| Author |
Message |
|
peachesenregalia
|
Post subject: Kiper's first mock Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:54 pm |
|
| * NET Starfish * |
 |
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am Posts: 8775 Location: Vaes Dothrak
|
|
he has us taking John Jenkins, Georgia DT with the #25 pick. Looks like he actually did a little bit of research on this one. I know little about Jenkins, any thoughts?
_________________ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:55 pm |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 10347 Location: Portland, OR
|
|
Kiper likes him?
Pass.
/obligatory Aaron Curry 'sure thing' reference, Russell Wilson dismissal
_________________ My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
peachesenregalia
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:58 pm |
|
| * NET Starfish * |
 |
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am Posts: 8775 Location: Vaes Dothrak
|
|
Well, from what I can gather, Jenkins is just a big fat body that will draw doubles and stuff the run. Doesn't really seem like a fit.
_________________ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
12th_Bob
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 1:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 7:56 pm Posts: 1062
|
|
Not all bad but some teams are taking a QB, they have too and I don't care who says otherwise. Someone will reach for a Glennon just like the Vikings reached for Ponder.
Jenkins doesn't really fit us, he would be a great pick for a team like the Steelers but a waste for us unless we want more 2-gap DT. We need DE's and 3rd down rush tackles with length and speed, Jenkins isn't one of those.
_________________ NFL, all your Owlz are belong to us!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawkFan72
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 2:06 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am Posts: 8172 Location: Antioch, CA
|
peachesenregalia wrote: Well, from what I can gather, Jenkins is just a big fat body that will draw doubles and stuff the run. Doesn't really seem like a fit. I actually think this may be just the type of player the Hawks will go after. A huge D-lineman who will eat up bodies. Not sure they will do it in the first round, but definitely could see it. Our run D was NOT good this year. Branch, Red, Mebane, and McDonald were getting run over in the last half of the year, especially. We ranked in the 20's for run defense. That is not acceptable for a Carroll Defense. We need a good run stuffer who can absolutely clog the middle. Branch is not this type of player, Red is not this type of player, McDonald is not this type of player, mebane is not this type of player. Jenkins could be the guy who stuffs the run up the middle and allows these other D-linemen to make some plays.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
therealjohncarlson
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 2:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm Posts: 2716
|
peachesenregalia wrote: Well, from what I can gather, Jenkins is just a big fat body that will draw doubles and stuff the run. Doesn't really seem like a fit. So Colin Cole 2.0?
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 2:46 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am Posts: 5695 Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
|
Kiper will NEVER hit on a draft pick that Pete Carroll/John Schneider actually want, especially in the early rounds.
His mind just cannot wrap itself around our out-of-the-box philosophy.
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:25 pm |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am Posts: 7234
|
|
I wonder what his reasoning was. Jenkins is 351 pounds. Pretty clearly, he's a run stopper only. Mebane is doing a bang up job and Seattle can retain Branch easily if they choose. I'm all for thinking about life after Red Bryant, but Jenkins wouldn't really make a lot of sense as a 5-tech.
Seems like Kiper failed to do his homework.
And no QBs in the top 3? Right...
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 3:28 pm |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 10347 Location: Portland, OR
|
kearly wrote: I wonder what his reasoning was. Jenkins is 351 pounds. Pretty clearly, he's a run stopper only. Mebane is doing a bang up job and Seattle can retain Branch easily if they choose. I'm all for thinking about life after Red Bryant, but Jenkins wouldn't really make a lot of sense as a 5-tech.
Seems like Kiper failed to do his homework.
And no QBs in the top 3? Right... His reasoning is that Seattle needs a defensive tackle. Therefore he saw a player with DT next to his name that he rated well and put the name down and moved on. Scheme fit, meme spit.
_________________ My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CALIHAWK1
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:05 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm Posts: 6251 Location: Is Everything
|
kearly wrote: And no QBs in the top 3? Right...
Did I not read it right? I didn't see any QB's. Maybe I missed something. There is an increasing number of draft talking heads with Barkley out of the first however, which I don't know if I can imagine. Although the word of a "brawl" after SC's bowl game due to younger players questioning his leadership may indicate something too.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
lukerguy
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm Posts: 887
|
kearly wrote: I wonder what his reasoning was. Jenkins is 351 pounds. Pretty clearly, he's a run stopper only. Mebane is doing a bang up job and Seattle can retain Branch easily if they choose. I'm all for thinking about life after Red Bryant, but Jenkins wouldn't really make a lot of sense as a 5-tech.
Seems like Kiper failed to do his homework.
And no QBs in the top 3? Right... I saw another article on Kiper's mock and thought the exact same thing. Initially it makes sense from the logic, "Seattle struggled to stop the run, and Jenkins is the biggest run stopper in the draft". However, as you mentioned Kearly, basically all this pick does is replace Branch's technique IMO. You don't draft a NT to be a 5 tech...soo really all this pick does is leave us about the same position as it would if we were to just re-sign Branch (which he said he wanted to do already). I think what it boils down to is if you go DT, you go with a guy to replace Branch on passing downs- not on the roster.
_________________  "We all we got, we all we need"
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:12 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am Posts: 6396
|
|
ESPN's draft service included Todd McShay describing Whitney Mercilus as a 360lbs nose tackle last year shortly after the end of the college season. It included a full break down of his skills as a massive nose tackle too. Which either means McShay doesn't write up everything that he lends his name to, that he doesn't scout every player he passes comment on or the whoever wrote that piece doesn't watch much college football.
I'm surprised they got away with it so lightly.
This is just a classic case of filling a need with 'any' defensive tackle. We do not need a big nose tackle who doesn't pass rush.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2013 9:54 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm Posts: 2670
|
kearly wrote: And no QBs in the top 3? Right... Not entirely out of the question IMO kearly. This might sound crazy, but I can see KC trading for Nick Foles - who I don't think fits Chip Kelly's scheme whatsoever. Then who knows, maybe the Jags trade a low pick for Flynn .. and even if they don't.. two high 1st round picks spent on QB's in the last 3 years? I don't see that .. and the Raiders need to go D in a bad bad way. They won't go QB at 3. No QB's going in the first 3 picks isn't too far fetched this offseason IMO.
_________________ Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 7:26 am |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am Posts: 9704
|
therealjohncarlson wrote: peachesenregalia wrote: Well, from what I can gather, Jenkins is just a big fat body that will draw doubles and stuff the run. Doesn't really seem like a fit. So Colin Cole 2.0? Cole didn't draw doubles.
_________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Chawker
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 11:46 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:18 am Posts: 1238 Location: corner of 40th & plum
|
peachesenregalia wrote: Well, from what I can gather, Jenkins is just a big fat body that will draw doubles and stuff the run. Doesn't really seem like a fit. I thought Kwame Geathers got more doulbe teams then Jenkins, leading to the success he had this season. One on one Geathers can push the pocket better then any other DT in this draft. Geathers will excell at the next level. As far as Kiper..... nice hair.
_________________ Joplo Bartu needs to be signed. PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HUGGY
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:39 pm |
|
| *NET Poop Holster* |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:07 pm Posts: 310 Location: N. Seattle
|
peachesenregalia wrote: he has us taking John Jenkins, Georgia DT with the #25 pick. Looks like he actually did a little bit of research on this one. I know little about Jenkins, any thoughts? He doesn't seem to be able to keep his grades up ...AKA..he's not too bright. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Kj7gvA3RP0
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HUGGY
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:50 pm |
|
| *NET Poop Holster* |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:07 pm Posts: 310 Location: N. Seattle
|
kearly wrote: I wonder what his reasoning was. Jenkins is 351 pounds. Pretty clearly, he's a run stopper only. Mebane is doing a bang up job and Seattle can retain Branch easily if they choose. I'm all for thinking about life after Red Bryant, but Jenkins wouldn't really make a lot of sense as a 5-tech.
Seems like Kiper failed to do his homework.
And no QBs in the top 3? Right... Seems Jenkins failed to do HIS homework... LOL
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
ivotuk
|
Post subject: Re: Kiper's first mock Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:13 pm |
|
| * NET Nobody * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:29 pm Posts: 4870
|
theENGLISHseahawk wrote: ESPN's draft service included Todd McShay describing Whitney Mercilus as a 360lbs nose tackle last year shortly after the end of the college season. It included a full break down of his skills as a massive nose tackle too. Which either means McShay doesn't write up everything that he lends his name to, that he doesn't scout every player he passes comment on or the whoever wrote that piece doesn't watch much college football.. All of the Above. McShay is a pretty boy who knows a little about football. Figurehead for the guys who work for him and do the real work. But they aren't very good either. I've watched their little videos and read their tweets/articles and it's always as if they glossed over the player, read somebody else's report then regurgitated it with a few changes here and there. Zero originality.
_________________ Joe Vellano, DT, 6'1", 300lbs, 61 tkls 14 TFL, 6 sacks" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc_yzeVi-eU, Mike Catapano 6'4" 271QB Jordan Rodgers 6'1" 212# 2539 Yards, 60% completion 15td/5int
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 18 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |