 |
| Author |
Message |
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am Posts: 876
|
volsunghawk wrote: Aldon Smith was a part timer his first year, too. He's seemed to develop pretty well.
He also had over twice as many tackles and almost twice as many sacks. Irvin certainly has Smith type potential, but it might take til year 4 or 5 for that to happen. Smith was a much more polished DE coming out of Missouri, even as young as he was.......which is pretty scary.
_________________ If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:09 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am Posts: 6156 Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
Sgt. Largent wrote: volsunghawk wrote: Aldon Smith was a part timer his first year, too. He's seemed to develop pretty well.
He also had over twice as many tackles and almost twice as many sacks. Irvin certainly has Smith type potential, but it might take til year 4 or 5 for that to happen. Smith was a much more polished DE coming out of Missouri, even as young as he was.......which is pretty scary. Point is, he was still a part-timer. He developed. No, Irvin isn't on his level yet - and may never be - but the way SF has brought Smith along suggests that a part-time player who was identified as a pass rush specialist can develop into an every down player and expand his repertoire. There are some folks in this thread who seem unwilling to give that same opportunity for development to Irvin, instead calling him a disappointment or bust or whatever right after he set a Seahawks rookie record for sacks. I wonder if some of these folks are the same ones who were prepared to declare Russell Okung a bust and made of glass after his rookie season, or who decided Max Unger was useless after his first year.
_________________ Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:15 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6417
|
volsunghawk wrote: Sgt. Largent wrote: volsunghawk wrote: Aldon Smith was a part timer his first year, too. He's seemed to develop pretty well.
He also had over twice as many tackles and almost twice as many sacks. Irvin certainly has Smith type potential, but it might take til year 4 or 5 for that to happen. Smith was a much more polished DE coming out of Missouri, even as young as he was.......which is pretty scary. Point is, he was still a part-timer. He developed. No, Irvin isn't on his level yet - and may never be - but the way SF has brought Smith along suggests that a part-time player who was identified as a pass rush specialist can develop into an every down player and expand his repertoire. There are some folks in this thread who seem unwilling to give that same opportunity for development to Irvin, instead calling him a disappointment or bust or whatever right after he set a Seahawks rookie record for sacks. I wonder if some of these folks are the same ones who were prepared to declare Russell Okung a bust and made of glass after his rookie season, or who decided Max Unger was useless after his first year. Or James Carpenter. Or Koren Robinson. Or Chris McIntosh. Or Owen Gill. (Don't get mad at me, bro. Remember, I picked #2.) I wouldn't put Irvin in Either of those player groupings.
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
DavidSeven
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:16 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:15 am Posts: 633
|
|
If Bruce's Twitter is any indication, he's VERY dedicated and passionate about getting better and proving the draft-day doubters wrong. Anyway, are we really going to pick apart these guys' interview demeanors now? Geez, would hate to see what you guys would say about Marshawn.
Bruce had a very good year. His presence was felt and he contributed. Came up huge on two plays in a wildcard PLAYOFF game. Seems the PC/JS regime's drafting success is leading some onlookers to get mighty spoiled and entitled. It's like a guy is deemed an immediate bust if they aren't a top 3 DROY or OROY candidate. Give these guys a chance to develop and appreciate their immediate contributions. Who knows what kind of career Bruce will have, but he showed some early promise in year one. Don't know how you can deny that.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
volsunghawk
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:22 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am Posts: 6156 Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
|
bestfightstory wrote: volsunghawk wrote: Sgt. Largent wrote: He also had over twice as many tackles and almost twice as many sacks.
Irvin certainly has Smith type potential, but it might take til year 4 or 5 for that to happen. Smith was a much more polished DE coming out of Missouri, even as young as he was.......which is pretty scary. Point is, he was still a part-timer. He developed. No, Irvin isn't on his level yet - and may never be - but the way SF has brought Smith along suggests that a part-time player who was identified as a pass rush specialist can develop into an every down player and expand his repertoire. There are some folks in this thread who seem unwilling to give that same opportunity for development to Irvin, instead calling him a disappointment or bust or whatever right after he set a Seahawks rookie record for sacks. I wonder if some of these folks are the same ones who were prepared to declare Russell Okung a bust and made of glass after his rookie season, or who decided Max Unger was useless after his first year. Or James Carpenter. Or Koren Robinson. Or Chris McIntosh. Or Owen Gill. (Don't get mad at me, bro. Remember, I picked #2.) I wouldn't put Irvin in Either of those player groupings. I wouldn't, either, honestly, because it's far too early to determine, imo. We hear all the time about "the rookie wall" or about it taking time for rookies to adjust to the speed of the NFL, or to develop the body mass necessary to really excel. So if a rookie struggles to make a significant impact - even if they're a 1st rounder - I tend to see that more as something not really surprising, but par for the course. It's awesome when we find a rookie who shines rather than struggles, but usually they do a bit of both. And Irvin did have moments where he shined this year, just like he had moments where he struggled. In the end, I just don't think you can accurately predict whether a player is a scrub or a star in just their first year unless you're dealing with a clear outlier (like Wilson). I think each player needs time with the team for development, both physically and in his understanding of the scheme, to really find out what we have in him.
_________________ Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:26 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6417
|
volsunghawk wrote: We hear all the time about "the rookie wall" or about it taking time for rookies to adjust to the speed of the NFL, or to develop the body mass necessary to really excel. So if a rookie struggles to make a significant impact - even if they're a 1st rounder - I tend to see that more as something not really surprising, but par for the course. It's awesome when we find a rookie who shines rather than struggles, but usually they do a bit of both. And Irvin did have moments where he shined this year, just like he had moments where he struggled.
In the end, I just don't think you can accurately predict whether a player is a scrub or a star in just their first year unless you're dealing with a clear outlier (like Wilson). I think each player needs time with the team for development, both physically and in his understanding of the scheme, to really find out what we have in him.
Of course. You are absolutely right.
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am Posts: 876
|
volsunghawk wrote: In the end, I just don't think you can accurately predict whether a player is a scrub or a star in just their first year unless you're dealing with a clear outlier (like Wilson). I think each player needs time with the team for development, both physically and in his understanding of the scheme, to really find out what we have in him.
I'm with ya. I just don't like all the "OMG IRVIN'S THE BEST EVER PICK AND NO OTHER D-LINEMAN WOULD HAVE BEEN AS GOOD ON OUR TEAM!!!!!!!!" mentality. The fact is just about any of the other DL picks in the top 20 would have done well on our line. What we're banking on is the potential of Irvin being great.........as opposed to just serviceable.
_________________ If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
MANUNITED23
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:20 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 5:27 pm Posts: 1638 Location: Walnut Creek, CA
|
|
I believe he'll do fine, he just needs to work on his technique.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
chris98251
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:16 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm Posts: 6138 Location: Renton Wa.
|
|
Jeez, I would hope by now that people would understand that he was a raw player with great speed coming in, with still being raw he provided pressure a lot and got his sacks. Having Quinn here I think will unleash the beast that we will see for years to come. He has the right attitude and skills that you can't coach. Speed and a desire to prove himself and people wrong.
With Quinn here he will be double digit next year I would bank on it. I also expect to see him stronger and bigger by a few more pungds. I think I read he put on 15 to 20 more from his college weight. That alone is hard for a guy to assimulate and continue to perform at a high level. With training and technique we will see him be much more comfortable at that weight and he will regain more of his burst.
_________________  To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me... .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
FreshlySnipes
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 6:28 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 3:28 pm Posts: 380 Location: Mercer Island/ Menlo Park
|
|
Call it what you wanna call it... Rookie hangover.. Rookie Wall... 2nd year slump... But if there is any player who I think that will happen to, it's Bruce Irvin. I am basing this on his visible personality and work ethic. I think he will be a letdown next year but will eventually develop into a solid player in a few years.
_________________ Check out My Seahawks Youtube Channel: http://www.youtube.com/rxstr8
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Zowert
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:57 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:29 pm Posts: 1718 Location: Seattle
|
bestfightstory wrote: Don't take this the wrong way, please.
If you can't follow or havent followed this conversation from its start, please do not jump in midstream. Nothing personal, but believe me-you have asked a question of a quote that was directed at a specific person in a specific conversation within a room full of people talking at the same time (that would be a metaphor for this thread).
There is context to the above quote. And your question is not relevant to the argument I was having with that guy.
This whole thread, in fact, is a classic .NET scenario.
A poll is posted. Less than 3% have an opinion and choose the option that is seen as extreme. Lynch mobs and goon squads descend upon the thread and assume the worst of everyone's views. I can't even follow it anymore, myself, and I have been here from the beginning.
My vote was for option #2, btw, if it matters. It's my opinion. It's an opinion. An opinion. ' Jesus... Why are you so condescending? I think "themunn" was actually following your posts the best they could have possibly been followed. Actually, wait.. He went back and quoted most of your posts to prove it.. This one - Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:11 pm.. Didn't see that, my bad. Just relax a bit man. Seems to me like you attack the poster rather than respond to their actual post. Not all the time, but from this thread, that's what it looks like.
_________________ ~ The Stache'
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 8:51 am |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6417
|
Zowert wrote: bestfightstory wrote: Don't take this the wrong way, please.
If you can't follow or havent followed this conversation from its start, please do not jump in midstream. Nothing personal, but believe me-you have asked a question of a quote that was directed at a specific person in a specific conversation within a room full of people talking at the same time (that would be a metaphor for this thread).
There is context to the above quote. And your question is not relevant to the argument I was having with that guy.
This whole thread, in fact, is a classic .NET scenario.
A poll is posted. Less than 3% have an opinion and choose the option that is seen as extreme. Lynch mobs and goon squads descend upon the thread and assume the worst of everyone's views. I can't even follow it anymore, myself, and I have been here from the beginning.
My vote was for option #2, btw, if it matters. It's my opinion. It's an opinion. An opinion. ' Jesus... Why are you so condescending? I think "themunn" was actually following your posts the best they could have possibly been followed. Actually, wait.. He went back and quoted most of your posts to prove it.. This one - Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:11 pm.. Didn't see that, my bad. Just relax a bit man. Seems to me like you attack the poster rather than respond to their actual post. Not all the time, but from this thread, that's what it looks like. You missed more than that, but I am not going to get into it here. I am done with this particular thread. If you want to have this kind of conversation (or share other concerns about my internet identity) Id be happy to sort it out via PM.
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
DannyMcGwire
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 9:00 am |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:51 pm Posts: 10
|
|
I think you will see Bruce round into a more complete player next year. He might not have more or as many sacks, but will be a much better every down player. The kid had a great rookie year and I think that we will see him continue to grow.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
sutz
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 9:08 am |
|
| USMC 1970-77 |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:41 am Posts: 7438 Location: Monroe, WA
|
|
Couldn't read 5 pages of this discussion. Sorry.
I picked good rookie, will improve next year.
While I will never say something as stupid as "sacks don't matter" I do believe that fans, in general, overrate sacks while not seeing other attributes that players bring to the table. Also, there seems to be an undercurrent of "he was drafted here, so he should be this productive by now" in many fan opinions. And usually, their idea of what "productive" means can vary a lot. I'm thankful that our coaches and FO have their own criteria to evaluate players and make decisions about who to cut or not.
I feel about Irvin about like I felt about Tate all along. Give him some time.
_________________ Talent can get you to the playoffs. It takes character to win when you get there.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Seahawk Sailor
|
Post subject: Re: Thoughts on Bruce Irvin + Future Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 9:47 am |
|
| * Navy Badass * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:23 am Posts: 16247 Location: Bothell
|
|
Let's keep it civil here, folks.
Irvin had a pretty decent year, especially considering the limited role he had. It's easy to second guess and post-season armchair quarterback the draft picks. Irvin is arguably not even the first or second best player taken by his own team, with the stunning success of Wagner and Wilson, but hindsight's 20/20, isn't that right, Mel Kiper?
You can find a bunch of rookies taken after him and make the point he was a reach/bust. But you can also find rookies taken before him and argue the opposite.
And as far as the bottom line goes, he's nowhere close to the worst first rounder we've taken. The pick was a bit of a head-scratcher when he was viewed by the front office as the best pick available at a position of need, but he's no Aaron Curry.
_________________ I blog, I tweet. When I'm not writing or goofing around on Seahawks.NET.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: -seanhawk-, 671hawk, Barthawk, BCHawk, bestfightstory, Bill Assumpcao, CFraychineaud, cvcahawk, Google [Bot], Hawken-Dazs, HawkinInLA, jammerhawk, lacenterhawk, Largent80, Mandu, MissoulaHawkFan, nepahawk, onanygivensunday, ORSeaNut, ruffENrowdy, SeatownJay, Spleenhawk2.0, tomahawk, tyshawkfan, v1rotv2, VancitySeahawk, warden, zelter and 133 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|