| Author |
Message |
|
sainthawk29
|
Post subject: Richard Seymour?  Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:53 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:15 am
Posts: 326
|
|
I think he is a logical canidate to in free agency.
He will probably come cheap as he is on the last legs of his career. Maybe not a everydown player but could offer a pass rush from the DT spot.
I more i think about the more it makes sense.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Seymour? Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 12:17 pm |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 8773
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
|
|
Oh GOD yes! ...if it were still 2004. But since it's not, no thank you.
_________________
My milkshake brings all the turtles to the yard.... damn right... and men's room Drakkar... damn right... and men's room Drakkar.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Seymour? Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:08 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 2090
Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
wow, that dudes still playing..?
_________________
On to the Next Episode
|
|
| |
|
|
|
loafoftatupu
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Seymour? Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:53 pm |
|
| *Loaf of Smack* |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:17 pm
Posts: 2369
Location: Auburn, WA
|
|
It might be kind of fun. Rotate the guy in to cause some trouble with a chance to win the SB if he plays well. Not for any crazy money though.
_________________
"What Jefferson was saying was, Hey! You know, we left this England place 'cause it was bogus; so if we don't get some cool rules ourselves - pronto - we'll just be bogus too! Get it?" -- Jeff Spicoli
|
|
| |
|
|
|
getnasty
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Seymour? Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:22 pm
Posts: 527
|
|
Seymour with a incentive heavy contract sounds great to me. Don't get me wrong i still would want to bring in Melton, Bryant, Etc. but i think Seymour still has something left in the tank.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
nanomoz
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Seymour? Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:30 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 4205
Location: UT
|
|
I'd look into it. The dude is still a great pass rusher for his position. He could be a pass rush upgrade to Red at the 5-tech, and he could rotate as a 3 tech.
Seymour--even at 32/33--would be the best pass rushing DT this team has had since Rocky Bernard.
Potentially a great band-aid for a team that's got a shot right now.
_________________
“We need to be challenged, ... and we need to be under the gun to respond.” --Pete Carroll
|
|
| |
|
|
|
WestcoastSteve
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Seymour? Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:12 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 823
|
|
I am curious to see if the Saints will cut Will Smith. He's a 5 technique candidate who would possibly be better than Bryant.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Richard Seymour? Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:23 am |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 6713
|
|
Never trust a players "decline" while w/Raiders. For whatever reason players look too old there. Moss and Woodson were others that looked done while in Oakland.
I love Seymours passion for the game and his position. He'd fit right in.
_________________
@ryanadamdavis
|
|
| |
|
|
|
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
