reason GB moved Woodson to safety. He's old, he's lost many steps, and you can't expect him to routinely cover the quickest guys on the field in man coverage.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
WestcoastSteve
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:30 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 821
|
|
Woodson has broken his collarbone twice in the last 18 months, we might as well resign Trufant so I'd pass. You could talk to me about Freeney, that would be buying low.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Harperville
|
Post subject: Re: I think Woodson and Freeney would BOTH be awesome pickups!! Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:37 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 12:34 pm
Posts: 82
|
|
Woodson's best value is at safety. We don't need help at safety. He'll go cheap to a team like New England.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 20 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: -seanhawk-, 12HawkFan, 425HawkSpark, 671hawk, AbsolutNET, AgentDib, anewby, Attyla the Hawk, Barthawk, BCHawk, Beeker, bestfightstory, BigWig, BirdsCommaAngry, brodad, coorslighthawk, cubbyhawkfan, CurryStopstheRuns, dbmack, Digsbone, drdiags, dunceface, falcongoggles, Floridahawk79, FlyingGreg, FortWorthSeahawk, GawksAtHawks, Ghough, Google [Bot], gwinnUSAF77, HawkAroundTheClock, Hawknballs, HawksBo24, hawksfan1976, HawksSoc, IBleedBlueAndGreen, jack_patera, Jeremy517, Jville, KitsapHawk, largenutz, LusciousJames, MichaelHawk70, mrblitz, onanygivensunday, PrepntheSep, Recon_Hawk, RecoveringMoraFan, rightbench, RynoHawk, SacHawk2.0, Seabean, Seahwkgal, Shadyhawk182, SilNWest, SwissSeahawk, themunn, TorontoHawk, usc17hawk and 217 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
