 |
| Author |
Message |
|
Veilside
|
Post subject: Re: SI's Don Banks: 2012 NFL re-draft, 3 Hawks go top 15  Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:59 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 8:29 am
Posts: 514
|
|
I love Bruce, but out of all the choices left at #15 it'd be hard not to take Brockers. Knowing that a penetrating 3 Tech is our biggest need right now, it'd be nice to have that already taken care of. Hayward would be nice at nickle CB but thats not really something you want to spend a 1st rounder on. Barron/Smith would also be nice safety options while Hightower could be a strong MLB.
Who would you take with whats left at #15?
|
|
  |
|
|
|
scutterhawk
|
Post subject: Re: SI's Don Banks: 2012 NFL re-draft, 3 Hawks go top 15 Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:52 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 2101
|
benbu75 wrote: DavidSeven wrote: The biggest travesty was Schneider finishing a distant third behind ELWAY in the EOTY voting. Seriously, what did Elway accomplish that offseason besides make the biggest no brainer personnel decision of ALL TIME. Oh, and he accepted the lesser of two trader offers for Tebow ....just cause. I think it was more in the fact that he was the one that was able to get the deal done. Lots of teams made the decision that they wanted to get Peyton Manning, including the Seahawks. The difference is in wanting and DOING. That said, I think what John Schneider did in the draft was FAR more impressive with the amount of real contribution he was able to get out of Irvin, Wagner, Wilson, Turbin, Lane, Sweezy, and Scruggs. A HOF Quarterback, coaxing a future HOF Quarterback to take the rein$, and run the Bronco$ $ystem any way he wanted, and be in the AFC and have a chance at playing again$t little brother in a $uper Bowl?,, yeah, that would be a tough ta$k. I'm surprised that Elway didn't win the whole enchilada.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
therealjohncarlson
|
Post subject: Re: SI's Don Banks: 2012 NFL re-draft, 3 Hawks go top 15 Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:00 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 2717
|
scutterhawk wrote: benbu75 wrote: DavidSeven wrote: The biggest travesty was Schneider finishing a distant third behind ELWAY in the EOTY voting. Seriously, what did Elway accomplish that offseason besides make the biggest no brainer personnel decision of ALL TIME. Oh, and he accepted the lesser of two trader offers for Tebow ....just cause. I think it was more in the fact that he was the one that was able to get the deal done. Lots of teams made the decision that they wanted to get Peyton Manning, including the Seahawks. The difference is in wanting and DOING. That said, I think what John Schneider did in the draft was FAR more impressive with the amount of real contribution he was able to get out of Irvin, Wagner, Wilson, Turbin, Lane, Sweezy, and Scruggs. A HOF Quarterback, coaxing a future HOF Quarterback to take the rein$, and run the Bronco$ $ystem any way he wanted, and be in the AFC and have a chance at playing again$t little brother in a $uper Bowl?,, yeah, that would be a tough ta$k. I'm surprised that Elway didn't win the whole enchilada. funny. People didnt think it was such an easy sell when Peyton was going around flying to about 10 cities being wooed
|
|
| |
|
|
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: SI's Don Banks: 2012 NFL re-draft, 3 Hawks go top 15 Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2013 2:09 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 6610
Location: Covington, Washington
|
Off-topic. Back to the EOTY deal. It was voted on by NFL Front office and coaches, so among his peers, John Schneider wasn't deemed the best. Wasn't a fan vote or player vote but a vote among his peers. Now maybe they didn't vote him in due to their admiration for the whole Colts story or maybe because John and Pete are so counter-Conventional Wisdom? Who knows? The other teams staffs could just not like a lot of things going on with this team and it is part of a grudge? As long as folks take into account who voted for EOTY when making their arguments then at least they know the lay of the field. Many assumed this was a writer's selected award. It was spelled out who votes for what on the Sporting News page announcing the awards. Quote: ABOUT THE AWARDS
Sporting News polled more than 800 NFL players, coaches and executives for our 2012 awards. Everyone voted for offensive and defensive player of the year, rookie of the year and comeback player of the year. Only coaches and executives voted for coach of the year, coordinator of the year, executive of the year and SN’s All-Pro team.
_________________  "Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians." NFL GM: "How do you stop a Seahawk? Take away his doctor's prescription pad."”
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Russ Willstrong
|
Post subject: Re: SI's Don Banks: 2012 NFL re-draft, 3 Hawks go top 15 Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:30 am |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 5:31 am
Posts: 372
|
|
JS may have finished #3
Atleast he got #3 'the Finisher'. Both JS and RW are no 1 in my book.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawKnPeppa
|
Post subject: Re: SI's Don Banks: 2012 NFL re-draft, 3 Hawks go top 15 Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:06 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 1231
|
|
New strategy to get JS Exec of Year. Let's totally tank it in 2013, then win it all the next year. Sarcasm off!
_________________
"A couple years from now Wilson will be forgotten about and you will forget I said he would fail" (Cboom, 2012)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JGreen79
|
Post subject: Re: SI's Don Banks: 2012 NFL re-draft, 3 Hawks go top 15 Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 11:03 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:26 pm
Posts: 283
Location: Oregon
|
|
Although I beleive JS should have won the award, I'm not as upset at it going to indy as most are... They only had 8 of their 22 starters on the team last year, which should hold some merit.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 12HawkFan, Bakergirl, baumer64, Bigpumpkin, BirdsCommaAngry, Blitzer88, bubbrubb, decaff907, Deterrence, dracolich81, GeekHawk, Google [Bot], Hachtung, hgwellz12, Leep, lukerguy, oregonhawkfan, Pandion Haliaetus, Seaswab, StaffAmerica74, Stone Cold, Sturm, therealjohncarlson, TwilightError, Veilside, yeash28 and 111 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
