 |
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 17 posts ] |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
Axx
|
Post subject: How good was our D-Line under Quinn?  Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:56 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm
Posts: 735
|
|
I didnt really keep up with the Hawks from 09-11 for personal reasons (I didnt think they were playoff ready) so i didnt really watch many of there games and its even harder to watch there games when you live in Texas. All they show here are the Cowboy games.
So my question was, when did Quinn coach our D-line, how good were they, and what different personnel did they use back then compared to what personnel he will get this time around?
|
|
  |
|
|
|
lukerguy
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:06 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 11:00 pm
Posts: 887
|
|
Not sure, but he had one of the best D-Lines in college football. Great against the run, and at getting to the passer.
_________________  "We all we got, we all we need"
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:26 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
|
It was probably the best unit of a shitty defense.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:32 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
Posts: 8130
Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
They were pretty solid.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkFan72
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:38 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 8165
Location: Antioch, CA
|
|
That was when the D started to turn around, and it started with our D-line. Quinn is a solid coach, and I was seriously bummed when he left.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Fox0r
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:39 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:30 pm
Posts: 1850
Location: Lynnwood, WA
|
|
28 sacks as a team in 2009. Patrick Kerney was our #1 PR with 5 sacks on the year.
37 sacks as a team in 2010. Chris Clemons was our #1 PR with 11 sacks on the year. Raheem Brock was #2 with 9.
33 sacks as a team in 2011. Chris Clemons was our #1 PR with 11 sacks. No one else had more than 4.
Dang...we only had 36 sacks in 2012. Not much improvement. By comparison, the 2005 team had 47 sacks on the year.
#1 team in the NFL this year had 52 sacks on the year.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SharkHawk
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:49 pm |
|
| * NET Alumni * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:47 am
Posts: 3414
|
|
Quinn wasn't exactly working with superstars. He was getting good production out of guys that were overlooked elsewhere or assumed to be done. He's a good coach.
_________________  R.I.P. Dad. I miss you. You will never be forgotten 1/12/39 - 8/7/08
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkFan72
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 10:52 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 8165
Location: Antioch, CA
|
Fox0r wrote: 28 sacks as a team in 2009. Patrick Kerney was our #1 PR with 5 sacks on the year.
37 sacks as a team in 2010. Chris Clemons was our #1 PR with 11 sacks on the year. Raheem Brock was #2 with 9.
33 sacks as a team in 2011. Chris Clemons was our #1 PR with 11 sacks. No one else had more than 4.
Dang...we only had 36 sacks in 2012. Not much improvement. By comparison, the 2005 team had 47 sacks on the year.
#1 team in the NFL this year had 52 sacks on the year. The secondary in 2009 and 2010 wasn't nearly as good as it is now, though. I doubt very many of those sacks were coverage sacks. _________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
joeseahawks
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:18 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 3:43 pm
Posts: 228
|
|
How scary could this team be, if it had a pass rush? How good could this team be, if it was much improved on 3rd and long?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
chris98251
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:26 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 6142
Location: Renton Wa.
|
|
With Quinn he took Clemons and made him a pass rusher, Brock had the best year of his career and at a elevated age as far as DE's are concerned, moved Red to be the run stuffing end. They guy has that ability to make guys better quickly. We drafted some guys since he left in Scruggs and Irvin that played and were ok to respectable as rookies. Now with him back I wonder and if it is more the coensidence that the statement Pete made about pass rushers and his hiring if the biggest improvement we see will be there once again. It will be scary indeed if QB's are having to hurry and throw a ball up for grabs with our secondary routinely.
_________________  To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me... .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Outfield
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:31 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:11 am
Posts: 1157
|
chris98251 wrote: With Quinn he took Clemons and made him a pass rusher, Brock had the best year of his career and at a elevated age as far as DE's are concerned, moved Red to be the run stuffing end. They guy has that ability to make guys better quickly. We drafted some guys since he left in Scruggs and Irvin that played and were ok to respectable as rookies. Now with him back I wonder and if it is more the coensidence that the statement Pete made about pass rushers and his hiring if the biggest improvement we see will be there once again. It will be scary indeed if QB's are having to hurry and throw a ball up for grabs with our secondary routinely. Dang, it's posts like this that make me salivate about next season.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawKnPeppa
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:08 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm
Posts: 1202
|
gw232 wrote: chris98251 wrote: With Quinn he took Clemons and made him a pass rusher, Brock had the best year of his career and at a elevated age as far as DE's are concerned, moved Red to be the run stuffing end. They guy has that ability to make guys better quickly. We drafted some guys since he left in Scruggs and Irvin that played and were ok to respectable as rookies. Now with him back I wonder and if it is more the coensidence that the statement Pete made about pass rushers and his hiring if the biggest improvement we see will be there once again. It will be scary indeed if QB's are having to hurry and throw a ball up for grabs with our secondary routinely. Dang, it's posts like this that make me salivate about next season. 'Slurp!'
_________________
"A couple years from now Wilson will be forgotten about and you will forget I said he would fail" (Cboom, 2012)
|
|
| |
|
|
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 3:05 am |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7225
|
|
In addition to the magic Quinn worked in 2010 (Clemons, Brock, Bryant, etc), he also brought in Michael Bennett as a UDFA after the 2009 draft. Unfortunately, Mora/Ruskell weren't smart enough to keep Bennett and he became a star for Tampa. Bennett is scheduled to be a free agent in March.
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:25 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 16400
Location: SoCal
|
|
I wouldn't mind seeing Bennett back in Seattle, he might have a hefty price tag though.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
canfan
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:00 am |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:11 pm
Posts: 76
|
|
Who's left from the line that Quinn worked with? I know Red, Clem and Mebane were here then, but is there any others left from that group that I'm missing?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Evil_Shenanigans
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:34 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:15 am
Posts: 446
|
|
I was hoping for more from Irvin this year frankly. I know it was probably unrealistic to bring the kid in his rookie Season with such high expectations, but isn’t that why we spent the pick? IMO he needs to bulk up a little bit. We need a book end for a healthy Clemons! That will take care of the edges and then we can focus on getting Red healthy or bringing in some new blood to compete for that position. With Mebane and either Red or a similar sized run stopper next door then you can really concentrate on the pass rush.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Largent80
|
Post subject: Re: How good was our D-Line under Quinn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:50 am |
|
| NET Pro Bowler |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 16400
Location: SoCal
|
Evil_Shenanigans wrote: I was hoping for more from Irvin this year frankly. IMO he needs to bulk up a little bit. We said that about Tatupu as well and how did that turn out?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 17 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: akula, BAllenHawk, BallHawker, BamaHawk, Bigpumpkin, BlueTalons, CHawks4L, dbmack, Dismas, edogg23, FlyingGreg, Google [Bot], IcedHawk, JerHawk81, jpetty38, KCHawkGirl, kigenzun, lacenterhawk, Leep, Majestic-12 [Bot], Missing_Clink, nepahawk, peachesenregalia, RabidFrenzy, rickychen, Riley12, SilNWest, SmokinHawk, Spleenhawk2.0, Sports Hernia, Sprfunk, Starrman44, suppaball, SwissSeahawk, Tanzania12, Thepeelsessions, twisted_steel2, VancitySeahawk, Wasteland2112, Yakihawk, Zebulon Dak, Zukistubbs and 159 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
