| Author |
Message |
|
Chawker
|
Post subject: This years draft Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 9:26 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:18 am Posts: 1238 Location: corner of 40th & plum
|
|
2012 was a great draft for the seahawks, mainly with drafting Russell Wilson in the third round. Although 8 out of there 10 picks defensive players (minus JR) and we seen a significant increase in our defense. 2013's draft will be a more balanced selection of players with our first round pick going to a offensive position to help RW. RW's performance in the pro bowl was a defining moment with the need for a receiving TE. A true "go to guy" on third down and to be that red zone receiver that RW can relay on to get open. I do believe that finding RW a receiver that can get open on a regular basis will be addressed in the first two rounds of this draft. I know PC has stated that we need to address the pass rush, which can be done a couple differant ways, but I believe that issue is secondary to our offensive needs.
RD1 TE RD2 WR RD3 DE/OLB RD4 DT RD5 OL
_________________ Joplo Bartu needs to be signed. PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
onanygivensunday
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 11:35 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am Posts: 2107
|
|
If you flop the TE pick with the DT pick, I believe that is a pretty fair guess on what the Hawks will do.
I can also foresee the Hawk trading Matt Flynn on draft day by swapping either 2nd or 3rd round picks with either Kansas City or more likely, with Jacksonville.
I could also see the Hawks doing the same trade with the Jets, but that would have to be a swap of 2nd round picks in order to get the right value for Flynn considering the Jets pick 9th.
_________________ "Wilson will come in there pissing lightning and crapping thunder! Watch out!" ... Tech Worlds, 5/9/2012
Endzorn, 3 min. later... "Football aside, I would pay money to see that. I'm serious."
Moved to Seattle in 1980. Hawks fan for 33 years and counting.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
T-Sizzle
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 12:14 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am Posts: 1133
|
|
I wouldn't mind at all if the hawks took Jordan Reed at #25. They like to reach and make weird picks.
_________________ "??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games." -SoulfishHawk "16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know." - Tsizzle "OMFG! LOL! Are you for real?"  -ivotuk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawkfan68
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 1:56 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am Posts: 2643 Location: Sammamish, WA
|
|
I disagree with the OP. Zach Miller is a proven receiving TE. What is needed is letting Zach be just that. Therefore drafting a receiving TE shouldn't be first priority (IMO) and nowhere near day draft pick. There are areas with more significant needs such as DT, DE, OLB, OT, and WR. It will be a travesty if they choose to pick a TE in the first round. But stranger things have happened.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
chris98251
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:26 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm Posts: 6156 Location: Renton Wa.
|
|
If we get consistent Gaurd play Miller can be in the pattern more and show his receiving skills, cart before the horse situation just as our D line needs pressure and penetration so our secondary doesn't get deep balls thrown on them and they are not in coverage as long. Snyone in the NFL can get open given 4 or 5 seconds to make some additional cutbacks etc.
_________________  To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me... .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
T-Sizzle
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 2:55 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 8:14 am Posts: 1133
|
hawkfan68 wrote: I disagree with the OP. Zach Miller is a proven receiving TE. What is needed is letting Zach be just that. Therefore drafting a receiving TE shouldn't be first priority (IMO) and nowhere near day draft pick. There are areas with more significant needs such as DT, DE, OLB, OT, and WR. It will be a travesty if they choose to pick a TE in the first round. But stranger things have happened. They are/have been looking for a receiving TE though, that was the reason they brought in Winslow. Miller is a good receiver but he is not dynamic, he is however a GREAT Blocker. What they are looking for is an Aaron Hernandez type....Zach Miller is not that.
_________________ "??? How do you know he's awful? We've seen the guy play 2 regular season games." -SoulfishHawk "16 starts in 9 years is all you need to know." - Tsizzle "OMFG! LOL! Are you for real?"  -ivotuk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:01 pm |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am Posts: 7250
|
|
I anticipate another defense heavy year. We need to draft at least 2 defensive lineman, maybe 3. Drafting safety help and competition at CB would be advisable- we saw first hand how valuable depth at CB was this last season, and at the minimum we'll have to replace Trufant on the roster. Also need more fast linebackers.
The offense can be improved and I expect them to take advantage of a deep WR/TE draft class. They will probably add a backup QB. Whether people like it or not, I think we are set at OL. Basically, our offense is set, and our defense is under construction. It might take many more years before our defense is finally where Pete wants it to be- because some of the players he still needs to complete it are very hard to acquire.
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
General Manager
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:07 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:04 pm Posts: 1456
|
|
There not good enough at WR and they have no depth there either.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 9:21 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am Posts: 6400
|
|
Pass rush is the #1 need. No question. Carroll's already made that clear.
Secondary need for me is either a big target for Wilson or a WILL.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
seahawks875
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 11:29 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:14 am Posts: 207
|
|
I think it will be : 1. DT 2. WR/TE 3. DE 4. OLB
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
General Manager
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:42 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 11:04 pm Posts: 1456
|
theENGLISHseahawk wrote: Pass rush is the #1 need. No question. Carroll's already made that clear.
Secondary need for me is either a big target for Wilson or a WILL. Pass rush ok who did you have in mind. I agree it's a need but who can that get that's really warrants the 25th pick.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:17 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am Posts: 6400
|
|
I don't know. But it's not the secondary need to any area of the offense, even if you can't fill the hole with the #25 pick.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Jville
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 3:49 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:49 pm Posts: 1874
|
Rob Rang is identifying defensive tackle as the number one priority in this audio link >>>> http://www.sportsradiokjr.com/player/?s ... d=22841463I would add that I think the 2012 Seahawk defense ended up overloaded with too many specialists. I think they need to add a few more complete and well rounded players that can play all three downs ...... especially up front. NOTE: Football Outsiders statistics suggest the Seahawk defense was the most inconsistant .... up and down .... unit in the NFL. Their defensive statistical variance was 32an in the league.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 5:04 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am Posts: 7356
|
|
Until free agency has been addressed, guessing the order of importance is kind of pointless.
_________________ SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
lukerguy
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 5:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm Posts: 887
|
Scottemojo wrote: Until free agency has been addressed, guessing the order of importance is kind of pointless. This is true.
_________________  "We all we got, we all we need"
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Chawker
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:31 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:18 am Posts: 1238 Location: corner of 40th & plum
|
theENGLISHseahawk wrote: Pass rush is the #1 need. No question. Carroll's already made that clear.
Secondary need for me is either a big target for Wilson or a WILL. This is very true! And I've been thinking about this for awhile now and made a few adjustments with players. 1. #25 Sharrif Floyd DT 2. #56 Chris Faulk RT 3. #87 Da'Rick Rogers WR 4.#120 Chase Thomas LB 5.#131 Kwame Geathers DT 5.#151 David Bass DE 6.#184 Zach Sudfeld TE 7.#216 Price CB,Wagner OL,Buckner WR
_________________ Joplo Bartu needs to be signed. PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:29 pm |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm Posts: 4877
|
lukerguy wrote: Scottemojo wrote: Until free agency has been addressed, guessing the order of importance is kind of pointless. This is true. Not at all. Pass rush whether we pick up someone on FA is still a major need for this team. We have no pass rush right now and with Clemons and Branch unavailable at the moment, it's going to take multiple players to fill that need. Anyway, that's what a forum is for, speculatin' and opinionatin' 
_________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: This years draft Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 6:01 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am Posts: 6400
|
Chawker wrote: theENGLISHseahawk wrote: Pass rush is the #1 need. No question. Carroll's already made that clear.
Secondary need for me is either a big target for Wilson or a WILL. This is very true! And I've been thinking about this for awhile now and made a few adjustments with players. 1. #25 Sharrif Floyd DT 2. #56 Chris Faulk RT 3. #87 Da'Rick Rogers WR 4.#120 Chase Thomas LB 5.#131 Kwame Geathers DT 5.#151 David Bass DE 6.#184 Zach Sudfeld TE 7.#216 Price CB,Wagner OL,Buckner WR Floyd will be a top-ten pick. There's almost no chance he falls to #25. I'm not keen on the second pick either - a second round right tackle? Breno doesn't need replacing.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: Dismas and 21 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |