Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ POLITICS, WAR & RELIGION FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1025 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 52  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 9:56 am 
* NET Philistine *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 10337
Location: Portland, OR
Lulz that the idea that humans aren't innately aggressive is being posted on a football board. That's some cognitive dissonance right there.

_________________
My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:08 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14099
Location: Kirkland, WA
12evanf wrote:
The difference in our thinking is that your goal (or your impression of my goal) is to get a result of no human violence or no gun deaths. My view is that we should target the problems to get as low violence as possible. What you're talking about is a fairy tale, I agree with that.


Huh? I have specifically and blatantly said that such a goal is not possible, and YOU'RE the one saying it's not even improbable to have a perfect utopia. Talk about projecting; good Lord...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:24 pm 
* El Primo *
* El Primo *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 4747
Location: Skagit County, WA
As long as some bitch says, "If you give me 'that', I'll fuck you," there will be violence.

_________________
If you're walking on thin ice, you might as well dance.................................................Mom


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 12:47 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 1701
RolandDeschain wrote:
12evanf wrote:
The difference in our thinking is that your goal (or your impression of my goal) is to get a result of no human violence or no gun deaths. My view is that we should target the problems to get as low violence as possible. What you're talking about is a fairy tale, I agree with that.


Huh? I have specifically and blatantly said that such a goal is not possible, and YOU'RE the one saying it's not even improbable to have a perfect utopia. Talk about projecting; good Lord...


Earlier you said the root problem is violence after posting that silly cartoon. Then you say no one takes the time to solve the root problem as evidenced in this post:

RolandDeschain wrote:
The point is, maybe we should look into trying to solve the root cause of the problem, rather than trying to get rid of the easiest tools used by those that murder. You do realize that western European countries where guns are very hard to obtain have significantly higher stabbings per capita, right? Plenty less people die, of course; but plenty of people still stab others for every perceived reason under the sun. Banning guns will not affect the root problem.

Then again, the vast majority of people are never actually in favor of solving the root causes of problems in this world, they just want to do either what is easiest, what is cheapest, or what is most emotionally charged for them. Not a single one of which is the right thing to do to actually fix problems, in most cases. It's like sweeping dust under the rug instead of sweeping it up or vacuuming it and then disposing of it; you're just pushing the problem around, not making it disappear.


After a post like that, I took it to mean that you think looking for legislative solutions that offer more gun training, and more tools for law enforcement as dismissable, because both look for ways to manage our country's guns safely. Neither address the "root problem" that you identify as human violence.

Then you post a link to Cracked.com showing case studies of the natural evil and ignorance of humans after Sonic suggested a future with no violence. I point out that those same studies also provide education to learn our own evil behaviors and potentially prevent them (knowledge is power!). I was loosely suggesting that Sonic may be right. If we can become totally aware of our actions, maybe we can become a non-violent species... in like a million years.

Solving the "root problem" as you suggest would be to solve human violence, yet you criticize me for thinking a Utopia is probable. Get real, and learn reading comprehension.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:31 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14099
Location: Kirkland, WA
I actually think that finding a way to make people accountable for their own actions, both minor and major, is something we really need. Before anybody points out that people are accountable for their actions...No, they're not. You know how many burglars get caught? Just over 1 out of every 10 get solved.

What a joke. Even murder rates aren't very good, though they're a lot better than burglary, for obvious reasons. In 2011, 64.8% of homicides were solved. You've got better than a 1 in 3 chance of getting away with murder. If you plan it carefully and are intelligent, I'm guessing that number goes down significantly. "Solved" homicides include assailants that get shot & killed by police after having just killed people, crimes of passion where it's a murder-suicide, murderers who turn themselves in, etc. For someone who performs premeditated murder and is intelligent, I'd guess the solve rate is below 40%. Maybe even significantly below that. That's just a guess, though; I haven't been able to find anything in a few minutes of Googling to verify this one way or the other.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:46 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 1701
RolandDeschain wrote:
I actually think that finding a way to make people accountable for their own actions, both minor and major, is something we really need. Before anybody points out that people are accountable for their actions...No, they're not. You know how many burglars get caught? Just over 1 out of every 10 get solved.

What a joke. Even murder rates aren't very good, though they're a lot better than burglary, for obvious reasons. In 2011, 64.8% of homicides were solved. You've got better than a 1 in 3 chance of getting away with murder. If you plan it carefully and are intelligent, I'm guessing that number goes down significantly. "Solved" homicides include assailants that get shot & killed by police after having just killed people, crimes of passion where it's a murder-suicide, murderers who turn themselves in, etc. For someone who performs premeditated murder and is intelligent, I'd guess the solve rate is below 40%. Maybe even significantly below that. That's just a guess, though; I haven't been able to find anything in a few minutes of Googling to verify this one way or the other.


Homicide solving is around 65%. Much lower than it used to be. While all well and good, that still follows more under "give law enforcement better tools" not "solve the root problem."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2013 3:54 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14099
Location: Kirkland, WA
Wrongful imprisonment is also down over the past few decades. :) Better tools (DNA testing, specifically) have made homicides both easier and harder to solve, in some ways. Civil rights have sure come more into the mainstream eye, you can literally get away with murder on the tiniest of technicalities nowadays, whereas that didn't happen as much a few decades back. Regardless, why the solve rate for murder has been going down while the percentage of murders has also been dropping is a separate topic and a lengthy one.

There is tremendous evidence of my opinion that people will by and large do things they think they can get away with, though.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 8:51 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm
Posts: 735
I think we should get rid of all guns like Japan but i know that would never happen. I believe we should do something about the war on drugs, I feel like a lot of these shootings are gang related. Possibly see how Washingtons and Denvers gunshot death rate go after the new legalization of Weed.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:31 pm 
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
Posts: 4739
Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
It's sad that Fox News is the only media outlet willing to publish pro-gun articles such as this one. Had this man been unarmed, he would have been a victim, subject to the whims of those invading his home.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/02/06/la ... =obnetwork

_________________
Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro

He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:37 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 1701
SmokinHawk wrote:
It's sad that Fox News is the only media outlet willing to publish pro-gun articles such as this one. Had this man been unarmed, he would have been a victim, subject to the whims of those invading his home.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/02/06/la ... =obnetwork


This happened this week in my town. http://www.theolympian.com/2013/02/10/2 ... ounds.html
Intruder high on meth, warned to stop, instead charged the homeowner and got shot.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 12:38 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14099
Location: Kirkland, WA
Too bad that guy didn't just kill him, 12evanf. (I'm serious.)

How many fewer home invasions would we see if every household in America was armed and had one or more people in there that knew how to use their weapon, I wonder?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:15 pm 
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
Posts: 4739
Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
12evanf wrote:
SmokinHawk wrote:
It's sad that Fox News is the only media outlet willing to publish pro-gun articles such as this one. Had this man been unarmed, he would have been a victim, subject to the whims of those invading his home.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/02/06/la ... =obnetwork


This happened this week in my town. http://www.theolympian.com/2013/02/10/2 ... ounds.html
Intruder high on meth, warned to stop, instead charged the homeowner and got shot.


If Obama truly had his way, this person would have been a victim, guaranteed. If this were the UK, the individual who was defending his home and family would have been convicted on murder charges as self defense can't be claimed in the courts there.

_________________
Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro

He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:13 pm 
* 17Power Blogger *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9692
12evanf wrote:
SmokinHawk wrote:
It's sad that Fox News is the only media outlet willing to publish pro-gun articles such as this one. Had this man been unarmed, he would have been a victim, subject to the whims of those invading his home.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/02/06/la ... =obnetwork


This happened this week in my town. http://www.theolympian.com/2013/02/10/2 ... ounds.html
Intruder high on meth, warned to stop, instead charged the homeowner and got shot.


So because some people aren't stopped by guns, we should rarify guns and screw over more of those who might otherwise be helped? What kind of logic is that?

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!

Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

Follow me on Twitter at @17power


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 2:57 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 1701
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
12evanf wrote:
SmokinHawk wrote:
It's sad that Fox News is the only media outlet willing to publish pro-gun articles such as this one. Had this man been unarmed, he would have been a victim, subject to the whims of those invading his home.

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/02/06/la ... =obnetwork


This happened this week in my town. http://www.theolympian.com/2013/02/10/2 ... ounds.html
Intruder high on meth, warned to stop, instead charged the homeowner and got shot.


So because some people aren't stopped by guns, we should rarify guns and screw over more of those who might otherwise be helped? What kind of logic is that?


That instance DID stop the intruder. I was tyring to be unpartisan and throw Smokin a bone. The local sheriff came out and said that the case was the perfect example of a home owner protecting himself.

Intruders high on meth is a good case to want a gun.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:08 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:03 am
Posts: 1774
12evanf wrote:
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
12evanf wrote:

This happened this week in my town. http://www.theolympian.com/2013/02/10/2 ... ounds.html
Intruder high on meth, warned to stop, instead charged the homeowner and got shot.


So because some people aren't stopped by guns, we should rarify guns and screw over more of those who might otherwise be helped? What kind of logic is that?


That instance DID stop the intruder. I was tyring to be unpartisan and throw Smokin a bone. The local sheriff came out and said that the case was the perfect example of a home owner protecting himself.

Intruders are a good case to want a gun.


Fixed it for ya.

_________________
Member formally known as AC59


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:42 pm 
* 17Power Blogger *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 9692
12evanf wrote:
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
12evanf wrote:
This happened this week in my town. http://www.theolympian.com/2013/02/10/2 ... ounds.html
Intruder high on meth, warned to stop, instead charged the homeowner and got shot.


So because some people aren't stopped by guns, we should rarify guns and screw over more of those who might otherwise be helped? What kind of logic is that?


That instance DID stop the intruder. I was tyring to be unpartisan and throw Smokin a bone. The local sheriff came out and said that the case was the perfect example of a home owner protecting himself.

Intruders high on meth is a good case to want a gun.


Ah. I misinterpreted you, sorry.

_________________
GO HAWKS!!!

Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!

Follow me on Twitter at @17power


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:55 pm 
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
Posts: 4739
Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
12evanf wrote:
MontanaHawk05 wrote:
12evanf wrote:

This happened this week in my town. http://www.theolympian.com/2013/02/10/2 ... ounds.html
Intruder high on meth, warned to stop, instead charged the homeowner and got shot.


So because some people aren't stopped by guns, we should rarify guns and screw over more of those who might otherwise be helped? What kind of logic is that?


That instance DID stop the intruder. I was tyring to be unpartisan and throw Smokin a bone. The local sheriff came out and said that the case was the perfect example of a home owner protecting himself.

Intruders high on meth is a good case to want a gun.


Just like defending one's home and property from hordes of looters, such as the kinds which came out of the woodwork in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, is a good case to want a gun with a lot of rounds.

_________________
Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro

He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:05 pm 
* El Primo *
* El Primo *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 4747
Location: Skagit County, WA
Beware the Hordes of Umatilla!!

_________________
If you're walking on thin ice, you might as well dance.................................................Mom


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 5:47 pm 
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:29 am
Posts: 4739
Location: Not Umatilla, Oregon
LymonHawk wrote:
Beware the Hordes of Umatilla!!


Those Mexican gangbangers can be a scary bunch when they band together.

In reality, Tri-Cities, with its approximately 250,000 inhabitants, just 25 miles to the North of Umatilla (where I haven't lived in well over a year), would be an issue in the event of a major catastrophe. Anyone in a populated area, so interested in preserving ownership of their stuff in the wake of a natural disaster, should own one of the rifles presently being demonized by the media.

I suppose it's a good thing Washington State isn't prone to catastrophic events like wind storms, land slides, earthquakes, and erupting volcanoes. Oh, wait...

Well, if one of those disasters DOES happen, we can trust the government to make everything turn out ok, right? Right?

_________________
Feel free to contact me if you need legal assistance. I have a great lawyer that helped me with an ex who violated my privacy and kept harassing me on MySpace and Facebook. He's very good. And there is legal precedent. - linuxpro

He is hold back the legion of boom - skater18000


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Gun control and violence
 Post Posted: Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:46 pm 
* Navy Badass *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16255
Location: Bothell
Thought I'd post this here, rather than yet another thread showing how absolutely stupid California politics are. According to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California), pretty much any military veteran probably has PTSD and shouldn't be allowed to buy guns.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2013/03/08/feinstein_veterans_may_have_ptsd_and_should_not_be_exempt_from_assault_weapons_ban.html

_________________
I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1025 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 ... 52  Next

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ POLITICS, WAR & RELIGION FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: SmokinHawk and 16 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.