| Author |
Message |
|
Bus035
|
Post subject: Percy Harvin's Availaibility  Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:10 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 11:56 am
Posts: 3
|
|
Personally, I am a diehard Seahawk fan. As I know all of the rest of you are. How would you feel about a Flynn/3rd Round flip for Harvin/Joe Webb (very hypothetical)? Harvin is a game changer and we all know what the Vikings were able to accomplish with Favre, Harvin, and Rice. Furthermore, I am very intrigued by the possibility of Harvin, Rice, and Wilson working together. I believe Harvin would immensely improve our team. Also, I am a slight Golden Tate fan but I think he is an obvious "poor man's" version to Harvin, just my opinion. I would love others thoughts.............Thanks!
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Shadyhawk182
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:21 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 12:57 am
Posts: 140
|
|
With Wilson at QB Harvin would be deadly.
That would be a great move as long as they got another WR or drafted one as well.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Geologic
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:29 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 2:45 pm
Posts: 22
|
|
I don't think we should spend money on another YAC Wide Receiver when we have Tate and Baldwin. While Harvin is on another talent level then those two, I'd still rather see the Seahawks sign a deep threat receiver instead if the Seahawks sign a big name WR during free agency.
_________________
"Go Hawks"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BigMeach
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:30 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:11 am
Posts: 251
|
|
Isnt Garvin a slot receiver? Wouldn't that make Baldwin the poor man's Harvin?
_________________
"Know thy self, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories." - Sun Tzu
|
|
| |
|
|
|
mech.romance
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:30 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:54 am
Posts: 28
|
|
Harvin has some character issues that I would be worried about. He fought teammates and punched coaches in Florida, and everything hasn't exactly been kosher in Vikings. Percy Harvin may be an impact player, but I'm not sure if he risk is worth the reward that you get with him.
_________________ I like a little...
Science In My Fiction
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sandpoint Hawk
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:30 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:36 pm
Posts: 273
|
|
Doesn't Harvin have Migraine problems or something of that sort? But yes Havin in this Offense would be Awesome!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
dunceface
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:32 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am
Posts: 1914
|
|
I love Percy Harvin but I really just don't see us doing THAT much in FA this year...
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Rat
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:33 pm |
|
| * NET Cynic * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:42 pm
Posts: 3492
Location: St. Louis, MO
|
|
The Vikings seem pretty committed to Ponder for the time being, for some reason, so I doubt they'd do that deal. However, Harvin is only 24 and already one of the best wideouts in the game. I'd have no problem sending them our first rounder.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:40 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 1291
|
|
I prefer Tate and Baldwin than Harvin.
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Axx
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:45 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm
Posts: 747
|
dunceface wrote: I love Percy Harvin but I really just don't see us doing THAT much in FA this year... Percy Harvin ≠ win in Atlanta
|
|
| |
|
|
|
TJH
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 2:45 pm |
|
| *NET #1 Sherman Fan* |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 2:14 pm
Posts: 236
|
|
Harvin is waaaaay better than Tate or Baldwin.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zebulon Dak
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:06 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 10042
Location: King In The North
|
|
Harvin is not that much better than Tate, if at all.
_________________   Tanzania¹²
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 691
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
|
_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
| |
|
|
|
WestcoastSteve
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 823
|
|
I think it would cost too much to acquire him, he's a great athlete but I wouldn't give up a 2nd rounder for him and I'm sure that's what it's going to take.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:47 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 993
Location: The 5-0
|
|
The operative word in this thread title is "availability". When Harvin isn't experiencing migranes, and/or can stay on the field, he is definitely top notch. It's been suggested we pick him up (basically) to replace Tate. IMO, that would be a huge error and a huge step backwards with our O progress. We've spent a lot of time and money developing Tate and his recent success suggests that was time and money well spent. Add to that the fact he has a year with Wilson, building chemistry, and we'd be insane to even think about reducing his role.
I would definitely like to pick up a burner, but don't believe we absolutely need one. Not bad enough to mess with the current chemistry and not bad enough to dole out a fortune for. I'm hoping such money is spent on the D line, LB and an upgrade to the O line. I'm hopeful JS and PC have their sights set on some mid to late-round burner that we will cost us peanuts while developing. Regardless, Wilson is going to score us points, bank on that.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:48 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am
Posts: 6400
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Lords of Scythia
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am
Posts: 524
|
|
Oi, lads, anyone fancy a wee pisser-up?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
misfit
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 4:00 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 267
|
|
Harvin is a #1.
Seattle has not had a true #1 WR since Steve Largent.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Yugoslavian
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 4:29 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 9:45 am
Posts: 849
Location: Bellevue, WA
|
misfit wrote: Harvin is a #1.
Seattle has not had a true #1 WR since Steve Largent. Rice is borderline #1 so this will mearly be a luxury roster addition. Can you make a role for a player like him? Absolutely. But it is completely a luxury and not a need what so ever. _________________  Anyone want to make me a new signature? I've held out hope long enough. 95% of the time I'm viewing here and/or posting is being done on a mobile device. Pardon any spelling, punctuation, or grammar mistakes.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Rat
|
Post subject: Re: Percy Harvin's Availaibility Posted: Sun Feb 10, 2013 4:38 pm |
|
| * NET Cynic * |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:42 pm
Posts: 3492
Location: St. Louis, MO
|
|
How is an explosive offensive weapon a "luxury"? We need playmaking receivers.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: decaff907, Fuzzman55, gargantual, Google [Bot], grizbob, HawKnPeppa, jammerhawk, kearly, Lawke, Msfann, ryan419_2002, slipwax, themunn, TwilightError and 55 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
