Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm Posts: 10265 Location: Anchorage, AK
SonicHawk wrote:
If only you could shoot those 25%.
MysterMatt wrote:
Poppycock.
It's so wonderful the kind of brilliant insight the two of you have added to this discussion here
MysterMatt
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:44 am
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:12 am Posts: 5986
You're the one making arguments based on imaginary numbers, so don't be mad at me.
kidhawk
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:45 am
* NET Staff Alumni *
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm Posts: 10265 Location: Anchorage, AK
MysterMatt wrote:
You're the one making arguments based on imaginary numbers, so don't be mad at me.
I have made no arguments based on imaginary numbers. Just because you don't like them doesn't mean they aren't real.
Just for fun, I did a quick google search and found a gallup poll from December 2012. The question was:
Do you believe there should or should not be a law that would ban the possession of handguns, except by police and other authorized persons?
Those who said we should - 24% Those who said shouldn't - 74% and 2% had no opinion.
Now this question doesn't say the words repeal 2nd amendment, but according to the supreme court, this law is not legal under the constitution, so for it to be put into law, it would have to come with a repeal of the 2nd amendment.
As stated, I don't see this as a number great enough to get any kind of traction in repealing the 2nd amendment, but the statement I made was a large contingent of the minority want to see it done. If 49% is a minority, and 24% is 48% of that minority, then IMO, 24% is a rather large contingent of the minority.
Now, if you'd like to actually add anything of merit to the conversation other than your trolling idiocy, feel free.
MysterMatt
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:12 am
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:12 am Posts: 5986
Nope, my only intent was to keep you honest. No need for you to keep acting like such a Nancy. BTW, the poll you found to back up your imagined numbers is from Gallup. Everyone knows that they're always wrong.
kidhawk
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:22 am
* NET Staff Alumni *
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm Posts: 10265 Location: Anchorage, AK
MysterMatt wrote:
Nope, my only intent was to keep you honest. No need for you to keep acting like such a Nancy. BTW, the poll you found to back up your imagined numbers is from Gallup. Everyone knows that they're always wrong.
Whatever
The Outfield
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:39 am
NET Veteran
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am Posts: 1164
MysterMatt wrote:
BTW, the poll you found to back up your imagined numbers is from Gallup. Everyone knows that they're always wrong.
I hope you're not trying to display intelligence.
MysterMatt
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:56 am
*TOP 5 SUPPORTER*
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:12 am Posts: 5986
The Outfield wrote:
MysterMatt wrote:
BTW, the poll you found to back up your imagined numbers is from Gallup. Everyone knows that they're always wrong.
I hope you're not trying to display intelligence.
it's generally wasted in here, so jerking people like you and kidhawk (who occasionally has interesting things to say when he isn't hyperventilating) is a much better use of my limited time.
The Outfield
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:13 am
NET Veteran
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am Posts: 1164
MysterMatt wrote:
The Outfield wrote:
MysterMatt wrote:
BTW, the poll you found to back up your imagined numbers is from Gallup. Everyone knows that they're always wrong.
I hope you're not trying to display intelligence.
it's generally wasted in here, so jerking people like you and kidhawk (who occasionally has interesting things to say when he isn't hyperventilating) is a much better use of my limited time.
I'm starting to notice that.
kidhawk
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:25 am
* NET Staff Alumni *
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm Posts: 10265 Location: Anchorage, AK
MysterMatt wrote:
The Outfield wrote:
MysterMatt wrote:
BTW, the poll you found to back up your imagined numbers is from Gallup. Everyone knows that they're always wrong.
I hope you're not trying to display intelligence.
it's generally wasted in here, so jerking people like you and kidhawk (who occasionally has interesting things to say when he isn't hyperventilating) is a much better use of my limited time.
Thus my "whatever" comment
SonicHawk
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:27 am
NET Veteran
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm Posts: 2365
The Outfield has yet to bring anything to the table except utter bullshit. At least I believe kidhawk comes from some sort of experience/intelligence.
Nope, my only intent was to keep you honest. No need for you to keep acting like such a Nancy. BTW, the poll you found to back up your imagined numbers is from Gallup. Everyone knows that they're always wrong.
Whatever
To Nellie from Nancy
_________________ Still missing you everyday pal.
kidhawk
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:36 pm
* NET Staff Alumni *
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm Posts: 10265 Location: Anchorage, AK
The Radish wrote:
kidhawk wrote:
MysterMatt wrote:
Nope, my only intent was to keep you honest. No need for you to keep acting like such a Nancy. BTW, the poll you found to back up your imagined numbers is from Gallup. Everyone knows that they're always wrong.
The Outfield has yet to bring anything to the table except utter bullshit. At least I believe kidhawk comes from some sort of experience/intelligence.
What a terrible thing to say.
Outfield brings much to the table first from one side and then the other.
And kidhawk? Well I can't very well say bad things about him as he passed on banning me several times in years way past when Ravenhawk and I were ganging up on whatsyurprob.
_________________ Still missing you everyday pal.
SilNWest
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 12:00 pm
NET Veteran
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 12:51 am Posts: 605 Location: Auburn, Wa
Here's an unreasonable search btw, happened in late january before the LAPD cop shootings:
They don't really have to change the bill of rights... just ignore it.
scutterhawk
Post subject: Re: Bill of Rights
Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2013 1:16 pm
NET Veteran
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm Posts: 2088
I don't agree that thousands of innocent people are living and dying with the consequences of people that are stubbornly exagerating their RIGHTS to including killing anyone that offers up opposition, but, I'm flexible to the possible thousands of differing interpretations by all. Piss on the bystanders, they've made their choices to not arm themselves.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum