Guss

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:49 pm
  • The more I think about the interviews for head coaching positions he had during the playoffs the more this whole thing makes sense-Our run defense was INEPT in the first half and secondary porous in the final drive against Atlanta. His second interview with the Eagles was a day before the game; come on man.

    The league really has to stop the feeding frenzy on coaching vacancies until AFTER the playoffs. Otherwise we'll miss you Guss...
    HalG6
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 31
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:01 am


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 8:52 pm
  • While I don't really believe that it affected the outcome of this game, it does seem a bit odd to me that coaching vacancies are being interviewed for and filled during the playoffs. I suppose it makes sense that you'd want to fill the position as quickly as possible, and ideally well before free agency starts (as the lack of a head coach would obviously be a serious deterrant to players who want to know who their boss will be), but it does seem like an enormous potential distraction.
    User avatar
    jkitsune
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2116
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:12 pm
  • Funny how Gus interviewing before the game affected the run-defense in only the first half and the secondary only last 30 seconds.

    Not both at the same time, but separate, seemingly random times in the game. Hmmm..yeah, makes sense. Must be the reason.
    I am Godzilla, you are Japan!
    User avatar
    Recon_Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2061
    Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:01 pm
    Location: Vancouver, Wa


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:19 pm
  • Spooky.
    User avatar
    godawg
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 469
    Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:46 pm


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:21 pm
  • Grow up man, its was the players, not the defensive coordinator, that couldnt stop those running backs.
    User avatar
    therealjohncarlson
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3451
    Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:24 pm
  • Recon_Hawk wrote:Funny how Gus interviewing before the game affected the run-defense in only the first half and the secondary only last 30 seconds.

    Not both at the same time, but separate, seemingly random times in the game. Hmmm..yeah, makes sense. Must be the reason.



    No; I only chose those two glaring instances for obvious reasons. We came out flat on D and that cannot be denied-
    HalG6
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 31
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:01 am


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:27 pm
  • therealjohncarlson wrote:Grow up man, its was the players, not the defensive coordinator, that couldnt stop those running backs.



    No; the league should not allow interviews of coaching staff until after teams are eliminated or seasons end. He would have had a clearer focus on the task at hand-
    HalG6
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 31
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:01 am


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:34 pm
  • Mods, isn't there a way to prevent posters with less than 50 posts to start new threads?

    HalG6 wrote:...


    Really dude? Ridiculous...
    _________________
    "I can deal with Kap looking/acting like a douchebag so long as he wins. You can't be a douche AND a loser, Kap. Get your ---- together, a-hole."

    .....................................................................................-Webzone Niner fan GhostOfJimmyDean
    User avatar
    Trenchbroom
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1853
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:47 am
    Location: Spokangeles


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:37 pm
  • Trenchbroom wrote:Mods, isn't there a way to prevent posters with less than 50 posts to start new threads?

    HalG6 wrote:...


    Really dude? Ridiculous...



    So you think that it was okay for Guss to interview with two or three teams before the Atlanta game?

    < 50 posts
    HalG6
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 31
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:01 am


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 9:39 pm
  • Trenchbroom wrote:Mods, isn't there a way to prevent posters with less than 50 posts to start new threads?


    Come on man, his opinion and right to start a new thread and idea is just as important as yours, mine, and anyone else's here. That being said, I completely disagree with this opinion...... I do actually think they should wait until after the postseason to start interviewing coaches and stuff, much like free agency- some NFL rules are just straight up retarded- but I think it's entirely out of the realm of possibility that it had a legitimate effect on the outcome of the game. :th2thumbs:
    Image
    nategreat
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1337
    Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 11:36 am


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:23 pm
  • HalG6 wrote:
    Recon_Hawk wrote:Funny how Gus interviewing before the game affected the run-defense in only the first half and the secondary only last 30 seconds.

    Not both at the same time, but separate, seemingly random times in the game. Hmmm..yeah, makes sense. Must be the reason.



    No; I only chose those two glaring instances for obvious reasons. We came out flat on D and that cannot be denied-


    But that doesn't mean Bradley's interview was the reason for it. Heck, he could have had a short, one hour interview while the rest of the team and staff was watching the Packers-49ers game in their hotel room. We just don't know if it made any difference.

    If teams come out flat, why do we automatically blame the coaches for not preparing or getting them ready? The truth is, the players have a responsibility to come out sharp and ready, too, and sometimes, the players don't hold up their end of it, no matter what the coaches do.
    I am Godzilla, you are Japan!
    User avatar
    Recon_Hawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2061
    Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:01 pm
    Location: Vancouver, Wa


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:28 pm
  • I'm not buying these woe is me excuses, as a Franchise that has success you learn to deal with these things. If it was a distraction then it's on Pete and the Front Office for allowing interviews during our preperation week.
    Image

    To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
    Check your PM's, Thank you for everything Radish RIP My Friend. :les:
    Member of the 38 club.
    User avatar
    chris98251
    .NET Hijacker
     
    Posts: 10547
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
    Location: Renton Wa.


Re: Guss
Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:50 pm
  • I don't know how many times it has to be repeated by multiple people, but these interviews aren't a big deal. It's a short interview done after the game plan is already installed and it's done in the coaches limited free time anyway. It wasn't a factor.
    Happybelly
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 92
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:09 am


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 3:32 am
  • It's amazing how shitty people can be when someone posts an opinion they don't subscribe to.
    User avatar
    bellingerga
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5313
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
    Location: Beaverton, Oregon


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 4:26 am
  • Bradley had a relaxed 90 minute interview on Saturday night.

    It almost certainly had zero impact on the game.
    User avatar
    theENGLISHseahawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7960
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:13 am
  • imo if the gameplan he drew up was solid then the interview shouldn't matter that much.
    User avatar
    brimsalabim
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1425
    Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2012 6:50 am


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:23 am
  • Game plan was already in place. Players may have been distracted but I really doubt it. Stupid soft zone did us in, and that's on PC and Gus Bradley.
    User avatar
    hedgehawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 579
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 1:37 pm


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 5:46 am
  • You. Need. To. Let. The. Atlanta. Game. Go.

    You've started several threads trying to pick apart the outcome of this game, looking for a way to blame the refs or the coordinators.

    "Russell got the play off at the end of the 1st half!"

    "Turbin's 3rd and 1 was converted!"

    "Bradley interviewing threw everyone off and prevented players from doing their jobs!"

    Please, for your own mental well-being, let it go.

    Wilson didn't get the play off. Turbin didn't get the 1st down.

    And Bradley didn't interview with "2 or 3 teams before the game." It was one team, the Eagles, for a brief introductory interview. As English pointed out, it wasn't even 2 hours long, and it wasn't during a time when the team was supposed to be installing the super-secret special defense that would have prevented us from getting gashed by Turner or giving up big plays to Gonzalez.

    Sometimes, the players just don't play well enough. That's what happened in Atlanta.
    Image

    Super Bowl XLVIII Champions
    User avatar
    volsunghawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 8035
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
    Location: Right outside Richard Sherman's house


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:17 am
  • Gus interviewing with the Eagles had nothing to do with Jacquizz Rodgers and Michael Turner breaking tackles by Red Bryant, Earl Thomas, and ALL our LBers.

    Gus interviewing also had nothing to do with Kam Chancellor being beat by Gonzalez in the end zone.

    Gus interviewing also had nothing to do with Marshawn fumbling.

    Gus interviewing also had nothing to do with Russell Wilson being sacked with no TOs left in the 1st half.

    Gus interviewing also had nothing to do with Turbin not being able to get 1 yard on 3rd down and then Robinson not being able to get 1 yard on 4th down.
    User avatar
    FargoHawk
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 781
    Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:02 am


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:37 am
  • i agree the interviewing process needs to be conducted after the playoffs... i however do no agree that the interview played some part in the break down of the running Defense or the secondary at the end... our run d has been suspect all year since the SF game, and that stupid zone coverage does nothing to prevent apposing teams from moving the ball in large chunks, i hate it, we should have manned up there.. that's what got us to that point, why go away from it...
    World Champs - Sounds good don't it
    User avatar
    hawker84
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3987
    Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
    Location: Tri Cities, WA


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:44 am
  • jkitsune wrote:While I don't really believe that it affected the outcome of this game, it does seem a bit odd to me that coaching vacancies are being interviewed for and filled during the playoffs. I suppose it makes sense that you'd want to fill the position as quickly as possible, and ideally well before free agency starts (as the lack of a head coach would obviously be a serious deterrant to players who want to know who their boss will be), but it does seem like an enormous potential distraction.


    If it only made a 3 pt difference I for one am STEAMED!
    User avatar
    HUGGY
    *NET Poop Holster*
     
    Posts: 310
    Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:07 pm
    Location: N. Seattle


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:29 am
  • Trenchbroom wrote:Mods, isn't there a way to prevent posters with less than 50 posts to start new threads?

    HalG6 wrote:...


    Really dude? Ridiculous...



    No but there is a serious move underfoot to prevent posters with 800 posts to not post in them.

    :roll:
    Image
    On to week two. Week one was not a fluke!
    User avatar
    The Radish
    * NET Radish *
     
    Posts: 18655
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
    Location: Spokane, Wa.


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:21 am
  • Oh newbies... They're like a crazy uncle spouting conspiracy theories at Thanksgiving dinner.

    Can we try blaming the loss on lithium batteries, the communist agenda or BPA in the Gatorade bucket while we're at it..?

    And while we're at it... Who's Guss? Sounds European.
    Radish, check your PMs. Man upstairs has an invite for a tail gate up in heaven with your name on it.
    User avatar
    CANHawk
    * Gangnameister *
     
    Posts: 11305
    Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm
    Location: PoCompton, BC Canada


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 9:37 am
  • It's doubtful that Gus' interview had an impact on the game, since they had a whole week to prepare.

    I agree that there need to be a rule change where coaching vacancies shouldn't be filled until after the SuperBowl to give every coordinator an equal opportunity at the job.

    And for those of you telling this guy to grow up, you grow up. He has his opinion, it's a team forum. If you have nothing good to add to the discussion but ragging on him, then go elsewhere
    No autographs please
    User avatar
    Jerhawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 327
    Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:39 am
    Location: Spokane, WA


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:16 am
  • The NFL cannot nor should not restrict coaching interviews until after the season is over. The reason is that the upcoming draft has to be evaluated with the coach's input as soon as possible. You have the Shrine game and Sr Bowl (plus that scam NFLPA game) that fall on the wrong side of the Superbowl. Sure, you have the regular bowl games where the coach in place may be fired soon afterwards. But the NFL scouts and coaches are at an arm's length, where these bowl games allows your team's personnel people an up and close interaction.

    Just because your team is successful shouldn't restrict coaching staff to get an opportunity to move up. Teams have some control in allowing coaches under contract from interviewing. It has been done before, only to fire the coach the next year. I am sure that leads to a healthy interaction among the coaching staff.

    Give it a rest is my suggestion.
    Image
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
    Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    R.I.P Les "PithyRadish" Norton 9/13/2014
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 9209
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Covington, Washington


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:33 am
  • drdiags wrote:The NFL cannot nor should not restrict coaching interviews until after the season is over. The reason is that the upcoming draft has to be evaluated with the coach's input as soon as possible. You have the Shrine game and Sr Bowl (plus that scam NFLPA game) that fall on the wrong side of the Superbowl. Sure, you have the regular bowl games where the coach in place may be fired soon afterwards. But the NFL scouts and coaches are at an arm's length, where these bowl games allows your team's personnel people an up and close interaction.

    Just because your team is successful shouldn't restrict coaching staff to get an opportunity to move up. Teams have some control in allowing coaches under contract from interviewing. It has been done before, only to fire the coach the next year. I am sure that leads to a healthy interaction among the coaching staff.

    Give it a rest is my suggestion.


    That's good input; question is about 'under contract' I guess with me. I am certainly looking forward to next years version of Hawks D under coach Quinn and I am beyond it- only to this extent.
    HalG6
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 31
    Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 7:01 am


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:45 am
  • Recon_Hawk wrote:Funny how Gus interviewing before the game affected the run-defense in only the first half and the secondary only last 30 seconds.

    Not both at the same time, but separate, seemingly random times in the game. Hmmm..yeah, makes sense. Must be the reason.



    Maybe it was his gameplan. The sooner the season is over, the sooner he has a head coaching job. Problem with this argument is that those jobs weren't guaranteed - or were they?

    Either way, smart players play smart and if Gus did try to sabotage (which I am not saying he did - this has been a theory tossed around about many coordinators-to-be-head-coaches), I'd expect our smart players, especially secondary, to step up - they did not (see Lions game, Dolphins game).
    User avatar
    OneLofaTatupu
    * NET Shrink *
     
    Posts: 1560
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 10:04 pm
    Location: Seattle, WA


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:41 pm
  • Jerhawk wrote:I agree that there need to be a rule change where coaching vacancies shouldn't be filled until after the SuperBowl to give every coordinator an equal opportunity at the job.

    Might I suggest that you do some research on this subject and come back and present the pros and cons of your suggestion.

    The system in place today is considered the best solution because it balances the needs of the team looking to hire a HC with the desire of the Ass't. Coach to get an opportunity at a promotion... and as well, takes into account the needs of the team who currently has the Asst. Coach under contract.

    It's not a perfect system but it pretty darn good at the balancing act.
    EastCoastHawksFan posted... "Trading for Harvin is by far the worst move John S has ever made." (March 18, 2014)

    your World Champion Seattle Seahawks.. how sweet is that!!
    User avatar
    onanygivensunday
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3085
    Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 8:59 am


Re: Guss
Wed Jan 23, 2013 1:49 pm
  • Another factor that isn't mentioned here is that there are Important college scouting events happening during the playoffs. Most teams have coaches at these events which are crucial to evaluating players for the draft.
    User avatar
    FargoHawk
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
    *BRONZE SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 781
    Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:02 am


Re: Guss
Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:38 am
  • onanygivensunday wrote:
    Jerhawk wrote:I agree that there need to be a rule change where coaching vacancies shouldn't be filled until after the SuperBowl to give every coordinator an equal opportunity at the job.

    Might I suggest that you do some research on this subject and come back and present the pros and cons of your suggestion.

    The system in place today is considered the best solution because it balances the needs of the team looking to hire a HC with the desire of the Ass't. Coach to get an opportunity at a promotion... and as well, takes into account the needs of the team who currently has the Asst. Coach under contract.

    It's not a perfect system but it pretty darn good at the balancing act.



    http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1480316-it-benefits-mike-mccoy-gus-bradley-nfl-coordinators-to-lose-in-the-playoffs

    This isn't a formal research report, this is an internet forum. But since you want research, I found a source for you. Written January 11th. If you read the above article, it states several examples of how coaches such as Chuck Pogano doesn't feel like he would've been hired as Colts coach if Baltimore wins the AFC Championship last year.

    Also, with the headline of the article, how Gus Bradley and Mike McCoy get first dibs at head coacing vacancies since their teams were eliminated.

    The system in place is flawed. For one, the lack of minority coaches, while it may not deal with this argument, is one problem. You claim that the system is good.

    Coordinators who are on Superbowl teams right now won't get a shot at what would've been other coaching vacancies like the Cardinals or Chargers. If the 49ers were still playing, do you think it's possible that a team wouldn't want their defensive coordinator?

    Also in the article, it points out that Bill O'Brian was hired by a college team while he was still O Coordinator of the Pats before the Superbowl last year.

    While the BleacherReport isn't a great source, this shows that I'm not the only one who thinks that the system is flawed.
    Last edited by Jerhawk on Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:26 am, edited 3 times in total.
    No autographs please
    User avatar
    Jerhawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 327
    Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:39 am
    Location: Spokane, WA


Re: Guss
Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:44 am
  • Although, to your argument, it is up to the head coach whether or not to allow their coordinators/assts to go on the interview.

    Back to the topic of this thread, would it have looked bad on Carroll then to not allow Gus to interview for head coaching vacancies? If this rule were changed for teams to wait until after the SuperBowl to interview coordinators and assts, then the head coach wouldn't feel responsible for keeping his coordinators from getting a coaching job at another team.
    No autographs please
    User avatar
    Jerhawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 327
    Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:39 am
    Location: Spokane, WA


Re: Guss
Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:48 am
  • FargoHawk wrote:Another factor that isn't mentioned here is that there are Important college scouting events happening during the playoffs. Most teams have coaches at these events which are crucial to evaluating players for the draft.


    The Senior Bowl is played on January 26th. Outside of this, what other major scouting events are there that occur during the playoffs?

    The Scouting Combine isn't until the end of February. There's plenty of game tape of college prospects and scouts that have been with the team all season looking at who to draft. Pushing back the date to hire a head coach by a few weeks wouldn't interfere with these events.
    No autographs please
    User avatar
    Jerhawk
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 327
    Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:39 am
    Location: Spokane, WA




It is currently Thu Sep 18, 2014 10:01 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information