| Author |
Message |
|
Fox0r
|
Post subject: John Schneider not named top executive of the year  Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:25 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:30 pm
Posts: 1872
Location: Lynnwood, WA
|
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcwest/post/_/ ... d-top-execQuote: Neither prevailed in voting among peers for the Sporting News' award honoring the top executive for the 2012 season. That distinction went to Indianapolis Colts GM Ryan Grigson, who turned over most of the team's roster and went 11-5 with a rookie quarterback. I can't say I agree with this. But it is what it is. More fuel for this team's fire.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
Yakima Hawkster
|
Post subject: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:26 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 409
Location: Yakima
|
|
Colts GM wins.
_________________
Russell Wilson and Chris Hansen. My man crushes.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Yakima Hawkster
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:27 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 409
Location: Yakima
|
|
Absurd. How hard is it to say "Hey, let's draft Andrew Luck."?
_________________
Russell Wilson and Chris Hansen. My man crushes.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Greenhell
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:29 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 2643
|
|
Yeah well we see how that plays out in a few seasons as we're working towards a second title and Luck and CO float at the bottom of the toilet.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Fox0r
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:29 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:30 pm
Posts: 1872
Location: Lynnwood, WA
|
Yakima Hawkster wrote: Absurd. How hard is it to say "Hey, let's draft Andrew Luck."? The other thing that boggles my mind is that people equate the 11-5 record to Andrew Luck's greatness, but discount Curtis Painter's ineptitude.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SouthSoundHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:29 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am
Posts: 2050
|
|
Well, that team was absolutely terrible last year...simply abysmal.
Don't know enough about their draft to make any judgements and not play my homer card.
Was this all based on picking Luck at number 1 like everyone figured would happen? If that's the case then I want a piece of that award, cause I made that call too.
_________________ Go Hawks.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:30 pm |
|
| * NET Eeyore * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 10485
Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
Booooooooooooo!!!!!!
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Yakima Hawkster
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:33 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 409
Location: Yakima
|
SouthSoundHawk wrote: Well, that team was absolutely terrible last year...simply abysmal.
Don't know enough about their draft to make any judgements and not play my homer card.
Was this all based on picking Luck at number 1 like everyone figured would happen? If that's the case then I want a piece of that award, cause I made that call too. How could it NOT be because of that?
_________________
Russell Wilson and Chris Hansen. My man crushes.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Fox0r
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:33 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:30 pm
Posts: 1872
Location: Lynnwood, WA
|
|
Can an admin drop my thread and merge it with this one when they have a chance?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:36 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 11207
|
I think we just got a hint as to who will win OROY.  _________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:37 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
Posts: 12379
Location: Anchorage, AK
|
MontanaHawk05 wrote: I think we just got a hint as to who will win OROY. RGIII? _________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
IBleedBlueAndGreen
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:37 pm |
|
| * NET Injury Guru * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 10:56 am
Posts: 1520
Location: Poulsbo, WA
|
|
There were a lot of good choices this season. Colts GM, Elway in Denver, Schneider. Don't think we can get too upset about this one.
_________________  "There is no delay of game. We did not let the team know we were scratching our balls"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Yakima Hawkster
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:39 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 409
Location: Yakima
|
|
Sorry Blueandgreen I disagree. ROY decision could rightfully favor any one of the three QB's. But executive? No way. Schneider should've won hands down.
_________________
Russell Wilson and Chris Hansen. My man crushes.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
12th_Bob
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:42 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:56 pm
Posts: 1745
|
|
B.S., Schneider should have won this one, no doubt.
Well, just file it under NFL Seattle slights # 4,000,000,006.
_________________
NFL, all your Owlz are belong to us!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 1394
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
_________________ Tru2RedNGold25 wrote: Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:45 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 1394
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
kidhawk wrote: MontanaHawk05 wrote: I think we just got a hint as to who will win OROY. RGIII? Doug Martin? _________________ Tru2RedNGold25 wrote: Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:47 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 3092
|
|
Colts get rewarded for shamelessly tanking 2011 yet again. They weren't a true 2-14 team last year. The guy they started at QB wasn't even in the damn league in 2012. Advanced metrics show they were pretty bad team this year, too. Wins/losses don't tell the story here. Total sham.
Last edited by DavidSeven on Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
chris98251
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:48 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 9164
Location: Renton Wa.
|
|
Lets look at this, consensus top pre draft QB and they sucked to get him by getting the first pick, head scratcher I'm sure. Schnieder grabs what could be the OROY in Wilson, DROY in Wagner and rookie with most sacks in Irvin yet doesn't get it.
_________________  To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me... .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , Idiot, member of the 38 club.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 1394
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
|
I honestly thought this was the one we had in the bag. Don't see what's so impressive about drafting Andrew Luck.
_________________ Tru2RedNGold25 wrote: Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:54 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 1394
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
|
This just in from Doug Baldwin via Twitter:
"How John Schneider didn’t win executive of the year doesn’t exactly make sense to me."
Pretty much sums it up for me.
_________________ Tru2RedNGold25 wrote: Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
|
|
| |
|
|
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 6363
|
|
Well the GM did come in and completely overhauled that roster. I think it was 26 of the 53 man roster were all new players he brought in, so it's not much of a robbery. They hit on some guys besides Luck, of course...that shouldn't even count. But TY Hilton, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen, Brazill, Sowell, Ballard all contributed. And then of course, bringing in Pagano.
I think a couple years down the road and you look back at each respective bodies of work, Schneider will clearly be the winner, though...probably even the Exec of the Decade if such a thing existed.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawkstorian
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:14 pm |
|
| * NET Staff * |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:19 am
Posts: 2839
Location: Spokane
|
|
I have no indignation for subjective awards. It's nice to win a few, but really it means very little.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HansGruber
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:17 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:39 pm
Posts: 1594
|
|
Yeah this is odd. I've heard some decent arguments for Elway and the guy in Miami, but Indy? It's probably because they started 20 something rookies. But I still don't see how they did better than Seattle.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:44 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 18457
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
Congratulations to the Colts GM for having the guts to make the most obvious move in the last 20 years of football.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 6:57 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
|
|
Lets be honest here. We want John to win as much for the last three years as the last one year. But the Colts did win 11 games with a rookie and while switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Not bad at all. Neither Schneider or Grigson is a bad choice.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
seahawks875
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:05 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:14 am
Posts: 238
|
|
What you guys are saying:
The Seahawks are the best
All other teams suck
Both Schneider and Grigson did really good jobs, but he still put enough talent on a 2-14 team to take them to the playoffs. The Seahawks had a lot more talent this year so Schneider didn't do as much this year, Grigson should have won with Schneider as a close second
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:05 pm |
|
| * Natural Rubbing Action * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 17582
Location: The beautiful PNW
|
Scottemojo wrote: Lets be honest here. We want John to win as much for the last three years as the last one year. But the Colts did win 11 games with a rookie and while switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Not bad at all. Neither Schneider or Grigson is a bad choice. I know, right? The only way Schneider should have been in contention at all is if he also went 11-5 with a rookie quarterback. And if Schneider had somehow lucked out in the draft with top OROY and DROY candidates, he just might have pulled it off. Might have taken at least one more playoff win than teams like Indy and Denver, though.
_________________
World Champion Seattle Seahawks football. It's an addiction, and there is no cure.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:12 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 10044
|
Seahawk Sailor wrote: Scottemojo wrote: Lets be honest here. We want John to win as much for the last three years as the last one year. But the Colts did win 11 games with a rookie and while switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Not bad at all. Neither Schneider or Grigson is a bad choice. I know, right? The only way Schneider should have been in contention at all is if he also went 11-5 with a rookie quarterback. And if Schneider had somehow lucked out in the draft with top OROY and DROY candidates, he just might have pulled it off. Might have taken at least one more playoff win than teams like Indy and Denver, though. That award is voted on before the playoffs. And like I said, the Colts did switch defense schemes this year. Our D was in pretty good shape to begin the year. I would love it if Schneider won, but he didn't. However, Schneider is getting a Bill Belichick reputation for personnel inside the league. I heard Amani Toomer say that all new GMs would be smart to just figure out who John Schneider likes instead of scouting players. Where our GM used to lose picks moving around in the draft targeting boy scouts, this guy accumulates picks.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
XxXdragonXxX
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 7:34 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:40 am
Posts: 953
Location: Enumclaw, WA
|
|
Eh, this doesn't bother me to much. Most of this team was built in 2010-11. Wilson and Wagner were great picks and really put us over the top, but the Colts were completely overhauled, much like Schneider did here in 2010. Luck was clearly the main reason for the Colts turnaround (that and their cakewalk schedule,) but still, going from 2-14 to 11-5 while completely overhauling the roster is impressive.
_________________ 
Last edited by XxXdragonXxX on Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 7707
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
|
Definitely agree that Schneider was more deserving, but people need to quit pretending that all Grigson did was draft Luck. Grigson was deserving, definitely.
_________________  Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Axx
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:39 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm
Posts: 2539
|
|
Wasn't their schedule ranked like #32 in terms of difficulty?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Battle #83
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:53 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:42 pm
Posts: 227
Location: Rival Country
|
|
Didn't their GM get like 50% new players on the roster?
_________________  sig by Ramster
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BirdsCommaAngry
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:55 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:25 pm
Posts: 612
|
|
These kinds of accolades usually precede a fall off in performance for executives in other businesses. I don't know if that happens in the NFL but at least we don't have to find out the hard way. Being the best is better than being named the best.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
misfit
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:00 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 327
|
|
If I'm reading this right, isn't this the Sporting News exec of the year, and not the official AP award?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 1394
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
misfit wrote: If I'm reading this right, isn't this the Sporting News exec of the year, and not the official AP award? I think you're right, actually. Looking into it... _________________ Tru2RedNGold25 wrote: Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 1394
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
|
After a couple google searches, it appears there is no AP award for Exec of the Year. So maybe this is as official as it gets? I have no idea.
_________________ Tru2RedNGold25 wrote: Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 3092
|
|
AP doesn't name an Executive of the Year. The Sporting News award is considered the premiere one for the category.
I just saw the voting breakdown:
Ryan Grigson - Indianapolis - 9
John Elway - Denver - 8
John Schnieder - Seattle - 3
Bruce Allen - Washington - 2
Rick Smith- Houston - 2
WOW. That. Is. Ridiculous.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
razgriz737
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 1394
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
|
DavidSeven wrote: AP doesn't name an Executive of the Year. The Sporting News award is considered the premiere one for the category.
I just saw the voting breakdown:
Ryan Grigson - Indianapolis - 9
John Elway - Denver - 8
John Schnieder - Seattle - 3
Bruce Allen - Washington - 2
Rick Smith- Houston - 2
WOW. That. Is. Ridiculous.  _________________ Tru2RedNGold25 wrote: Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BirdsCommaAngry
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:25 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:25 pm
Posts: 612
|
|
Wow, they really missed their marks.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
joeshaney
|
Post subject: Re: Travesty alert: Schneider DOESNT win exec of year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:12 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:10 pm
Posts: 290
|
-The Glove- wrote: Well the GM did come in and completely overhauled that roster. I think it was 26 of the 53 man roster were all new players he brought in, so it's not much of a robbery. They hit on some guys besides Luck, of course...that shouldn't even count. But TY Hilton, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen, Brazill, Sowell, Ballard all contributed. And then of course, bringing in Pagano.
I think a couple years down the road and you look back at each respective bodies of work, Schneider will clearly be the winner, though...probably even the Exec of the Decade if such a thing existed. Didn't john do this same thing two years in a row? I guess we will see soon enough who builds a better club.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:22 pm |
|
| *NET FCC Liaison* |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 22651
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
|
More ignorance. Newsflash, for sure.
_________________
Sam Bradford is a game changer.
*He can change a win into a loss.
*He can change a loss into a win by getting injured.
*RedAlice is right.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Screaming Seahawk
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:16 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 1:40 am
Posts: 2
|
Scottemojo wrote: Lets be honest here. We want John to win as much for the last three years as the last one year. But the Colts did win 11 games with a rookie and while switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Not bad at all. Neither Schneider or Grigson is a bad choice. Kind of rings hollow for me. This snub reminds me of what the Academy Awards does all the time, anointing a flavor of the month film over an obvious all time classic. The Colts had the underlying indicators of a sub .500 team. It is possible, not likely but possible, that Grigson may not even have a job 5 years from now while Schneider is very likely to be the consensus top GM in the league. It wouldn't be the first time this award has looked pretty stupid in retrospect.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
ensett
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:22 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 11:26 am
Posts: 1522
|
|
the colts had a MASSIVE roster turnover this past season. I don't remember the exact number but I think it was less than 50% of the roster was on the team last year.
_________________
----
|
|
| |
|
|
|
joeshaney
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:34 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:10 pm
Posts: 290
|
ensett wrote: the colts had a MASSIVE roster turnover this past season. I don't remember the exact number but I think it was less than 50% of the roster was on the team last year. Schneider had to overcome the same thing. The difference is that the Colts GM inherited 3 future hall of fame players and the top pick guaranteed to land the chosen one Andrew Luck. Schneider inherited a pile of turds too thick to flush. No teams over the last few drafts have done half as much as he has. He filled a crappy roster with oodles of probowlers and all-pros and didn't have to have any number one overall picks to do it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
RolandDeschain
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:35 am |
|
| *NET FCC Liaison* |
|
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 22651
Location: Kirkland, WA
|
Scottemojo wrote: Lets be honest here. We want John to win as much for the last three years as the last one year. But the Colts did win 11 games with a rookie and while switching from a 4-3 to a 3-4. Not bad at all. Neither Schneider or Grigson is a bad choice. If you want to be honest, also bring up the cupcake schedule the Colts had, and having the #1 overall pick which they only got because Curtis Painter's a worse QB than my cat. John Schneider, on the other hand, was so convinced of what Russell Wilson turned out to be, that he wanted to draft him in the 2nd round instead of the 3rd, and Papa Pete had to talk him down. Just like Elway signing Peyton, it's a move a brain-dead moron would have made, too. Well, even if the Colts didn't, they'd have been fine with RG3 and likely would have made him be more of a passer than the Redskins; but I digress.
_________________
Sam Bradford is a game changer.
*He can change a win into a loss.
*He can change a loss into a win by getting injured.
*RedAlice is right.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
-The Glove-
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:57 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 12:12 am
Posts: 6363
|
joeshaney wrote: -The Glove- wrote: Well the GM did come in and completely overhauled that roster. I think it was 26 of the 53 man roster were all new players he brought in, so it's not much of a robbery. They hit on some guys besides Luck, of course...that shouldn't even count. But TY Hilton, Coby Fleener, Dwayne Allen, Brazill, Sowell, Ballard all contributed. And then of course, bringing in Pagano.
I think a couple years down the road and you look back at each respective bodies of work, Schneider will clearly be the winner, though...probably even the Exec of the Decade if such a thing existed. Didn't john do this same thing two years in a row? I guess we will see soon enough who builds a better club. Pretty much
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 12:57 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am
Posts: 3092
|
|
All I hear Re: Luck's ROY candidacy is how he has NO DEFENSE, NO RUN GAME, NO OFFENSIVE WEAPONS, and HAS TO DO IT ALL ON HIS OWN. So, which is it? Did the golden boy carry a terribly assembled roster on his back or did their GM surround him with good-enough talent by replacing half the roster?
Can't have it both ways.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
lacenterhawk
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:03 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:55 am
Posts: 240
Location: La Center, Washington
|
DavidSeven wrote: All I hear Re: Luck's ROY candidacy is how he has NO DEFENSE, NO RUN GAME, NO OFFENSIVE WEAPONS, and HAS TO DO IT ALL ON HIS OWN. So, which is it? Did the golden boy carry a terribly assembled roster on his back or did their GM surround him with good-enough talent by replacing half the roster?
Can't have it both ways. WINNER!!!! 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
BirdsCommaAngry
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:33 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 6:25 pm
Posts: 612
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Greenhell
|
Post subject: Re: John Schneider not named top executive of the year Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:50 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:46 am
Posts: 2643
|
DavidSeven wrote: All I hear Re: Luck's ROY candidacy is how he has NO DEFENSE, NO RUN GAME, NO OFFENSIVE WEAPONS, and HAS TO DO IT ALL ON HIS OWN. So, which is it? Did the golden boy carry a terribly assembled roster on his back or did their GM surround him with good-enough talent by replacing half the roster?
Can't have it both ways. JACKPOT!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: AdsBot [Google], andrew24k, austinslater25, Basis4day, BigWig, Bill Assumpcao, Bloodrunsblue, ccla, checkdanews, Cinque52, ctrcat, dunceface, GFang, Gifted1, Google [Bot], Gridhawk, HAWKS2theBONE, HuskyHawk, IcedHawk, kodiakira, Largefarva, Lieutenant Dan, lobohawk, MagHawk, Milehighhawk, Missing_Clink, MontanaHawk05, MTHAWK, nsport, sam1313, seabowl, seahawk 17, tom sawyer, twisted_steel2, usmSEAhawk, valleyflyfisher, Yahoo [Bot], Zebulon Dak and 152 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
