Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 2:26 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 8167
Location: Antioch, CA
This guy might turn out to be nothing, but it makes me laugh out loud when people on this board brush off a signing without giving our FO the benefit of the doubt.

Seriously, how many times does this FO have to take a "nobody" player and turn them into a solid contributor before you realize that they can find some good players from the bargain bin? Even players that no other team wants?

I'll reserve judgment until after training camp.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 2:29 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:46 pm
Posts: 295
I would also like to see us pick up Ramses Barden in free agency. He has been with the Giants out of Cal Poly. Similar measurements and strong hands.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:07 pm 
* Navy Badass *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16257
Location: Bothell
Scottemojo wrote:
Seahawk Sailor wrote:
For comparison, which player would you rather us sign?

Player A: 71 rec, 798 yards, 4 TDs
Player B: 85 rec, 1,064 yards, 13 TDs

Well, if Player B
I would rather have Fitz over Decker. Evan Moore was as big as Jimmy Graham, bit I would rather have the one who can clap without missing.

This Williams dude didn't get cut because Ryan Lindley sucks. Just like Evan Moore had one catch even though Wilson is awesome. This notion that great QBs can make d listers into good receivers has got to go.


You're right of course, but I'd also mention that the snapshot comparison I made would also indicate that a crappy quarterback can make a receiver look a whole lot worse than they really are. We know Fitz is an absolute beast of a receiver, but put up very forgettable, pedestrian numbers when paired with a bunch of no-name quarterbacks. Paired with Peyton Manning, that match-up could eclipse Stafford-to-Megatron or Montana-to-Rice.

_________________
I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:14 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 677
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
HawkFan72 wrote:
This guy might turn out to be nothing, but it makes me laugh out loud when people on this board brush off a signing without giving our FO the benefit of the doubt.

Seriously, how many times does this FO have to take a "nobody" player and turn them into a solid contributor before you realize that they can find some good players from the bargain bin? Even players that no other team wants?

I'll reserve judgment until after training camp.

:13:

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:57 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:48 pm
Posts: 2086
HawkFan72 wrote:
This guy might turn out to be nothing, but it makes me laugh out loud when people on this board brush off a signing without giving our FO the benefit of the doubt.

Seriously, how many times does this FO have to take a "nobody" player and turn them into a solid contributor before you realize that they can find some good players from the bargain bin? Even players that no other team wants?

I'll reserve judgment until after training camp.

+1
I really have my doubts that there are many talent evaluators around here that can boast a better record for finding players that can light it up than Schneider or Carroll.
Could he turn out to be a bust?, absolutely, but he could turn out to be damned good player as well.
John Schneider just likes to Dig A Little Deeper for that diamond.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:09 pm 
* Navy Badass *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am
Posts: 16257
Location: Bothell
I heard Mel Kiper thought this was one of the dumbest moves he's ever seen.

_________________
I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 5:42 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 942
After reading that article, I'm actually pretty enthused, if not excited, about this pickup. If you are just replying, and didn't even read what was in the OP, you should read it:

In December, Williams injured his right Achilles’ tendon and was cut by the Cardinals, and John Schneider recently signed him to a two-year $1.2 million futures contract worth $555,000 in 2013 and $645,000 in 2014. “We got him,” Schneider was recently quoted as saying.

“It’s insane. It’s an absolute crime,” Cardinal’s Bertrand Berry said back in 2010 when asked how NFL teams failed to draft Williams. In the same 2010 interview, Larry Fitzgerald said that Williams may eventually replace him as the #1 receiver on the Cardinal offense. ”That’s a good thing to hear coming from a guy like that (Fitzgerald),” Williams said. “I’m learning from him every day, how to pick his brain and run routes like him and the different techniques he uses to get open.” Derek Anderson compared Williams to Josh Cribbs of the Cleveland Browns. ”Josh was one of those guys,” Anderson said. “He’s not a great receiver, but he’s a great athlete and probably one of the best football players I’ve ever been around.”


I know this doesn't mean much, and he was an undrafted receiver to begin with.... but this is promising. And we all know the terrible situation in Arizona- combined with John and Pete's knack for finding talent, we could have a case for something here. I'm not counting on it, but I am optimistic.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 6:03 pm 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:54 am
Posts: 340
Location: Orlando, FL
Tech Worlds wrote:
What happened too Rocardo Locette?

Dont get too excited about players that have on the surface seam like good players but just dont have the pedigree or track record to make it in the NFL.

My neighbor is 6'5", big dude, looks like he can run but I am not under any misconceptions that he could get the job done at the NFL level.

But, there's a world of difference between your neighbor (who I take is NOT a football player) and Stephen Williams - who IS an NFL football player with a track record. Isn't the average career just something like 4 years? He's halfway there man. He's been doing it (without a good QB.) I don't see anyone saying Williams is a lock or being overly excited. I think this signing is noteworthy without overstating it. Of course he has to prove himself valuable enough to make the roster. That will most definitely be determined. I'll say this about Williams, though. If JS is truely excited about him... I trust he's looking at the player's college body of work as well as the same consideration everyone squawks about with Larry Fitzgerald - that he would be much more productive with a QB that could get him the ball. He has been stuck on the same WR corps :Dunno: Stephen Williams is worth a look to see if there is more there with a capable QB to get him the ball. There was a buzz about this guy coming out of college into the draft. Tough to judge a guy on just 2 years in Arizona when there was plenty of things wrong about that offense. Williams has impressed at both the college and (though more limited) NFL level already.

Thanks to the original poster. I enjoyed reading it and can appreciate your cautious excitement when a player like this with potential gets signed for a look. We'll see if SW works out or if JS/PC find even better talent.

_________________
Team of the Century!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:04 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:08 pm
Posts: 1733
Location: Seattle
Aren't you concerned about all the bandwagon fans after Williams dominates SportsCenter every week?

_________________
"Check out my 2012 NFL Draft Grades. I just gave the worst grade ever to Seattle." - WalterFootball.com


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:24 pm 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7229
Scottemojo wrote:
I think you are making a bigger deal out a guy the Cardinals cut December 14 than is really warranted.


If you haven't, you should read the article he wrote. I thought it was pretty informative.

I don't think anyone is making presumptions about Stephen Williams. He does have two things going in his favor though:

#1: The Arizona Cardinals are a notoriously incompetent franchise.

#2: Pete Carroll is not new to the idea of turning other team's bums into good football players.

_________________
Image
"I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman
"If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:29 pm 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7229
Stephen Williams probably won't pan out, but this signing shows one of the subtle things John Schneider does that makes him a brilliant GM. He signed Williams to a 2 year deal that pays Williams very close to the league minimum over 2013 and 2014. That way, if Williams actually has a good season in 2013, he's still coming back at a bargain rate in 2014. Pretty clever. Sign those desperate players to cheap multi-year deals while they are in no position to say no. He did the same trick with Brandon Browner.

_________________
Image
"I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman
"If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:36 pm 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7229

_________________
Image
"I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman
"If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:06 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
Posts: 3464
Location: Puyallup, WA USA
This video clearly shows that he has talent.....so did Mike Williams at times....he just wasn't consistent. If Stephan has hands like Larry Fitzgerald, then we might just have ourselves a real WR!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:32 am 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Posts: 820
I'm going to hope for the best. I like the potential but he might just be camp fodder, yes JS has had some huge signings but we've also had some total duds. Such is football, I just think it's premature to call this guy a replacement for Mike Williams who once caught 60+ passes.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:27 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 1680
I'm cautiously optimistic. Guys with big bodies that don't get great separation excel at 2 things:

quick slants where they can shield the defender, and jump balls.

Wilson doens't throw the quick slant all that well (yet).

Wilson excelled at throwing successful jump balls to 5'10" Golden Tate. If we can find a spot for him in this offense, I'm betting he can make an impact as a 1st down and red zone guy as a 4th or possible 3rd WR. Remember, the one constant with Baldwin is that he will get hurt. We need a solid #4 that can fill in for him.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:34 pm 
*Host of .NET Awards*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:51 pm
Posts: 4949
How is Baldwin being hurt a gimme? He got banged up good the first game and played hurt all year, but I wouldn't call him injury prone.

_________________
Legal Notice: Any references made by the online entity know as SacHawk 2.0 or "Sac" in regards to "Currystopstheruns" being a pre-op tranny with an anal tampon fetish are entirely accurate.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:41 pm 
* Gangnameister *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
Posts: 8724
Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
Hawks46 wrote:
I'm cautiously optimistic. Guys with big bodies that don't get great separation excel at 2 things:

quick slants where they can shield the defender, and jump balls.

Wilson doens't throw the quick slant all that well (yet).

Wilson excelled at throwing successful jump balls to 5'10" Golden Tate. If we can find a spot for him in this offense, I'm betting he can make an impact as a 1st down and red zone guy as a 4th or possible 3rd WR. Remember, the one constant with Baldwin is that he will get hurt. We need a solid #4 that can fill in for him.


What makes you say he doesn't get great separation? I haven't seen any real good vids on him, but dude apparently ran a 4.5 40 with a 2.52 20 yard split. That's pretty quick. Especially for a dude who's 6'5". Actually he's pretty comparable to Sidney Rice on the Al Davis "I only look at measurables" system. I'd be happy to have two Sidney Rices. Hopefully he can catch...

_________________
ImageImagePapaki douchebag love turtle long timeImageImage

What...? it's not like anyone banged a turtle or anything. Just chill.....


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 1:27 pm 
* NET Sage *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 7:28 am
Posts: 493
Great video there Kearly. Thanks for that.

Watching the highlights it's clear that this guy has talent -- very nice hands, gets good separation ... and that leaping ability (low whistle). Very nice. There were a couple of other things that I noticed with that video as well -- things that you could say could be potential strikes against him. The first thing that I noticed was that there looked like many instances in which he didn't get both feet down inbounds on routes to the sideline. Now those 1 foot in bounds catches work in college ... but not so much in the NFL. Also, he looks very lean and lanky in that film. That led me to wondering how he does against press coverage when CB's are really in his grill. I'm guessing not that well because there were no highlights of him fighting through press coverage off the line. So that might be a reason why he struggled against some when it came to going against some of those CB's from the bigger college programs -- just bigger, stronger, faster guys. One thing's for sure, we're going to find out just how well he does against press coverage in training camp, as he's going to be going against some of the best in the league in Brandon Browner, Richard Sherman, and company. There's a lot to like from what I saw there, but I'll reserve my judgment until training camp and the preseason.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:28 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 2:07 pm
Posts: 567
Definitely like how he grabs the ball at its highest point in a lot of those grabs, seems like he could be a nice weapon in the end zone (a la Wilsons TD pass to fitz)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is Stephen Williams the replacement for Mike Williams?
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 2:37 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 1284
Lot's of preseason roster spots to fill. Let's see what happens.

_________________
Give me some damn skittles...


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.