Reading that Jets may want to unload Revis before his contract is up at the end of 2013.
his salary is 6 million.
Flynn for Revis?
Imagine Sherman, Revis and Browner..
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/jason ... elle-revis
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
Winterfell wrote:I'm so turned on by this idea.
I don't think it will happen, but if it does that sure would make for an even more imposing secondary. That would be funny if we moved Brandon Browner to Hill's position, essentially a fast lengthy LB to cover the TE and RB coming out of the backfield for a pass lol.
Fox0r wrote:
San Diego Chargers Board is that way ----->
chris98251 wrote:Why? you don't pay a CB 6 million to play nickel, and all you were complaining about wasting money on a Back up QB. That would actually save your season possibly.
therealjohncarlson wrote:chris98251 wrote:Why? you don't pay a CB 6 million to play nickel, and all you were complaining about wasting money on a Back up QB. That would actually save your season possibly.
You really dont think Revis would start on our team? Is that really what you're implying?
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
theENGLISHseahawk wrote:Could see Tampa Bay showing interest here.
JSeahawks wrote:It baffles me that anybody would be against a move like this.
joeshaney wrote:JSeahawks wrote:It baffles me that anybody would be against a move like this.
I'm against it.....
Unless its the single free agency option available.
Lets spend our money on the most important position on defense.....pass rushers.....much better idea!
JSeahawks wrote:joeshaney wrote:JSeahawks wrote:It baffles me that anybody would be against a move like this.
I'm against it.....
Unless its the single free agency option available.
Lets spend our money on the most important position on defense.....pass rushers.....much better idea!
6 million is a bargain for somebody like Revis. We could afford to do both.
The Battle #83 wrote:Revis is a free agent after the 2013 season and has a no franchise tag clause in his contract and will want 10-13 million a year. It would be a luxury while having the legion of boom.
chris98251 wrote:For arguements sake, if the choice was Revis or a top 3 tech DT which way do you go?
Jay Ratliff, Dallas Cowboys
They also need a back up for Romo.
joeshaney wrote:But not jay
joeshaney wrote:Because revis would be more impactful than the 31 year old Ratliff whose production is on the decline. The dwi isn't the breaker, but it doesn't help.
Not that I wouldn't trade Flynn for Ratliff, but revis is a better deal and we would still have enough to land the top St in free agency. I'd much prefer Melton over Ratliff. Add revis and a solid draft and wow.
It is currently Mon Apr 23, 2018 1:27 pm