| Author |
Message |
|
SDHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:17 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:06 pm Posts: 230
|
MontanaHawk05 wrote: SDHawk wrote: Sorry, still waiting for a response that makes sense. Comments like that are more likely to merely make people chuckle and put you onto their ignore list. Thanks for the heads up. I'm not here for attention. I'm here to discuss ways this team can make itself better. So, if looking at bargain deep threats is not something you feel could improve this team, please ignore me and move on.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SouthSoundHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:26 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am Posts: 670
|
You want to talk improving this team? http://walterfootball.com/draft2013WR.phpHere's a comprehensive list of WRs that could add something to this team, and are as much of a risk as a dude that's been sitting out for a year plus.
_________________ Go Hawks.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SDHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:34 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:06 pm Posts: 230
|
SouthSoundHawk wrote: You want to talk improving this team? http://walterfootball.com/draft2013WR.phpHere's a comprehensive list of WRs that could add something to this team, and are as much of a risk as a dude that's been sitting out for a year plus. Thanks, I prefer we focus on DT/OLB via the draft. I think there are enough option in FA for WRs... deepest FA pool in a while for receivers, no? Whereas if we use FA to address our needs at DT, we'll be looking to fork out tens of millions of dollars for an impact DT.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SeahawksFanForever
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm Posts: 1836
|
|
I would rather spend big money on the D-line in the free agency. We are already paying Zach and Sidney big contracts. I would focus on WR n TE position in the draft because it should be cheaper. There should be a few options available in top 3 rounds.
_________________ Richard Sherman to Skip Bayless: "I'm tired of your ignorant pollution!"
Follow me on twitter: @seahawks_fan12
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SDHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:47 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:06 pm Posts: 230
|
SeahawksFanForever wrote: I would rather spend big money on the D-line in the free agency. We are already paying Zach and Sidney big contracts. I would focus on WR n TE position in the draft because it should be cheaper. There should be a few options available in top 3 rounds. No one said anything about spending big money anywhere. I do think we will explore the FA market for the DL... But if we don't get someone like Desmond Bryant, I don't see why we couldn't leverage our draft picks plus Matt Flynn to try and get an impact DT in the draft like Sheldon Richardson and/or Kawann Short. Kawann Short Sheldon Richardson Brandon Mebane Bruce Irvin ^That would put alot of pressure on QBs Then we dont have to blow our budget and we can make smaller FA moves like Jared Cook, Johnny Knox and Tarvaris Jackson.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SouthSoundHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:51 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am Posts: 670
|
http://www.kffl.com/static/nfl/features ... =WR&y=2013Not sold on any of the available guys to be honest. Each one of these FAs can be replaced by a player in the draft. If anything the 'hawks should go after a beast TE to compliment Zach. Wilson seemed to like Zach as a reliable dump off guy, won't hurt to have two.
_________________ Go Hawks.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SDHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 3:04 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:06 pm Posts: 230
|
|
Thanks SouthSound. I should have prefaced everything by saying I want to explore the most cost-effective way to improve this team. It seems most everyone here is operating under the assumption that we will make a huge spashy move and leverage our cap space to the max this offseason. I just dont see that as being realistic. I don't see us signing Henry Melton or Mike Wallace. I think the most efficient use of our resources is to pursue impact DTs in the draft and to sign bargain FAs like Jared Cook, Johnny Knox and Tarvaris Jackson that can still make an impact but wont necessarily break our bank. I dont see many bargain DT/DE/OLBs in FA.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SeahawksFanForever
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 3:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm Posts: 1836
|
SDHawk wrote: SeahawksFanForever wrote: I would rather spend big money on the D-line in the free agency. We are already paying Zach and Sidney big contracts. I would focus on WR n TE position in the draft because it should be cheaper. There should be a few options available in top 3 rounds. No one said anything about spending big money anywhere. I do think we will explore the FA market for the DL... But if we don't get someone like Desmond Bryant, I don't see why we couldn't leverage our draft picks plus Matt Flynn to try and get an impact DT in the draft like Sheldon Richardson and/or Kawann Short. Kawann Short Sheldon Richardson Brandon Mebane Bruce Irvin ^That would put alot of pressure on QBs Then we dont have to blow our budget and we can make smaller FA moves like Jared Cook, Johnny Knox and Tarvaris Jackson. Kawann Short and Sheldon Richardson both? I don't see that as a possibility. And, Jared Cook won't be cheap in my opinion. A lot of the 4-3 teams are switching to 3-4 this year. There might be some solid under the radar pass rushers available. I would rather focus on that, Randy Starks, Henry Melton, etc in the free agency and draft WR Hopkins in the first round.
_________________ Richard Sherman to Skip Bayless: "I'm tired of your ignorant pollution!"
Follow me on twitter: @seahawks_fan12
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SDHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 3:26 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:06 pm Posts: 230
|
SeahawksFanForever wrote: SDHawk wrote: SeahawksFanForever wrote: I would rather spend big money on the D-line in the free agency. We are already paying Zach and Sidney big contracts. I would focus on WR n TE position in the draft because it should be cheaper. There should be a few options available in top 3 rounds. No one said anything about spending big money anywhere. I do think we will explore the FA market for the DL... But if we don't get someone like Desmond Bryant, I don't see why we couldn't leverage our draft picks plus Matt Flynn to try and get an impact DT in the draft like Sheldon Richardson and/or Kawann Short. Kawann Short Sheldon Richardson Brandon Mebane Bruce Irvin ^That would put alot of pressure on QBs Then we dont have to blow our budget and we can make smaller FA moves like Jared Cook, Johnny Knox and Tarvaris Jackson. Kawann Short and Sheldon Richardson both? I don't see that as a possibility. And, Jared Cook won't be cheap in my opinion. A lot of the 4-3 teams are switching to 3-4 this year. There might be some solid under the radar pass rushers available. I would rather focus on that, Randy Starks, Henry Melton, etc in the free agency and draft WR Hopkins in the first round. All speculation but I think we can net a 1st rounder if we trade Flynn our 2nd and 5th to a team like the Chiefs or Jaguars. 1. Sheldon Richardson, 3 tech 1. Kawann Short, 5 tech or 1 tech 3. Zaviar Gooden, OLB 4. Jordan Hill, 3 tech 5. Ricky Wagner, OT/G 6. Nathan Williams, DE/OLB sign Jared Cook, Johnny Knox, Tarvaris Jackson, LeRoy Hill, Alan Branch QB: Russell Wilson | Tarvaris Jackson** WR: Sidney Rice | Stephen Williams WR: Golden Tate | Johnny Knox** WR: Doug Balwin | Jermaine Kearse RB: Marshawn Lynch | Robert Turbin | Leon Washington FB: Mike Rob TE: Zach Miller | Jared Cook** LT: Russell Okung | Ricky Wagner* LG: James Carpenter | Paul McQuistan C: Max Unger | Lemuel Jeanpierre RG: JR Sweezy | John Moffitt LG: Breno Giacomini | Ricky Wagner* ========= LDE: Kawann Short* | Red Bryant | Greg Scruggs LDT: Sheldon Richardson* | Jordan Hill* | Alan Branch** RDT: Brandon Mebane | Kawann Short* RDE: Bruce Irvin | Nathan Williams* | Chris Clemons WLB: Zaviar Gooden* | LeRoy Hill** | Malcolm Smith ILB: Bobby Wagner RLB: KJ Wright | Mike Morgan RCB: Richard Sherman | Byron Maxwell SS: Kam Chancellor | Winston Guy FS: Earl Thomas | Chris Maragos LCB: Brandon Browner | Jeremy Lane | DeShawn Shead ================ We would have addressed our need for pass rushing and explosiveness on offense (Marshawn, Tate, Knox and Jared Cook are all legit 4.4 burners) without breaking the bank.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SeahawksFanForever
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 3:59 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm Posts: 1836
|
|
So you are focusing mostly on the defense in the draft (Which is cool) and not getting RW much help in the draft?
Jared Cook would be nice but other than that, Johnny Knox is your guy? That's it? I am not sure if I agree with that.
_________________ Richard Sherman to Skip Bayless: "I'm tired of your ignorant pollution!"
Follow me on twitter: @seahawks_fan12
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SDHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 4:05 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:06 pm Posts: 230
|
SeahawksFanForever wrote: So you are focusing mostly on the defense in the draft (Which is cool) and not getting RW much help in the draft?
Jared Cook would be nice but other than that, Johnny Knox is your guy? That's it? I am not sure if I agree with that. RW has this ability to motivate others to overachieve. I think even marginally talented receivers would look great next to Wilson. In my mind, I think he only needs that situational deep threat or maybe a faster TE to turn a profit on those scrambles he uses to extend plays. I dont envision us using many 3 wide sets so... long answer short, yeah Im ok with Jared Cook and Johnny Knox as "my guy".
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kobebryant
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:38 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 1:45 pm Posts: 873
|
|
Knox hasn't played since the injury. I wouldn't be suprised if he doesn't play again, he would still need to be medically cleared. I hope for his sake he doesn't come back unless there is little risk related to the injury. Very scary. I can't think of anyone who has suffered and back/spinal injury of that extent and made it back to prior form.
No way do the Hawks address their WR depth with the only move being the addition of a player that may or may not be able to play football again. This front office is better than this.
Go young, go healthy. I'd be choked if they passed on guys like Hopkins,Wheaton,Patterson or Woods because they thought the addition of Knox was sufficient.
Last edited by kobebryant on Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
getnasty
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 8:57 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:22 pm Posts: 527
|
|
Didn't like Knox before the injury, and i really don't like him now. The draft is really deep at WR, we could pick someone in the 3rd round(Woods,Wheaton,Swope, and Patton) with way more upside then Knox.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Tical21
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:06 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:37 pm Posts: 493
|
|
Meh. No chance he makes our top-3. I'd rather have take on a project with more upside. Knox looked decent for a minute, and then when pushed into a larger role, found he was incredibly limited. Doesn't run good enough routes to get open, can't get off jams, doesn't have very good hands, doesn't have ball skills down the field. Worth a flyer, sure, but wouldn't expect him to make the team.
_________________ Ummm, no sig to see here, especially not a sig referring to Tarvaris Jackson in any way.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Bipolar
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 11:16 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 5:58 pm Posts: 724 Location: Minneapolis, MN (moving to Seattle in March 2013)
|
|
to be completely honest, I'd much rather prefer a rookie WR taken in first two rounds over healthy Knox as well, HOWEVER, PC/JS should still evaluate the guy, bring him to training camp and check him out. weirder things have happened.
_________________ Cheesehead Seahawk Extraordinaire
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 11:42 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm Posts: 1390
|
SeahawksFanForever wrote: I would rather spend big money on the D-line in the free agency. We are already paying Zach and Sidney big contracts. I would focus on WR n TE position in the draft because it should be cheaper. There should be a few options available in top 3 rounds. How does it matter on which position we spend the money if the total cap hit is the same or less one way? You go after those in FA that you think you can't get in the draft / you can get in the draft but at a better value in FA or those that while available in the draft you don't plan on using your picks on. If there are good WRs in FA and lots of them so you think you can get them cheap and there are good pass rushers in the draft then that is how you do it. Doesn't matter what we are spending on Rice and Zach
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 11:55 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am Posts: 6184 Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
I have yet to read anything that suggests that Knox is anywhere close to resuming his football career or even being ABLE to. From an article posted this past December: Quote: Srdjan Mirkovic, the Bears' spine consultant and an orthopedic surgeon on staff at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, performed a one-level vertebral fusion on Knox on Dec. 19. The initial outlook was four to six months of a recovery just to perform normal activities, and even longer before Knox could return to football.
That optimism changed when more structural damage was discovered during the surgery. Knox's back was unstable, and there were more torn ligaments than anticipated. The nerve damage couldn't be assessed until after the surgery, and Knox had to wear a back brace for a while after the procedure.
Considering how taxing the recovery process has been on him, Knox declined to revisit the incident when approached this week. He is on the physically-unable-to-perform list for the remainder of the season, although he is around the team daily.
_________________ Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
FortWorthSeahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 1:09 pm |
|
| USAF BadAss |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 5:24 am Posts: 953 Location: Charlottesville, VA
|
volsunghawk wrote: I have yet to read anything that suggests that Knox is anywhere close to resuming his football career or even being ABLE to. From an article posted this past December: Quote: Srdjan Mirkovic, the Bears' spine consultant and an orthopedic surgeon on staff at Northwestern Memorial Hospital, performed a one-level vertebral fusion on Knox on Dec. 19. The initial outlook was four to six months of a recovery just to perform normal activities, and even longer before Knox could return to football.
That optimism changed when more structural damage was discovered during the surgery. Knox's back was unstable, and there were more torn ligaments than anticipated. The nerve damage couldn't be assessed until after the surgery, and Knox had to wear a back brace for a while after the procedure.
Considering how taxing the recovery process has been on him, Knox declined to revisit the incident when approached this week. He is on the physically-unable-to-perform list for the remainder of the season, although he is around the team daily. Exactly
_________________ Kam Chancellor: The Chancellor of Defense Bruce Irvin: BruceMode Tharold Simon: Humble Thug
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 2:32 pm |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm Posts: 16458 Location: SoCal
|
|
We would be better off with Johnny Knoxville.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
jman316
|
Post subject: Re: Johnny Knox Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2013 5:40 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 10:46 am Posts: 320 Location: Kingston, WA
|
|
Welcome to Jackass.
_________________ Regale us with one of your crazy tall tales.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |