| Author |
Message |
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year  Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 2750
|
|
Well the GM did come in and completely overhauled that roster. I think it was 26 of the 53 man roster were all new players he brought in, so it's not much of a robbery. They hit on some guys besides Luck, of course...that shouldn't even count. But TY Hilton, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen, Brazill, Sowell, Ballard all contributed. And then of course, bringing in Pagano.
I think a couple years down the road and you look back at each respective bodies of work, Schneider will clearly be the winner, though...probably even the Exec of the Decade if such a thing existed.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Hawkstorian
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:14 pm |
|
| * NET Staff * |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:19 am
Posts: 2157
Location: Spokane
|
|
I have no indignation for subjective awards. It's nice to win a few, but really it means very little.
_________________
This post is intended for entertainment purposes only.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HansGruber
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:17 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:39 pm
Posts: 555
|
|
Yeah this is odd. I've heard some decent arguments for Elway and the guy in Miami, but Indy? It's probably because they started 20 something rookies. But I still don't see how they did better than Seattle.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:44 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15419
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
Congratulations to the Colts GM for having the guts to make the most obvious move in the last 20 years of football.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:57 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7318
|
|
Lets be honest here. We want John to win as much for the last three years as the last one year. But the Colts did win 11 games with a rookie and while switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Not bad at all. Neither Schneider or Grigson is a bad choice.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
seahawks875
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:05 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:14 am
Posts: 206
|
|
What you guys are saying:
The Seahawks are the best
All other teams suck
Both Schneider and Grigson did really good jobs, but he still put enough talent on a 2-14 team to take them to the playoffs. The Seahawks had a lot more talent this year so Schneider didn't do as much this year, Grigson should have won with Schneider as a close second
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:05 pm |
|
| * Navy Badass * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16249
Location: Bothell
|
Scottemojo wrote: Lets be honest here. We want John to win as much for the last three years as the last one year. But the Colts did win 11 games with a rookie and while switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Not bad at all. Neither Schneider or Grigson is a bad choice. I know, right? The only way Schneider should have been in contention at all is if he also went 11-5 with a rookie quarterback. And if Schneider had somehow lucked out in the draft with top OROY and DROY candidates, he just might have pulled it off. Might have taken at least one more playoff win than teams like Indy and Denver, though. _________________ I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:12 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7318
|
Seahawk Sailor wrote: Scottemojo wrote: Lets be honest here. We want John to win as much for the last three years as the last one year. But the Colts did win 11 games with a rookie and while switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Not bad at all. Neither Schneider or Grigson is a bad choice. I know, right? The only way Schneider should have been in contention at all is if he also went 11-5 with a rookie quarterback. And if Schneider had somehow lucked out in the draft with top OROY and DROY candidates, he just might have pulled it off. Might have taken at least one more playoff win than teams like Indy and Denver, though. That award is voted on before the playoffs. And like I said, the Colts did switch defense schemes this year. Our D was in pretty good shape to begin the year. I would love it if Schneider won, but he didn't. However, Schneider is getting a Bill Belichick reputation for personnel inside the league. I heard Amani Toomer say that all new GMs would be smart to just figure out who John Schneider likes instead of scouting players. Where our GM used to lose picks moving around in the draft targeting boy scouts, this guy accumulates picks.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
XxXdragonXxX
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:34 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:40 am
Posts: 906
Location: Enumclaw, WA
|
|
Eh, this doesn't bother me to much. Most of this team was built in 2010-11. Wilson and Wagner were great picks and really put us over the top, but the Colts were completely overhauled, much like Schneider did here in 2010. Luck was clearly the main reason for the Colts turnaround (that and their cakewalk schedule,) but still, going from 2-14 to 11-5 while completely overhauling the roster is impressive.
_________________ 
Last edited by XxXdragonXxX on Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 6156
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
|
Definitely agree that Schneider was more deserving, but people need to quit pretending that all Grigson did was draft Luck. Grigson was deserving, definitely.
_________________  Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Axx
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:39 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm
Posts: 733
|
|
Wasn't their schedule ranked like #32 in terms of difficulty?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Battle #83
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:53 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:42 pm
Posts: 199
Location: Rival Country
|
|
Didn't their GM get like 50% new players on the roster?
_________________  sig by Ramster
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BirdsCommaAngry
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:55 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:25 pm
Posts: 230
|
|
These kinds of accolades usually precede a fall off in performance for executives in other businesses. I don't know if that happens in the NFL but at least we don't have to find out the hard way. Being the best is better than being named the best.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
misfit
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:00 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 266
|
|
If I'm reading this right, isn't this the Sporting News exec of the year, and not the official AP award?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 665
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
misfit wrote: If I'm reading this right, isn't this the Sporting News exec of the year, and not the official AP award? I think you're right, actually. Looking into it...
_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 665
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
|
After a couple google searches, it appears there is no AP award for Exec of the Year. So maybe this is as official as it gets? I have no idea.
_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 636
|
|
AP doesn't name an Executive of the Year. The Sporting News award is considered the premiere one for the category.
I just saw the voting breakdown:
Ryan Grigson - Indianapolis - 9
John Elway - Denver - 8
John Schnieder - Seattle - 3
Bruce Allen - Washington - 2
Rick Smith- Houston - 2
WOW. That. Is. Ridiculous.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 665
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
DavidSeven wrote: AP doesn't name an Executive of the Year. The Sporting News award is considered the premiere one for the category.
I just saw the voting breakdown:
Ryan Grigson - Indianapolis - 9
John Elway - Denver - 8
John Schnieder - Seattle - 3
Bruce Allen - Washington - 2
Rick Smith- Houston - 2
WOW. That. Is. Ridiculous. 
_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic
My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BirdsCommaAngry
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:25 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:25 pm
Posts: 230
|
|
Wow, they really missed their marks.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
joeshaney
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:12 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:10 pm
Posts: 201
|
-The Glove- wrote: Well the GM did come in and completely overhauled that roster. I think it was 26 of the 53 man roster were all new players he brought in, so it's not much of a robbery. They hit on some guys besides Luck, of course...that shouldn't even count. But TY Hilton, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen, Brazill, Sowell, Ballard all contributed. And then of course, bringing in Pagano.
I think a couple years down the road and you look back at each respective bodies of work, Schneider will clearly be the winner, though...probably even the Exec of the Decade if such a thing existed. Didn't john do this same thing two years in a row? I guess we will see soon enough who builds a better club.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: 2ndRowSista, bestfightstory, Bigpumpkin, BlueTalons, dbmack, drdiags, Google [Bot], Hawken-Dazs, hawxfreak, jman316, jp25591, Landhawk1, LawHawk, Leep, McGruff, Natethegreat, oldhawkfan, SacHawk2.0, Shadyhawk182, Skeeve, Smoke, SmokinHawk, Spounge84, therealjohncarlson, Throwdown, Timmahawk, tomahawk, Wenhawk and 136 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
