Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:53 pm 
NET Rookie
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 146
Location: Spokane
Ill tell you, that guy Reinfeldt is a whiz on his calculator! A real up and coming player in the cap game![/quote]

I can't imagine that it is good for the calculator if you whiz on it!

_________________
Go Hawks!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:56 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:20 am
Posts: 6156
Location: Surrounded by Elway, Tebow, and Manning jerseys
hawksfansinceday1 wrote:
volsunghawk wrote:
Not really interested in rehashing Reinfeldt. He had a big part in us losing Hutchinson.

Really? I'd love a link cuz I was convinced it was nearly if not all Timmmaaaaay. He made jokes about being 'the guy that lost Hutch' being put on his tombstone and by looking at his drafts it was obvious he saw o-lineman as eminently and consistently replacable.


http://www.komonews.com/sports/5756051.html

Quote:
Reinfeldt was part of the decision to designate Pro Bowl guard Steve Hutchinson a transition player instead of a franchise player last offseason. Hutchinson signed with Minnesota in free agency after the Vikings included an unprecedented "poison pill" contract provision Seattle could not match.


I'm not saying I would expect him to do exactly the same thing again, but to me, this signified a guy who didn't understand the value of Hutch to the O-line and team as a whole. I would worry about him having a voice in the FO if he still has blind spots that big.

_________________
Image

Okay, so maybe that pass rush is still an issue. Lather, rinse, repeat.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 2:27 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 2:05 pm
Posts: 1984
Location: Kenmore WA
I don't think losing our cap guy will impact the team as much as losing another coach this year,...I'm sure they will get a good replacement for Idzik,...I think Reinfeldt would be a good choice ,...but whoever it is,.." in J and P we trust",....


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:35 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am
Posts: 1155
Sgt. Largent wrote:
Blitzer88 wrote:
Man, I really hate how we keep losing our staff guys..........can't we have the same guys from one year to the next lol.


You want to lose your coaches and personnel, it means you're successful.

Pete and John is all we need, the rest of the staff is just frosting. Look at NE, Belicheat's lost just about every coach 2-3 times over, and they're still on top.


I don't think you "want" to lose them. Especially if those guys truly did get you to where you are (we won't know until we see the effect of them being gone). I'd say it's more of an unwanted compliment.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:47 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 6:29 pm
Posts: 149
Location: Santa Barbara
Hamhawk wrote:
I don't think losing our cap guy will impact the team as much as losing another coach this year,...I'm sure they will get a good replacement for Idzik,...I think Reinfeldt would be a good choice ,...but whoever it is,.." in J and P we trust",....


Look, let us pretend that the whole Hutch mess was all on Reinfeldt...that doesn't change the fact that he is known to be very good at NFL franchise economics. Also, who hasn't screwed something up in their life and then grown from it, there is no way he lets something like that happen on his watch a second time. So this may not be such a bad match.

_________________
Steve Largent is greatest Seahawk WR of all time


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:32 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 783
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
What!! How are we going to find someone that knows how to add...AND Subtract?! Ffffffffuuuuh.... that's the end. We're doomed!!

_________________
Image
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:25 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 6140
Location: Renton Wa.
The Vikings pulling the poisen pill routine was unprecedented, guaranteeing that Hutch would be the top payid lineman as part of his contract was an obvious situation to not be able to negotiate a contract with him with Jones here. They knew that. Historically teams did not pull that stuff and Reinfeldt was basing his thoughts on a degree of good sportsmanship between front offices at that time.

Yes we put him out there and the thought was it should have been the franchise tag after the fact. But the process up to then had been one of good will in negotiations between teams and not undermineing one.

_________________
Image

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
.Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:52 pm 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 6563
Location: Covington, Washington
The Poison Pill wasn't a new issue in 2005, it just never had been "officially" used in an NFL contract.

Quote:
The advent of the poison pill was first introduced to the public by 49ers President Carmen Policy in 1996. The 49ers intended to sign Giants running back Rodney Hampton to an offer sheet with a poison pill that stated Hampton would be "on the field for 70% of the offensive plays over the next 2 seasons." The Giants had drafted Tyrone Wheatley with their first round pick in 1995 but he was largely ineffective in his first season. Since he played the same position as Hampton, the Giants had planned to ease him into the offense with Hampton on the back end of his career. For the Giants to match the 6 year deal, they would be forced to play Hampton in 70% of the plays, thus making the previous year's draft pick of Wheatley a loss. The 49ers later decided to not include the clause, as they felt the NFL would never approve the terms. Their assumption would be proven incorrect following the 2005 season, with the historic offer sheet Steve Hutchinson signed with the Minnesota Vikings.



Poison Pills. Only the Seahawks would fall for it.

_________________
Image
"Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians."


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:30 pm 
NET Practice Squad
Offline

Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 7:59 am
Posts: 63
Nice thread high jack


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:31 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 964
jammerhawk wrote:
Reinfeldt is still available and was more talented than Idzik.

Really? I didn't know that. He was great when he was here, and I agree, more taented than Idzik. Don't know how good JS is with that sort of stuff, but it seems like we need somebody. And pretty soon, huh?

_________________
Terry
(The Lurker)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:46 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:42 pm
Posts: 199
Location: Rival Country
How can a cap guy be a GM?

_________________
Image
sig by Ramster


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:58 pm 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7318
The Battle #83 wrote:
How can a cap guy be a GM?

83, best question I have heard all day.

My guess is Idzik is there to get them out of the salary cap issues, and is not expected to have say so in personnel. Woody and Rex are handling that.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:05 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm
Posts: 1390
You need a hitman to take out Sanchez to get them out of cap hell lol. How do they keep - get rid of him AND sign a guy that can play...


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:28 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun May 10, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 2712
Scottemojo wrote:
The Battle #83 wrote:
How can a cap guy be a GM?

83, best question I have heard all day.

My guess is Idzik is there to get them out of the salary cap issues, and is not expected to have say so in personnel. Woody and Rex are handling that.


My not hire an accountant then?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:09 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11294
Location: Graham, WA
Wasn't Schnieder considered a cap guy when he was hired on here?

_________________
Image
Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 10:37 am 
*Scott of Smacksville*
*Scott of Smacksville*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7318
Throwdown wrote:
Wasn't Schnieder considered a cap guy when he was hired on here?

Nope. that is the job Idzik had. Schneider has always been valued for his scouting eye (which is how we got bot Whitehurst, grrrr, and Wilson, yippee.

_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:09 pm 
* NET Curmudgeon *
* NET Curmudgeon *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
Posts: 6785
Location: Eastern Washington
drdiags wrote:
In hindsight, Ruskell should have figured on the increase and anticipated the poison pill, though Blue Talon will dispute that last thought. :stirthepot:

Oh right, people should always expect something that has never happened before... :roll:



For people who need a refresher, poison pills in contracts have a long history. One was used early in the existence of NFL free agency requiring more money from the player's old team than his new team -- after that, such contracts were banned. Since that time, perfectly legal and legitimate poison pills have been commonly used by teams trying to spirit a player away, in the form of front-loaded contracts, trying to leverage the other team's cap situation. That was something the Seahawks were prepared for in the Hutch situation. What they were not prepared for was the never-before-seen use of guarantees, and language involving other players' salaries and arbitrary dates, to effectively do what was previously banned.

Doesn't matter now. Lesson learned, life goes on. I'm over it. :thirishdrinkers:

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 1:15 pm 
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
*GOLD SUPPORTER*
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 1:08 pm
Posts: 2558
Schneider/Carroll, then Cable, in descending order of who we can least afford to lose. Everyone else who cares. LMAO at teams thinking that installing Bradley or Bevell as HC is going to change their fortunes. Bradley was here before JS/Pete came in and began making pro-bowlers out of 5th round castoffs on defense, and oddly enough Bradley's defenses weren't so great back then.

A cap guy doesn't even make the radar.

I'm ecstatic we haven't heard many rumors about Cable leaving. Okay so pass pro hasn't been outstanding, but Cable seems to be able to fashion a run blocking line no matter who is injured, and after the years where we'd be screwed all season when one lineman would go down, this is euphoria.

However we need to avoid listening to Cable when it comes to drafting players. The Carpenter/Moffit picks aren't exactly living up to their slots. Well not yet at any rate. I'm assuming those were his suggestion.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 3:45 pm 
* NET Philistine *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 10337
Location: Portland, OR
Bradley: Carroll:: Idzik: Schneider.

Or that's my guess.

_________________
My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Idzik to Jets just happened
 Post Posted: Sat Jan 19, 2013 5:00 pm 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 6563
Location: Covington, Washington
BlueTalon wrote:
drdiags wrote:
In hindsight, Ruskell should have figured on the increase and anticipated the poison pill, though Blue Talon will dispute that last thought. :stirthepot:

Oh right, people should always expect something that has never happened before... :roll:

:



And again, I don't agree with your review of the history

Quote:
The advent of the poison pill was first introduced to the public by 49ers President Carmen Policy in 1996. The 49ers intended to sign Giants running back Rodney Hampton to an offer sheet with a poison pill that stated Hampton would be "on the field for 70% of the offensive plays over the next 2 seasons." The Giants had drafted Tyrone Wheatley with their first round pick in 1995 but he was largely ineffective in his first season. Since he played the same position as Hampton, the Giants had planned to ease him into the offense with Hampton on the back end of his career. For the Giants to match the 6 year deal, they would be forced to play Hampton in 70% of the plays, thus making the previous year's draft pick of Wheatley a loss. The 49ers later decided to not include the clause, as they felt the NFL would never approve the terms. Their assumption would be proven incorrect following the 2005 season, with the historic offer sheet Steve Hutchinson signed with the Minnesota Vikings.


I agreed with the original call done by Ruskell, though I didn't know of the possibility of a Poison Pill. I was just joking around so I am not sure what is up with the "rolling eyes" icon. Thought we were better than that.

_________________
Image
"Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians."


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]



 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.